House committee staffers face no pay if speaker isn’t decided by Jan. 13, officials warn

House Republicans’ fight over the speaker’s gavel could have an unintended victim: their staff.

New guidelines sent to committees on Thursday and obtained exclusively by POLITICO lay out a messy, complicated process for how the speaker’s race will have a trickle-down effect on everything from paying committee staff to student loan repayments. Between the lengthy speaker fight, which members expect could go to multiple ballots and even last days, and House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy‘s decision to punt contested committee chair elections, many staffers are facing heaps of uncertainty in the next term.

And the guidance — provided by the House Administration Committee and sent out by the House’s chief administrative officer — points to a big warning date: Jan. 13.

“Committees need to be aware that should a House Rules package not be adopted by end of business on January 13 no committee will be able to process payroll since the committee’s authority for the new Congress is not yet confirmed,” according to the memo sent out to House committees.

Also, according to the guidance, if by the end of Jan. 13 the House hasn’t adopted a rules package that outlines how the chamber will run next year, committees won’t be able to process student loan repayments. That means House employees enrolled in the 10-year student loan forgiveness program may face breaks in service, which can affect both retirement and whether they qualify for loan forgiveness.

The memo comes days before the Jan. 3 vote, with McCarthy still working to lock down the 218 votes he will need to claim the House gavel. The California Republican faces an open rebellion among conservatives, with five GOP lawmakers saying they will vote against him and several more staying on the fence as they try to win concessions from leadership. McCarthy can only afford to lose four votes among his party.

The impact on committee staff is just one of many domino effects from the conference’s speaker struggle, despite Republican hopes that the party could immediately move forward on multiple investigations as it takes the House majority.

Some committees already have GOP chairs waiting in the wings, such as Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) getting tapped to lead the House Oversight Committee. But McCarthy punted decisions on a handful of contested races, including who will lead the party’s top tax-writing panel and another that would oversee agencies handling the border, until after the speaker’s race is finished next month.

For those panels, the most senior Republican member serving on the committee acts as a de facto interim chair. Those senior lawmakers will need to designate which current committee staff — from both the majority and minority parties — will stay on after the new Congress starts on Jan. 3 until House Republicans select a new chair, according to the new guidance. Staff who are staying into the new Congress “are expected to continue to carry out their official duties in the interim period between January 3 and when the committee chair is appointed.”

The House can’t adopt a new rules package or formally green-light committee authority until after a speaker is selected, sparking worries about a legislative and administrative pile up. McCarthy, or whoever is speaker next year, also appoints members to the House Intelligence Committee. Plus, the speaker would tap Republicans to lead the House Rules Committee, which helps govern the floor, and the House Administration Committee, which has oversight of Capitol security.

Questions about the impact a lengthy speaker’s fight could have on committees and committee staff have swirled among House GOP ranks for weeks.

Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio) said that he brought the issue up in a closed-door GOP meeting earlier this month. Meanwhile, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) previously told POLITICO that as Republicans prepare for the Jan. 3 vote, “the one open question right now is staff funding.”

Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.

Related articles

FEMA pressures staff to rat out colleagues who have criticized Trump anonymously: report



A number of Federal Emergency Management Agency staff that openly criticized President Donald Trump are under intense investigation from FEMA leadership, and under threats of termination should they refuse to reveal the names of their colleagues who criticized Trump anonymously, Bloomberg reported Thursday.

Nearly 200 FEMA employees signed onto a letter in August pushing back against the Trump administration’s cuts to FEMA, warning that the cuts could jeopardize the agency’s ability to adequately respond to disasters.

More than a dozen FEMA employees – all of whom signed onto the letter – were soon placed on leave. Now, remaining staff that had signed onto the letter using their name are being investigated by agency leadership, being threatened to reveal the names of their colleagues who signed the letter anonymously, according to insiders who spoke with Bloomberg and documents reviewed by the outlet.

“The interviews with FEMA workers have been carried out by the agency's division that investigates employee misconduct, and those interviewed have been told they risk being fired for failure to cooperate,” Bloomberg writes in its report. “The employees have been instructed not to bring counsel, according to people familiar with the process.”

The revelation that FEMA staff under investigation were being instructed not to bring legal counsel was revealed, in part, by Colette Delawalla, the founder of the nonprofit organization Stand Up for Science, the same organization that helped FEMA staff publish its letter of dissent.

“They are not really given an option not to comply,” Delawalla told Bloomberg. “They don’t have guidance while they’re in there.”

Trump has previously said he wanted to phase out FEMA and “bring it down to the state level,” with the agency struggling to respond to emergencies such as the deadly Texas flood in July following new Trump administration policies that led to funding lapses for the agency.

A previous batch of FEMA employees – 140 of them – were placed on leave back in July for signing onto a different letter of dissent, which itself followed a number of FEMA employees being forcibly reassigned to work for Immigrations Customs and Enforcement amid Trump’s mass deportation push.

Critics have characterized the FEMA purges as a blatant violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act, which provides clear protections for government employees from retaliation for disclosing information that is a “specific danger to public health or safety.”

St. Adalbert Basilica 140th ‘Pre-Anniversary Mass’ and Devotion to St. Therese of Lisieux, “The Little Flower” – October 11, 2025

All are welcome to join us on Saturday, Oct. 11th at 5:30pm at St. Adalbert Basilica as we celebrated our 140th ‘Pre-Anniversary Mass’ and Devotion

🚨Newsom CALLS OUT Trump for SUSPICIOUS HOSPITAL VISIT

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on California...

Kevin O’Leary: US stake in Intel is ‘waste of taxpayer dollars’

Kevin O'Leary: US stake in Intel is 'waste of taxpayer dollars'

lead image

A Shortlist of Federal Data the Trump Administration Has Tampered With or Destroyed

The scale and scope of federal data and statistics that have been completely removed or otherwise compromised by President Donald...