On the media:  a diminished presence; taking a knee

As a participant and observer of government and politics my whole adult life I have worked with, fought with, and enjoyed the company of folks who are collectively called journalists.  They work for newspapers, television, and radio.  There are fewer of them now and their role has been changing significantly.

At the beginning of my working life I was employed at the Erie County Legislature.  There were issues with budgets, health care, public works projects, social services and many other things.  The legislators who I worked for were constantly dealing with those issues while at the same time dealing with the media.  “If we give this story to the Buffalo Evening News Doug Turner at the Courier Express will be ticked off.”  And visa versa, pretty much every day.  In retrospect we, legislators and staff, did not appreciate how meaningful that situation actually was because no matter whoever was chosen to receive the first dibs on a story, the story would get covered (and oftentimes, therefore, attacked by the other newspaper.)

The Courier Express passed out of existence forty-three years ago.  The newly named Buffalo News (since it began to publish in the morning) had the field all to themselves and they had a heyday with it.  The paper’s owners made a ton of money.  The newsroom staff was 200+ strong.

Over time things began to change.  The main culprit was the internet.  Pieces of the business started to slip away.  Classified ads previously ran many pages but are almost an afterthought now.  Social media took away the need for detailed movie listings while car shopping and home buying moved on to websites managed by the sellers.  Horror of horrors, many daily comics disappeared.

Jim Heaney, the editor and executive director of Investigative Post, last week had a report on the latest round of cutting at the Buffalo News.  Heaney reported (https://www.investigativepost.org/2025/09/19/more-cuts-coming-at-the-buffalo-news/) that the News this fall will cut another five staff members from the newsroom, bringing it down to around 40.  He noted that the news staff was about 85 when the present owners, Lee Enterprises, purchased the paper five years ago.

Heaney quoted Jon Harris, a reporter and president of the Buffalo Newspaper Guild:  “We’re disappointed that we’ll have to say goodbye to four or five more newsroom colleagues later this fall, and we’re hopeful that we’ll have enough volunteers willing and ready to resign with contractual severance so we can avoid layoffs.”

Heaney also noted that the News will cease publishing New York Times stories beginning in January.  The Times reports mostly covered national and international news as well long obits about many people who most Western New Yorkers had never heard of.  Maybe Associated Press reports will be the alternative.

The News recently published a statement about their circulation.   It indicated that as of June 1, 2025, paid daily newspaper distribution was down to 23,735; it used to be about 150,000.  There are 67,430 digital subscriptions making it among the lowest in the country.

Lee Enterprises is hemorrhaging money and carries a large debt.  It has previously fought off buyout attempts from Alden Global Capital, a firm that specializes in cannibalizing whatever it can extract from the newspapers it acquires.

The further reduction of Buffalo News operations hurts the Western New York community.  Municipal and school boards, public authorities, community organizations, and businesses are subject to less scrutiny.  Useful news about things happening in the area goes unreported.  It helps explain why people are less engaged in public dialogue and why voter turnout is diminished.

To a certain degree, the same can be said about the impact of federal funding cuts to public broadcasting at stations like Buffalo Toronto Public Media (aka WBFO), the NPR station in Buffalo.

Taking a knee

Coincidently, all this is happening as national television organizations are taking a knee to snowflake politicians who cannot handle criticism.  Threats to news organizations are threats to free speech.

I cannot believe that it would ever come to this, but I feel it important to quote Senator Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson on the subject as reported by Axios:

  • Cruz on his podcast:  FCC chair Brendan Carr’s warning to Disney, ABC’s parent, was “dangerous as hell … right out of ‘Goodfellas.’ That’s right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going: ‘Nice bar you have here, it’d be a shame if something happened to it.’”
  • Carlson’s hope that the assassination of Charlie Kirk won’t be used as a pretext for hate-speech laws: “[I]f that does happen, there is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that.”

The woke right’s cancel culture is riding high at this time.  Some of them who pledge allegiance to the Constitution seem to be forgetting the First Amendment:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Bluesky  @kenkruly

Twitter/X  @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

MAGA Mike PANICS as GOP wants HIM FIRED!!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on MAGA...

The Brief: Trump Seizes on SCOTUS Decision to Mess With the Midterms

Trump Fires Three EAC Commissioners A few weeks ago, the Supreme Court handed down a pair of decisions finding that...

Mamdani Confirms Taylor Swift Paid $160K To Cover Wedding Permit and Police Response

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani confirmed during a Friday presser that pop star Taylor Swift did, in fact, already pay a whopping $160,000 to the city for the permit and police response to her Madison Square Garden wedding.

The post Mamdani Confirms Taylor Swift Paid $160K To Cover Wedding Permit and Police Response first appeared on Mediaite.

CNBC blindsided as Musk abruptly bails on live interview while SpaceX shares freefall



CNBC was left holding the bag on Friday when Elon Musk abruptly backed out of a live, heavily promoted interview moments before it was set to air, as SpaceX shares slid below the price of their first public trade.

The network had spent the morning teasing the sit-down, billed as Musk's first television interview since SpaceX went public. Anchor Scott Wapner threw to correspondent Julia Boorstin at the Allen & Co. gathering in Sun Valley, Idaho, to explain why it suddenly wasn't happening.

"We've been promoting this exclusive interview that Elon Musk was expected to give to our Julia Boorstin, which is now apparently no longer happening. I want to bring in Julia Boorstin, who's been in Sun Valley. Julia, do you want to explain to us exactly what happened here, as this was imminent?" said Wapner.

"Yeah, we were expecting to start an interview with Elon Musk right now at noon Eastern. We just got word that he has to postpone," Boorstin replied, adding that the network hopes Musk will offer a new time.

Boorstin noted that SpaceX shares were trading below the level of their very first trade and well off the highs the stock reached after its record June debut. As she spoke, shares were off nearly 3% at around $148. SpaceX priced its IPO at $135 and opened at $150 on June 12 before surging in its opening sessions, then slipping back below that opening level as it was pulled into major market indexes.

She said there was plenty she had hoped to raise, including Grok 4.5, the AI model Musk's company launched Wednesday, and how SpaceX is holding down customer prices as component costs climb. That thread would have followed a CNBC interview a day earlier with OpenAI's Sam Altman about efficiency gains in his company's newest models.

Wapner called it an unfortunate development and said the network would report any update.

Trump PANICS as Crowd THREATENS HIS LIFE!!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...