Mid-March campaign financials point to significant state funding of 2026 races

A June primary schedule in New York State compresses election activity to a relatively short period of time.  Among those activities is an early round of campaign financial reports from statewide or legislative candidates who have applied to participate in the state’s Public Campaign Financing Program.

The Program was created in 2020, modeled after a similar project in New York City.  State matching funds are distributed for personal contributions ranging from $5 to $250.  The matches for statewide candidates are set at $6 per dollar contributed, while matches for legislative candidates vary from 12:1 to 8:1 dependent on the amount contributed.  Total state costs in 2024 were more than $32 million.

In that year more than 200 state legislative candidates participated.  Word seems to have gotten around since then.  When sign-ups for 2026 participation closed out on February 23rd there were 434 candidates on the list, including several statewide candidates.

The list includes Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman; five candidates for comptroller; and the Democratic and Republican candidates for attorney general.  Governor Kathy Hochul is not participating.  Eighteen legislative candidates from Western New York are signed up, which is about double the number from 2024.

The rules of the Public Campaign Financing Board (PCFB) require participating candidates to file financial reports on March 16th, which is more than two months in advance of when candidates who are in a primary ordinarily must report.

These procedures will unlock tens of millions of dollars in state funds for this year’s elections.  While one of the primary purposes of the Program is to help new candidates be competitive with established officeholders who generally have easier access to donations, a review of this year’s participants shows that incumbent officeholders, who often have long established political committees with healthy fund balances, are becoming quite comfortable with using state funding too.

Here is a list of statewide candidates participating in the program as well as legislative candidates in Western New York.  The code for the information is R=revenues raised; S=money spend; and C=cash-on-hand.  All data is for the period running from January 12th through March 12th.

Governor – Republicans

Bruce Blakeman – R  $1,101,088;  S  $154,862; C  $1,636,883

Larry Sharpe – R  $15,427; S  $16,945; C  $29,007

Attorney General

Incumbent Democrat Leticia James – R  $643,956; S  $623,401; C  $3,149,663

Republican Saritha Komatireddy – R  $117,086; S  $129,952; C  $504,501

Comptroller

Incumbent Democrat Tom DiNapoli – R  $306,307; S  $340,902; C  $1,320,126

Democrat Adam Bunkeddko – R  $46,612; S  $82,676; C  $77,886

Democrat Raj Goyle – R  $443,053; S  $436,525; C  $1,252,221

Democrat Drew Warshaw – R  $257,604; S  $616,988; C  $911,640

Republican Joseph Hernandez – R  $19,667; S  $14,797; C  $32,708

Western New York State Senate

61st District – incumbent Democrat Jeremy Zellner – R  $8,650; S  $7,494; C  $152,641

61st District – Democrat Jon Rivera – R  $63,703; S  $15,570; C  $86,044

63rd District – incumbent Democrat April Baskin – R  $49,389; S  $7,984; C  $99,602

63rd District – Republican Geoff Szymanski – R  $200;  S  $0; C  $200

Senator Pat Gallivan (60th District) and Thomas Anda (District 62) are listed as participants in the state program but have no campaign reporting on file.

Western New York Assembly

142nd District – incumbent Democrat Pat Burke – R  $28,266; S  $15,057; C  $63,475

142nd District – Republican Gary Dickson – R  $11,086 plus $9,000 personal loan; S  $2,063; C  $18,024

143rd District – incumbent Republican Pat Chludzinski – R  $27,485; S  $3,105; C  $41,721

143rd District – Democrat Ryan Taughrin – R  $10,990; S  $1,071; C  $9,120

144th District – incumbent Republican Paul Bologna – R  $9,400; S  $12,901; C  $96,610

144th District – Democrat Donna Dye Sholk – R  $3,561; S  $245; C  $3,317

145th District – Democrat Nate McMurray – R  $4,864; S  $151; C  $4,713

145th District – Republican Rebecca Wydysh – R  $19,567; S  $3,190; C  $16,377

146th District – incumbent Democrat Karen McMahon – R  $20,100; S  $0; C  $20,100

149th District – Democrat Adam Bojak – R  $10,117; S  $10,337; C  $13,138

149th District – Democrat Kevin Deese – R  $7,031; S  $8,305; C  $22,424

149th District – Democrat Karen Hoak – R  $16,423; S  $14,362; C  $6,052

Candidates who have signed up to participate but who wind up with no opponent will not receive state funds.

In the special election for the 61st District seat that was vacated by Mayor Sean Ryan both the winner of the election, Jeremy Zellner, and his Republican opponent Dan Gagliardo received state funds for their elections.  Zellner received the maximum amount allowable, $375,000.  Gagliardo was paid $196,694.  As of March 10th, only Zellner, Gagliardo, and two Assembly candidates from New York City have received funds from the PCFB.

PCFB procedures provide for audits of about one-third of the participants in the program each election cycle, selected by a lottery composed of all participants.  Per PCFB rules, it can take 18 months following an election to complete an audit.  The committees from the 2024 state legislative elections that were selected for audit were publicly identified.

The state law that created the Public Campaign Financing Program was amended last year to provide that candidates selected for post-election audits are anonymous unless there is a finding of wrongdoing.  Here are the revised PCFB regulations:

          6221.27 Audits

(c) The names of candidates and districts selected for an audit shall not be disclosed unless there is a declared finding of wrongdoing by the PCFB. Audits shall be conducted in a confidential manner, and any documents, information, or findings are confidential. Upon issuance of a Final Audit Report where the PCFB has found that a violation occurred, any records related to such audit shall be subject to the provisions of article 6 of the Public Officers Law [the Freedom of Information Law]. 

Whether the state financing program is working as intended is not a settled issue.  The well-respected Brennan Center for Justice, one of the main advocates for creation of the program, says that it is.

Questionable or illegal activities might include:

Candidates using friends or family in effect as state-paid consultants or as landlords for campaign headquarters.

The legitimacy of campaign expenses (the New York Times found a candidate who reported expenses for headquarters that did not exist).

The use of straw donors (donors reimbursed to donate) to receive state matching funds.  The Albany Times Union reported on one such incident involving a mid-state Senate candidate.

There has been no official fact-based public analysis of how things operated in 2024.  The state comptroller’s office, which might ordinarily be doing such work, won’t be able to do so with credibility since whoever is elected state comptroller will have been a participant in the program in 2026.

In the meantime, candidate participation in 2026 will likely more than double the amount of state funds provided to 2024 candidates.  The distribution of tens of millions of dollars in state funds should require better public reporting and review.

A footnote

Today is the 11th anniversary of Politics and Other Stuff, first published on this date in 2015. This is post 691. I thank all of you who read this blog. I like a line from a movie about the Washington Post, where publisher Kay Graham says “our readers are leaders.” I believe that is true of the Western New Yorkers who read this blog.

I greatly appreciate the sources that have helped me assemble the posts all these years. Please keep the tips coming.

Bluesky @kenkruly

Twitter/X  @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

CNBC blindsided as Musk abruptly bails on live interview while SpaceX shares freefall



CNBC was left holding the bag on Friday when Elon Musk abruptly backed out of a live, heavily promoted interview moments before it was set to air, as SpaceX shares slid below the price of their first public trade.

The network had spent the morning teasing the sit-down, billed as Musk's first television interview since SpaceX went public. Anchor Scott Wapner threw to correspondent Julia Boorstin at the Allen & Co. gathering in Sun Valley, Idaho, to explain why it suddenly wasn't happening.

"We've been promoting this exclusive interview that Elon Musk was expected to give to our Julia Boorstin, which is now apparently no longer happening. I want to bring in Julia Boorstin, who's been in Sun Valley. Julia, do you want to explain to us exactly what happened here, as this was imminent?" said Wapner.

"Yeah, we were expecting to start an interview with Elon Musk right now at noon Eastern. We just got word that he has to postpone," Boorstin replied, adding that the network hopes Musk will offer a new time.

Boorstin noted that SpaceX shares were trading below the level of their very first trade and well off the highs the stock reached after its record June debut. As she spoke, shares were off nearly 3% at around $148. SpaceX priced its IPO at $135 and opened at $150 on June 12 before surging in its opening sessions, then slipping back below that opening level as it was pulled into major market indexes.

She said there was plenty she had hoped to raise, including Grok 4.5, the AI model Musk's company launched Wednesday, and how SpaceX is holding down customer prices as component costs climb. That thread would have followed a CNBC interview a day earlier with OpenAI's Sam Altman about efficiency gains in his company's newest models.

Wapner called it an unfortunate development and said the network would report any update.

Trump breaks silence after Supreme Court rules against his birthright citizenship order



Less than an hour after the Supreme Court dealt the Trump administration a devastating blow by rejecting its attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship, President Donald Trump began plotting a legislative workaround.

On Truth Social, Trump wrote, “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process.”

He urged Congress to "start TODAY" on ending birthright citizenship, pledging his "Complete and Total Support."

Birthright citizenship, enshrined in the 14th Amendment, grants full U.S. citizenship to all people born in the United States or its territories regardless of parental citizenship status.

Trump, supported by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, has long targeted birthright citizenship as part of his immigration crackdown agenda, according to Bulwark Media.

Trump has repeatedly and falsely claimed the U.S. is the only country with such rights, despite dozens of nations, including Canada and Mexico, having identical protections, according to The Washington Post.

Watch the video below.


Rick Wilson Touts ‘Karmic Comfort’ In Lindsey Graham Dying After He ‘Sold His Soul’ For Iran War

Rick Wilson said there is "karmic comfort" in Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) dying after he "sold his soul" pushing President Donald Trump to launch the Iran war.

The post Rick Wilson Touts ‘Karmic Comfort’ In Lindsey Graham Dying After He ‘Sold His Soul’ For Iran War first appeared on Mediaite.

Johnson Looks for Meaningless Ways To Satisfy Trump, Far-Right on Birthright Citizenship

Buying Himself Time House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) went on Fox News on Sunday to speak to an audience of...