Jewish Community Responds to Williamsville Mayor’s Comparison of COVID Rules to Nazi & Communist Abuse

The Buffalo Jewish Community Relations Council and Holocaust Resource Center of Buffalo issued this statement in response to comments made at the Williamsville Village Board meeting on May 9, 2022 when Williamsville officials compared Covid-19 rules to Nazi and communist abuse.
The Buffalo Jewish Community Relations Council and the Holocaust Resource Center of Greater Buffalo unequivocally reject the comparisons made between Covid-19 rules and the Holocaust made by the Mayor of Williamsville and two fellow trustees at the Williamsville Village Board Meeting on May 9, 2022.
It is deeply wrong to make these parallels.
These comparisons are extremely disrespectful and demeaning to those who survived the Holocaust, their family members, and to the 11 million people who were murdered. When we inappropriately equate modern issues to the Holocaust, we increase the chances of becoming immune to this global tragedy, which deserves to be remembered in its own
right. Making analogies to the Holocaust or other oppressive acts distracts from the important task of finding solutions to the issues of today. Modern issues do not need to be compared to the Holocaust or other oppressive acts to be considered negative or important.
We are calling for more civil discourse in our public spaces. We must remember and respect our history, be mindful of language that is misused and hurtful, and reject these comparisons whenever we hear them.

Related articles

Trump Blames Judge For Making His Cash to Cover Up Porn Star Sex Trial ‘Salacious’

Trump had strong words for Judge Juan Merchan on Friday morning, blaming the judge overseeing his hush money trial  for making it "as salacious as possible."

The post Trump Blames Judge For Making His Cash to Cover Up Porn Star Sex Trial ‘Salacious’ first appeared on Mediaite.

Real Elon Musk Post About Future Robotic ‘Housewife Who Never Nags’?

Screenshots suggested Musk posted his prediction for the future on his social media site X.

‘Swarming in lies’: Scholar panics that latest Trump comments show him ‘dangerously unfit’



Donald Trump's recent sit-down with Time Magazine for a wide-ranging interview under the title "If He Wins" provides clues that he has become increasingly "unfit" to hold office again, according to a professor from Arizona State University.

In his Substack column, author and scholar Steven Beschloss claimed every voter should be alarmed by the former president's answers, including suggestions that he is not averse to violence similar to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot if he fails to win re-election in 2024.

Posing the question over whether Trump is "unfit" to serve in the Oval Office again, he added the former president is now "dangerously unfit."

ALSO READ: A neuroscientist reveals how Trump and Biden's cognitive impairments are different

Writing that Trump told Time reporter Eric Cortellessa of his desire to "pardon January 6 insurrectionists, deploy the National Guard in American cities at will, give police immunity from prosecution, close the White House office responsible for pandemic preparedness, and permit red states to monitor women’s pregnancies and prosecute abortion ban violators," Beschloss claimed Trump's replies should raise red flags about his mental state.

Noting a close reading of the Time transcript reveals, "a deeply untrustworthy man untethered from reality, swarming in lies, absorbed by grievance, unable to grapple with policy nuance and dependent on empty slogans to motivate himself," he added, "None of this is surprising, but when you read through the hours of interview material, you can see just how shallow his thinking is, how unreliable are his pronouncements and equivocations, how utterly ill-equipped he is to confront the complexities of our modern world — and, really, how crazy it is that serious people are forced to take this man seriously."

According to Beschloss, Trump seems to believe "his rejection of factual reality is a badge of honor."

With that in mind, he warned, "It will take more than divine intervention to ensure a man like this never sees the inside of the Oval Office again. It will take all of us — and tens of millions of others who decide that they will vote and do everything they can to ensure the survival of American democracy, the promise of America, basic human decency and the primacy of factual reality."

You can read more here.

Gateway Pundit warned by its own lawyer it was using ‘a damned fraud’ as a source: report



A new filing in a defamation lawsuit filed by Georgia poll workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss against the conspiracy theory website Gateway Pundit reveals that workers at the site feared for their credibility, reported The Guardian — and their own attorney warned them that the source for their claims was not to be trusted.

The site's founder, Jim Hoft, has earned the nickname "The Dumbest Man on the Internet" for years of strange and sloppy claims. Despite this, former President Donald Trump has been reported to be an avid reader of the site.

"Attorneys for Freeman and Moss ... said in their filing that John Burns, a lawyer for Gateway Pundit, had warned the site about relying on Kevin Moncla, a source in Georgia who fed the site information on Freeman and Moss, including their non-public personnel files, according to the filing," said the report.

"'Moncla is a known fabricator. I wouldn’t touch/publish anything he produces,” Burns reportedly wrote, while also calling Moncla “a g-------d fraud."

ALSO READ: Read this powerful GOP senator’s pay-to-play 'benefits package' for lobbyists

As if that weren't enough, Freeman and Moss’s attorneys also unearthed messages from Moncla said in which he said of their clients, "I will help you nail these b----s."

According to the report, Moncla was charged with voyeurism and ordered to pay $3.25 million after filming guests in the bathroom at his house.

Earlier this week, Gateway Pundit filed for bankruptcy amid the litigation against them.

Moss and Freeman, who counted ballots in Atlanta in 2020, have become a focus of numerous MAGA conspiracy theories, spread in part by Trump allies like Rudy Giuliani, who claimed that they were stuffing ballots — based in part on a supposed "flash drive" one passed to the other that turned out to be a ginger mint. Giuliani was found liable for $148 million in a defamation default judgment for his role in these claims.

In addition to the defamation cases, efforts to harass the two workers form part of the election racketeering case against Trump's allies in Fulton County.