Visit Buffalo Niagara Launches Buffalo Cares! Stay Safe Pledge

Visit Buffalo Niagara (VBN), the official destination marketing organization for Erie County, has launched the Buffalo Cares! Stay Safe Pledge, an initiative designed to assure visitors that the local hospitality industry is re-doubling its efforts to make their health and safety its highest priority. It is also intended to help industry partners ensure the safety of their employees and re-open in a safe and successful manner.

Signing the pledge signals an agreement by the participating organizations that they are following federal, state and local health and safety guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. This public commitment made by Buffalo businesses to ensuring visitor well-being by adhering to the highest practices and protocols of cleanliness, health checks and social distancing will encourage visitation to our region as we begin our recovery from the devastating impact of the virus.

“We’re excited to launch the Buffalo Cares program,” said Patrick Kaler, VBN President and CEO. “It’s another example of the collaborative, forward thinking spirit that infuses our hospitality industry. As we prepare to welcome visitors back to our city, it’s important that they know how much we value their health and safety and the lengths we are going as we prepare for their arrival.”

Once signed, participating businesses will receive digital assets for their place of business and websites alerting their visitors, both on-site and online, that they are a Buffalo Cares! pledge partner.

“All pledge partners will be listed on our social channels and the VisitBuffaloNiagara.com website,” Kaler added. “We want to let the traveling public know through every channel at our disposal that Buffalo is ready to re-open and welcome visitors.”

Among the early participants in the Buffalo Cares! program are: Shea’s Performing Arts Center, the Martin House, Vidler’s 5&10, Aloft Buffalo Downtown, Wyndham Garden Williamsville, Hampton Inn Buffalo South and many others.

Related articles

The Cruelest Irony of the Abrego Garcia Case

In the convoluted, never-ending saga of the wrongfully deported and then indicted Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a federal judge in Maryland...

Dale and the Z Dubs @ Buffalo Iron Works

The post Dale and the Z Dubs @ Buffalo...

Drew Warshaw: Investing pension funds in affordable housing

Democrat Drew Warshaw, candidate for state comptroller,...

Josh Allen: “All Hands On Deck” | Buffalo Bills

Quarterback Josh Allen addressed the media after...

Trump official claims ’50 years of discrimination’ against whites as lawyers flee DOJ



Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon claimed that the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division was guilty of "50 years of discrimination" against white people after about 75% of the agency's lawyers said she was behind a plot to drive them out.

"I think there was some denial and they had crying sessions together," Dhillon told The New York Post this week. "Frankly, it was shocking to them. They had unhappy hours. It was like a lot of drama and handwringing."

"I didn't fire anybody. I just told them they have to approach their job differently. They self-deported with a nice golden parachute from the government."

On Wednesday's appearance on The Charlie Kirk Show, Dhillon encouraged viewers to apply for jobs at the reconstructed Civil Rights Division.

"We just sued Minneapolis for discriminating against teachers who are not minorities and, you know, on and on and on," she promised. "And so we are hiring, and so lawyers with at least 18 months of experience who are interested in serving a tour of duty to help their country."

Charlie Kirk Show producer Andrew Kolvet lamented that white people could soon no longer hold majority status in the U.S.

"Let's say it was 83% white country [in the 1960s]; now we're basically 50%," he noted. "You give that another 10 years, it's going to be probably under 50%, maybe right around 50%. ... When I was born, I think we were around 80% white still."

Dhillon admitted that "we have a history of discrimination in our country."

But she suggested that the courts went too far with a 1971 decision that started the concept of disparate impact.

"So in other words, you no longer necessarily had to prove in your discrimination case, whatever the context was, that you are actually being the victim of intentional discrimination," she remarked. "You could simply prove that there's a hiring process or a policy, or there's certain, you know, tests that are required, and I, because I'm African-American, I can't pass a test."

"We have now issued a guidance that says that this 50 years of discrimination is against frankly law-abiding practices and businesses and recipients is over," she added. "It is harming a lot of people. It is wrong."