Getting ahead of the impending damage from federal service cuts affecting New Yorkers

Today’s post is written by Politics and Other Stuff editor Paul Fisk

The MAGA wrecking ball approach to governance is inflicting incalculable harm on our nation, with more of it cynically timed to not take full effect until after the 2026 election.  Blue states like New York are being hit particularly hard.

Already enacted federal actions will dramatically increase health care costs and could eliminate insurance for 1.5 million New Yorkers.  The cuts increase hunger and food insecurity for 300,000 adults and children who currently benefit from SNAP. They negatively affect education, agriculture, and the environment. They move us backwards on climate change.  They raise prices for state and local governments as well as families. 

The unfortunate reality is that the harm already done will take years, if not decades, to repair.  The dissolution of safeguards and norms, the dismantling of bureaucratic capacity to provide needed services, the loss of institutional memory, the destruction of data and research, and the loss of faith in our government by our own citizens and the rest of the world are not things that can be fixed overnight.  The states must step up and salvage as much as possible.

The Fiscal Policy Institute, an independent, nonpartisan think tank, estimates New York state’s immediate budgetary loss over two years at $7.6 billion, roughly twice the state’s predictions, plus another $4.9 billion cut to the health care industry outside the state budget.  Medicaid cuts included in the federal mega-MAGA bill may seriously damage or even result in closings at rural hospitals.

The state may be inclined to follow a previous plan for facing big problems: paper them over in election years with one-time actions and put off permanent solutions that often never seem to materialize.    New York no longer has to plead poverty and an inability to do more.   

We have a better alternative now: reinstate the Stock Transfer Tax, a major revenue stream that was in place from 1905 until 1981.  It helped solve the New York City fiscal crisis in the 1970’s and it is needed again now.  It could bring in at least $15 to $20 billion annually, and grow, according to an analysis by noted economist and Yale Global Justice Fellow James Henry.

We have a golden opportunity to enact a long-term fix that could solve not just the immediate problem but provide resources to make serious progress on filling financial gaps in health care, education, infrastructure, climate change and other areas.

New York can reinstate nearly painlessly this miniscule one-tenth of one percent sales tax on stock trades, which is far below typical brokers’ fees and would be paid to a great extent by wealthy financial speculators, day traders, and out-of-state investors. Some wealthy traders have been contributing part of their profits in hopes of protecting their interests. 

Past objections to this surcharge have been credibly debunked in an article by James Henry and in a letter to colleagues from the Assembly sponsor, Phil Steck, a Democrat from the Albany area.  It would be tragic if we let a privileged few prevent us from adopting an equitable, recurring and growing revenue source that could dramatically improve our state’s fiscal condition. 

Our Democratic state government officials have the opportunity to stand up for their stated beliefs.  This is a chance to show voters that Albany can act on their behalf and not, like Washington, just for the already-wealthy, whose contributions some may have become a bit too fond of receiving.

We can counter the cuts from Washington and create a permanent revenue stream with growth potential. It can be a win-win. 

Tell your state representative that this is the year to do it: approve legislation (A1494/S1237) to create this revenue stream to address our major problems and get ahead of the devastating  federal cuts that are coming in programs that are vital to New Yorkers.

Paul Fisk is retired from the NY State Budget Division and is a former City of Buffalo Budget Director.

Bluesky  @kenkruly

Twitter/X  @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

The Insider Politics Sheets Are Scurrying for New Conventional Wisdom

One of the most important things to understand about politics is the danger of literalism, assuming the straightforward meanings are...

Keon Coleman: “As a Team We’re Going to Get Better”

Bills Wide Receiver Keon Coleman addresses the...

‘That guy doesn’t care’: MSNBC host calls out Trump’s indifference after executive faints



President Donald Trump gathered pharmaceutical giants to the Oval Office on Thursday to discuss weight loss drugs when Novo Nordisk executive Gordon Findlay collapsed. Trump stood from the desk, looming over the situation as Dr. Mehmet Oz rushed to the man. Trump was then photographed turning away from the scene, looking disappointed.

"Trump stands unmoved, annoyed looking, as staff rushes to revive the man," said MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Thursday night. "And you can look at this photo of Trump. It's reasonable to think that guy doesn't care about getting my costs down. Not really. People seem to forget this. We all have very short memories these days. He was president before. He was the least popular president for the duration of his first term in modern polling. He is even less popular now after seeing his approval plummet all year."

Host Jen Psaki added her comments, asking, "Did he understand what was happening?"

Psaki and Hayes weren't the only ones to notice Trump's indifference.

"This is how he reacted," said Democratic activist Harry Sisson. "A photo that perfectly encapsulates who he is."

"At the same time, HHS Secretary RFK Jr. immediately left the office, and Trump seems like posing for the camera. Cowardice, lack of empathy and fear is the trademark of this administration," Commented inHereticAI creator Mario Pawlowski.

"Someone faints in the oval office and Trump could give two s---s," said Morgan J. Freeman on X.

"Trump springs into action as a man collapses in the Oval Office," former Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) says sarcastically.

"Donald Trump reacts to a man in medical distress in the Oval Office," characterized columnist Matthew Yglesias.

"A man suffers a medical emergency in the Oval Office and Trump just stands there, staring blankly, like someone shut off the robot in the Disney Hall of Presidents," quipped novelist Patrick S. Tomlinson.

Nebraska state Sen. Megan Hunt (I) recalled a 2017 report in Harper's Bazaar about an 80-year-old man who collapsed in Trump's presence and began bleeding. "Get that blood cleaned up, it's disgusting," Trump said, according to the report.

Legendary comedian and creative genius John Cleese described the photo saying, "Trump seething because he's not the centre of attention for a moment.

Findlay was ultimately okay.