Parlato Pleads Guilty to Tax Charge; Will Forfeit $1 Million

Attorney Trini E. Ross announced today that Frank R. Parlato, Jr., 67, pleaded guilty to willful failure to file returns involving cash transactions of more than $10,000 before U.S. District Judge Richard J. Arcara. The charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine of $25,000. As part of his plea, Parlato will pay $184,939.51 to the IRS. He will also forfeit approximately $1,000,000 that was seized by the Government in 2015.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Charles M. Kruly and Michael DiGiacomo, who are handling the case, stated that between 2004 to 2017, Parlato had an ownership interest in and/or managed the One Niagara Building in Niagara Falls, NY. Following Parlato’s acquisition of One Niagara, he permitted vendors to lease space both inside and outside the building. These vendors catered to tourists and sold food, souvenirs, and tours of Niagara Falls. With business typically busy in the summer, each season Parlato negotiated new seasonal rental agreements with the building’s vendors, typically requiring each vendor to pay 25% of their gross revenue as rent. Parlato was required to file an IRS Form 8300 when receiving annual cash rent payments in excess of $10,000 in one transaction or two or more related transactions. During the time period that he owned and/or managed One Niagara, Parlato willfully failed to file IRS Forms 8300 for annual cash rent payments he received from One Niagara’s vendors which were in excess of $10,000.

For example, in 2008, a vendor who operated a food stand, agreed to rent space for 25% of the vendor gross sales. In 2010, the vendor paid Parlato approximately $19,970 in rent in cash, however, Parlato failed to file an IRS Form 8300 for the 2010 season. Parlato admits that from 2006 to 2017, the tax loss from unreported income was approximately $390,346.

Sentencing is scheduled for December 7, 2022, before Judge Arcara.

Related articles

Where the Bands Are: This Week in Live Music and Concert News

Phish return to the SPHERE Las VegasApril 16,...

Vance’s Misleading Claims on Housing Prices and Illegal Immigration

Vice President JD Vance has exaggerated the increase in...

Josh Allen Asked… And The Wyoming Fans Delivered! #shorts #joshallen

Subscribe to the Buffalo Bills YT Channel: https://bufbills.co/2Yhjq9j For...

‘Badly broken’ Trump triggers swift outrage with double-down on Rob Reiner attack



President Donald Trump sent the internet into a frenzy on Monday afternoon after he doubled down on his comments about slain director Rob Reiner from earlier in the day.

Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday morning that Reiner suffered from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and said the director died "due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction." The comments sparked bipartisan outrage.

Reiner and his wife, Michelle, were found dead in their Hollywood home on Saturday night. Authorities have identified the Reiners' 32-year-old son, Nick, as the primary suspect in the case after he and Rob had an argument at a holiday party hosted by talk show host Conan O'Brien, according to CNN.

Trump doubled down on those comments when CNN's Kristen Holmes asked Trump about the criticism he received from Republicans during a press conference on Monday afternoon.

"I wasn't a fan of his at all," Trump said. "He was a deranged person."

Political analysts and observers condemned Trump's comments on social media.

"FFS," conservative columnist Charlie Sykes posted on X.

"I know his staff is beyond shame, but each and every one of them should feel utterly embarrassed to work for a human this badly broken," political speechwriter Zev Karlin Neumann posted on X.

"Just disgusting," writer Olivia Juliana posted on X.

"What are the deletists going to say now?" entertainment entrepreneur Ian Schaefer posted on X.

"Hey, Erika Kirk! Are you going to tell F---face over here to tone down the hateful rhetoric?" writer Polly Singh asked on X.

"This is why we all can’t wait for the day," Democratic digital strategist Ally Sammarco posted on X.

Trump official claims ’50 years of discrimination’ against whites as lawyers flee DOJ



Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon claimed that the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division was guilty of "50 years of discrimination" against white people after about 75% of the agency's lawyers said she was behind a plot to drive them out.

"I think there was some denial and they had crying sessions together," Dhillon told The New York Post this week. "Frankly, it was shocking to them. They had unhappy hours. It was like a lot of drama and handwringing."

"I didn't fire anybody. I just told them they have to approach their job differently. They self-deported with a nice golden parachute from the government."

On Wednesday's appearance on The Charlie Kirk Show, Dhillon encouraged viewers to apply for jobs at the reconstructed Civil Rights Division.

"We just sued Minneapolis for discriminating against teachers who are not minorities and, you know, on and on and on," she promised. "And so we are hiring, and so lawyers with at least 18 months of experience who are interested in serving a tour of duty to help their country."

Charlie Kirk Show producer Andrew Kolvet lamented that white people could soon no longer hold majority status in the U.S.

"Let's say it was 83% white country [in the 1960s]; now we're basically 50%," he noted. "You give that another 10 years, it's going to be probably under 50%, maybe right around 50%. ... When I was born, I think we were around 80% white still."

Dhillon admitted that "we have a history of discrimination in our country."

But she suggested that the courts went too far with a 1971 decision that started the concept of disparate impact.

"So in other words, you no longer necessarily had to prove in your discrimination case, whatever the context was, that you are actually being the victim of intentional discrimination," she remarked. "You could simply prove that there's a hiring process or a policy, or there's certain, you know, tests that are required, and I, because I'm African-American, I can't pass a test."

"We have now issued a guidance that says that this 50 years of discrimination is against frankly law-abiding practices and businesses and recipients is over," she added. "It is harming a lot of people. It is wrong."