‘Weak’ relocation clause in Bills’ lease

The Buffalo Bills would have an easier time abandoning their new stadium in Orchard Park for another city than any of the other teams playing in subsidized stadiums built for NFL franchises in recent years, Investigative Post has found.

Four NFL stadiums have been built with public assistance since 2014: Levi’s Stadium for the San Francisco 49ers, U.S. Bank Stadium for the Minnesota Vikings, Mercedes-Benz Stadium for the Atlanta Falcons, and Allegiant Stadium for the Las Vegas Raiders.

Like the Bills draft lease, those agreements require teams in those stadiums to pay back the taxpayer’s investment in the event they leave.



But there’s a key difference: The financial penalty starts to decrease for the Bills after they’ve played in the new stadium for 15 years out of their 30-year lease. The other teams have to say put longer — 23 to 30 years — before their bill would start to go down.

“If the goal here is to keep the Bills in Buffalo long term, then [the lease] absolutely should have an extremely stringent requirement [to stay], especially given the amount the county and state are putting in,” said J.C. Bradbury, an economics professor at Kenneshaw State University who has studied stadium deals.

“It sounds weak to me,” he said of the relocation provisions in the lease.

One other difference: Most of the other agreements provide the option to extend the lease past the initial 30- or 40-year term. The Bills deal makes no mention of a lease extension.

Yet another difference: The stadium authority in Las Vegas has veto power over any attempt by the team to move out of town. Also, in the event the team is sold, the new owner is obligated to honor the lease.

Many of the stadium deals, including the Bills’, allows public entities to sue a team for breach of contract in the event it breaks its lease. That legal mechanism, state officials said, will require the Bills to stay put for the full 30 years of their lease.

“They don’t have a choice. They don’t get to say, ‘Well, we’re in year 28 now, we’re going to pay this penalty and leave,’” Stephen Gawlik, Empire State Development’s senior counsel, told reporters Monday. “That’s not the way this non-relocation agreement works.”

It’s worth noting, however, that no court in recent history has stopped a major league team from moving to another city.

Six franchises in the NFL alone have changed cities since 1982. The league sued in an effort to stop the Raiders from leaving Oakland in 1982 and St. Louis sued the Rams in 2017 in an effort to keep the team. Both cities lost their teams.

What’s more, NFL owners are incentivized to allow teams to move, as they assess a relocation fee on the franchise moving that is split among the league’s other teams.

Financial terms

The Bills stadium is slated to cost $1.4 billion. The state will contribute $600 million, the county $250 million.  The Bills will pay $550 million, funded in part by the NFL and personal seat licenses charged to fans. The team will also be responsible for any cost overruns.

That public contribution to construction costs for the Bills stadium is greater than any other NFL facility built since 2000. Only Levi’s Stadium, home to the San Francisco 49ers, involved a similar amount of public money.

In addition to construction costs, the county and state will contribute $400 million over the course of the 30-year lease for maintenance and capital improvements. The county’s portion, $120 million, will come from a surcharge on ticket sales, concessions and parking. The state’s share is $280 million. The Bills contribution will be $27 million.

In total, it will cost taxpayers $1.25 billion to build, maintain and operate the new Bills stadium over the 30-year length of the lease.


Jim Heaney opines on the proposed stadium lease


Atlanta also contributes money annually to maintenance and renovations of Mercedes-Benz Stadium, but the public contributed less in construction costs, just $200 million. The total public investment there is around $700 million.

More than half of the public’s $850 million contribution to build the Bills stadium — $432 million — will come through the sale of 30-year bonds, meaning the county and state will borrow that money and pay it back over the coming decades.

Under terms spelled out in a memorandum of understanding between the state, county and team, the Bills could walk away at any time, unless a judge blocked them. If they leave in the first 15 years, they would have to pay the state and county the $850 million invested to construct the stadium and another $13.3 million in capital and operating assistance for every year they occupy the stadium.

If the team moved after 15 years, the penalties would “steadily” decrease, according to state officials.


Donate to support our nonprofit newsroom


Bradbury, the Kenneshaw State professor, said it’s bad economics to issue 30-year bonds to pay for a stadium when the Bills could leave prior to year 30.

“Normally, if you’re planning to pay off a stadium over 30 years, you need to lock them in for 30 years,” he said.

Gawlik, the attorney with Empire State Development, argued that the state believes the Bills will stay for the entire lease and that a lease extension will come prior to that.

“They’d have to break the lease and try to leave,” he said. “In the first 15 years they’d have to pay every penny back. which is going to be close to $1 billion. and then [years] 15 through 30 it goes down yearly.”

That penalty might not be cost-prohibitive, given the escalating value of NFL franchises. Terry and Kim Pegula bought the Bills in 2014 for $1.4 billion. Today, the team is worth an estimated $3.4 billion. NFL franchise values have increased about 15 percent annually in recent years.

As Investigative Post reported last week, a $1 billion penalty for moving the Bills out of Western New York may not be as steep of a price as state officials believe because of the soaring value of team franchises.

“Talk is cheap,” Bradbury said, “especially when there’s a question of who the ownership might be, which you should always assume regardless of the health of your owners. That’s why you need to protect yourself. ‘Oh they’re not going to [leave].’ They will.”

Lease terms in other cities

Six NFL stadiums have opened since 2010, and five of them have been publicly subsidized to varying degrees.

Las Vegas lured the Raiders in 2020 from their longtime home in Oakland to Allegiant Stadium. The lease mandates the team pay back the full public investment of $717 million if the team relocated during the first 23 years of the 30-year lease.

Payments begin to decrease after year 23, said Brian Haynes, a spokesperson for the Las Vegas Stadium Authority.

The lease also requires a new owner to finish out the lease, in the event the team is sold, Haynes said. The stadium authority also has the right to veto any request from the team to relocate.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter


The lease on the San Francisco 49ers stadium in Santa Clara, California, is similar to the one in Buffalo: The team must pay back $850 million if it relocates. But the penalty stays in place longer — 25 years, rather than the 15 years in Buffalo.

The Falcons’ lease on their stadium in Atlanta does not permit discussions about relocation for 25 years. If the team were to move prior to that, the team could be liable for paying up to $350 million of the public investment.

The lease on the Vikings stadium in Minneapolis does not permit termination over its 30-year lifespan except in the event of fraud, bankruptcy or the failure of either the team or stadium authority to meet certain financial obligations.

“The Vikings have no right to relocate during the initial 30-year term,” said Lisa Niess, a spokesperson for U.S. Bank Stadium. “It would be a total breach of their contract.”

MetLife Stadium in New Jersey was opened in 2010, built with private money, but located on state-owned land. The Giants and Jets play there. The lease requires that at least one of the teams remain there for at least 39 years.

That deal works like this: Both the Jets and Giants must play at MetLife Stadium for a minimum of 15 years. If one team leaves after that, the other is locked in through year 39 of the lease. If both teams stay after year 15, both have the option to leave every five years, with the same terms applying.

Both teams have the option to play at MetLife Stadium for a total of 97 years, with the lease ultimately expiring in 2107, at the latest.

Only California’s SoFi Stadium, home to the Los Angeles Rams and the Los Angeles Chargers, was built entirely with private money and therefore isn’t  subject to a lease with a non-relocation clause.


Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram & YouTube


Gawlik, while saying the lease on the stadium here will keep the team in Buffalo, noted that taxpayers will be made whole if the Bills were to leave.

“The idea behind it is the state and county will get their money back. We’re not going to be out anything if they try to leave.”

Bradbury said the relocation terms in other teams’ leases suggests Western New York should have gotten stronger terms from the Bills.

“It sounds to me like it’s not as stringent as some of the better clauses that lock teams in have been written,” he said.

The post ‘Weak’ relocation clause in Bills’ lease appeared first on Investigative Post.

Related articles

Buffalo announces resignation of Finance Commissioner

https://www.youtube.com/embed/i18aJQZm0HU

Donald Trump – Trump says stock market drove his 2025 income gains, but the majority came from crypto

"You know why I'm profiting? Because the stock market's going up. ... I'm profiting because I have a lot of money and a lot of cash."

CNN Guest Warns Birthright Debate Isn’t Over: Every ‘GOP Candidate Is Going to Run On’ It

Axios' Alex Thompson warned CNN viewers the debate about birthright citizenship is far from over, and that the topic will be a big one during the 2026 midterms.

The post CNN Guest Warns Birthright Debate Isn’t Over: Every ‘GOP Candidate Is Going to Run On’ It first appeared on Mediaite.

Sleazy Trump destroyed hope of national glory in a single phone call



First, full disclosure: I’m not a soccer fan. I'm a football fan, and a diehard Pittsburgh Steelers fan. So, having said that, let’s start with a hypothetical.

Say the Steelers are heading into a playoff game and their best defensive player just got suspended for a hit the league ruled illegal.

Team owner Art Rooney doesn't like the call. So he picks up the phone, calls NFL commissioner Roger Goodell directly, and leans on him to “take another look.” Two days later, the league reverses course. The suspension is lifted. The player suits up. The Steelers win.

If that happened, I'd be thrilled, and I would not be asking a single question about how it all went down. Because Art Rooney owns the Steelers. Roger Goodell runs Rooney's league. That's a phone call between people inside the same house, playing by rules (well, I would hope they are) that belong to them.

Nobody outside that room would have any right to be outraged, except, of course, if you were a Baltimore Ravens fan. But I digress.

Now here's a real story about how another phone call went down.

Last Thursday, U.S. striker Folarin Balogun picked up a red card during Team USA's win over Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was a foul serious enough to draw an automatic one-match ban, which would have kept him out of tonight’s knockout match against Belgium.

Balogun is the team's leading scorer at this World Cup. Losing him for a win-or-go-home game felt, to a lot of American fans, like a gut punch. Donald Trump decided to meddle. He called FIFA president Gianni Infantino and asked him to "review" the card. My bet? Trump didn’t say the word "review."

On Sunday, FIFA announced the suspension was being set aside, not overturned outright, mind you, but "suspended for a probationary period," a wobbly phrase that bounces off the head and goes out of bounds. It all screams corruption, which America, and the world now knows, is Donald Trump’s middle name.

In the Oval Office on Monday, Trump bragged about what he did. Balogun will start against Belgium tonight, and the world is seething with anger — or at least most of the world.

Now, here's the difference from my Steelers story: Donald Trump doesn't own Team USA. He isn't its coach, its federation president, or anyone with legitimate standing to intervene in a disciplinary process.

I highly doubt Trump is even a soccer fan because it’s not bloody and gory like a UFC match.

He's, gallingly, the President of the United States, and he’s calling the head of an independent global sports body four days before his own country's must-win game. It reeks of favoritism, stacking the deck, and dissing every other team in the tournament.

Let’s do another hypothetical.

What if Belgium's star goalkeeper, Thibaut Courtois, received a red card during the team’s win over Senegal, and Belgium’s Prime Minister, Bart De Wever, called Infantino and asked him to review Courtois’ red card? That request would stand a snowball's chance in hell.

The last time something like this happened, when a red card suspension was famously bypassed following presidential intervention, was during the 1962 World Cup, when Brazilian star winger Garrincha was cleared to play in the final after political pressure.

There is a reason the last time this happened was 64 years ago, and I don’t think I need to explain why.

Once the suspension was lifted, all hell broke loose.

This time, Belgium's football federation called the reversal "unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable." They appealed the decision, but guess what? They were denied. Go figure!

Former English soccer star and BBC analyst Wayne Rooney called it "an absolute disgrace." Another English former star and current NBC Sports analyst Gary Neville said it "absolutely stinks."

Once politics — or, in this case, the sleazy Trump — gets involved, who knows where or how it stops?

None of this should surprise anyone who's watched Infantino suck up to Trump. He slavishly and ridiculously handed Trump the tournament's first-ever "Peace Prize" last December and has spent months building political cover for him. Infantino runs a federation about to post record profits hosting the biggest live sports event on earth, and Trump is his money ticket because the games are happening here in the U.S.

If Infantino said no to Trump, would Trump sic FCC Chair Brendon Carr on him and threaten the cash cow of broadcasting rights? Maybe that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but who knows what the impulsive Trump would do?

It’s a wash, though, since Infantino would change Trump’s diaper if he were asked to.

What makes this so combustible is that it's split fans into three camps. So once again, Donald Trump sows unparalleled division.

American fans who just want their team to win are thrilled because Balogun is irreplaceable, and losing him felt like getting robbed.

Other American fans, the ones who think the undisciplined Trump has no business anywhere near a disciplinary ruling, are embarrassed, and plenty of them are openly rooting for Belgium tonight because Donald Trump inserted himself, again, into a situation where he does not belong.

And fans overseas, many already furious at what Trump's tariffs and uncalled-for Iran war have done to their economies, see this as one more example of the evil Trump being the loathsome Trump. They hate America and Americans because they voted for Trump.

Tonight, they're not just rooting against a soccer team. They're rooting against Trump and against a country they feel put him back in office.

We have now drifted so far away from whether the original red card was the right call. If the U.S. wins tonight, plenty of people around the world will say it wasn't earned, and that with Trump’s intervention, the U.S. cheated.

The U.S. will be the team the whole world roots against.

If the U.S. loses, just as many will call it karma. Either way, the team can't win without controversy. Trump made sure of that, then made it worse by bragging about it afterward, thanking FIFA for "reversing a great injustice."

Whatever the final score says tonight in Seattle, it won't tell the real story. The real story is that once again, everything Donald Trump touches ends up poisoned by Donald Trump, and a tournament that was supposed to belong to the world now has his dirty fingerprints all over it.

If anyone deserves a red card — a permanent one — it’s Donald Trump.