The Buffalo News is hemorrhaging journalists

When Warren Buffett sold The Buffalo News, employees took solace in the fact the new owners could have been worse. I did, too. At least it wasn’t Alden Global Capital, the Darth Vader of newspaper chains.

Nearly three years into the new regime, it’s becoming apparent that it might as well have been Alden, as Lee Enterprises is following the same playbook.

Cut the staff.

Sell off the real estate.

Strip the business of what other assets can be liquidated. 

Last week, four newsroom employees, with a collective 130 years of experience, “retired.” It was that or see less-tenured colleagues laid off. They included two marquee reporters, Bob McCarthy, who covered politics, and Matt Spina, a crackerjack investigative reporter. Also gone are respected lifestyles writer Susan Martin and veteran news editor Paul Ehret.

Along with the departures came word that The News would not be filling at least two vacant reporting positions. The News has previously failed to replace Tom Prohaska, a workhorse reporter who covered Niagara County. The photography staff was trimmed from seven to five last year and the job of photo editor was eliminated. A vacant night sports editor’s position will not be filled. And Jerry Zremski, the paper’s stellar Washington correspondent, moved to part-time status last year. 

You get the picture.


Donate to support our nonprofit newsroom


Yet more staff reductions are coming. On the day the newsroom said goodbye to McCarthy and Co., management informed the Buffalo Newspaper Guild that it was exercising its contractual right to outsource the work of the paper’s five-person design desk. That ax will fall no later than mid-June. The work will be done at a Lee design hub located out of state.

To put the cuts in perspective, newsroom employment peaked at The News somewhere north of 200 back in the 1980s. When I left in 2011, it was down to about 145. 

Today, the newsroom staff is 66 full-timers, including 11 in management, plus five part-timers. Come June, the FTE count will be 63.5. 

To be fair, The News under Lee has hired some reporters, some pretty good ones at that. Charlie Specht is a case in point. But the trend is unmistakable, and ominous. 

Fewer reporters means less news coverage and with the exception of reporting on the Bills and Sabres, practically every other aspect of the paper’s coverage has been scaled back. 

The impacts of the staff cutbacks aren’t lost on the leadership of the Buffalo Newspaper Guild, whose members include journalists in the newsroom.

“Quality local news requires investment, and Lee Enterprises is doing the exact opposite of that right now,” Guild President Jon Harris told me last week.

The disinvestment isn’t limited to staffing.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter


Lee, following the Alden playbook of stripping assets, wrestled the Guild’s pension plan away from the union in contract talks last year. Benefits were frozen and the plan’s $40 million in excess funds, which grew over the years because of Buffett’s deft management of the pension plan, were shifted to solidify the pension plans of other Lee newspapers.

Taking yet another page out of the Alden playbook, Lee last year struck a deal to sell The News building at the corner of Washington and Scott streets. The deal is pending, and the sales price hasn’t been disclosed, but the building is assessed at $9 million. (The News now operates out of Howard Zemsky’s Larkin and Exchange building.)

Do the math and it appears Lee will extract about $50 million from The News in three years while making deep cuts in the staff, newsroom and otherwise.

“We know what Lee Enterprises is getting out of The Buffalo News,” Harris said. “We’re wondering what Buffalo is getting out of Lee Enterprises.”

The post The Buffalo News is hemorrhaging journalists appeared first on Investigative Post.

Related articles

Buffalo Central Terminal: A Hub of Summer Fun!

The Buffalo Central Terminal is gearing up for a summer filled with excitement and community spirit! This architectural marvel, not just a relic of the

‘David Dennison’: Trump’s use of fake name in Stormy Daniels agreement puzzles experts



Donald Trump's use of a pseudonym in a non-disclosure agreement with adult movie actress Stormy Daniels has left legal experts bewildered.

The fact that he’s identified by the name David Dennison in the paperwork has confused lawyers, particularly as everything in an NDA is confidential — including the identities of those involved.

Daniels is named in the agreement as Peggy Peterson.

The NDA secured the silence of Daniels over a sexual relationship the pair allegedly had. Trump is currently on trial over business fraud allegations concerning a payment he’s accused of making to Daniels to buy her silence.

"It is unusual for a non-disclosure agreement to use pseudonyms as the agreement itself would be subject to the confidentiality clauses within it," New York lawyer Colleen Kerwick told Newsweek.

The NDA lists the fake names throughout, Newsweek reported. The two were only identified by their real names in a section that was meant only for their lawyers to see.

ALSO READ: A criminologist explains how Americans achieve a post-Trump democracy

Daniels’ lawyer, Keith Davidson, gave evidence in Trump’s trial earlier this week that he drafted the agreement, in which he said his client used the name Peggy Peterson, taking P for plaintiff, and he chose Trump's moniker using D for defendant.

The Dennison name came from a high school colleague of Davidson’s, he said.

"Using a John Doe name isn't a crime, but it's a building block for a case about a cover-up,” Kerwick told Newsweek.

“It was never a crime to purchase the intellectual property rights in someone's story. The alleged crime is the falsification of records to cover it up."

The use of the fake name also got attention from MSNBC correspondent Katie Phang, who wrote on X, "Why would Trump use a pseudonym in a confidential settlement agreement unless he was trying to HIDE something?"

Trump has denied all 34 charges against him.

Busted: Federal regulator hearing complaint against Ted Cruz has one of his yard signs



The regulator set to hear a campaign finance complaint about Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) has a yard sign for the senator's campaign at his house, reported the San Antonio Current on Wednesday.

"Trey Trainor, an attorney serving on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) — the panel scheduled to hear the complaint — recently retweeted a photo his wife Lucy Trainor shared of a yard sign outside their Austin-area home promoting the Texas Republican's campaign for a third term in the U.S. Senate," said the report. "'Got my new ⁦@tedcruz⁩ yard sign installed today,' Lucy Trainor tweeted April 19, 10 days after a pair of campaign-finance watchdogs filed their FEC complaint against Cruz. Trey Trainor retweeted the image the same day his wife posted it."

Per federal contribution records, Trainor also made three contributions to Cruz in 2013, totaling to $325.

ALSO READ: Revealed: What government officials privately shared about Trump not disclosing finances

"Trainor's retweet follows last month's report by the Current that FEC Chairman Sean J. Cooksey served as Cruz's deputy chief counsel in 2018. From 2019 until joining the FEC in 2020, Cooksey served as general counsel for Missouri U.S. Senator Josh Hawley, a GOP hardliner frequently aligned with Cruz," noted the report. "Both Trainor and Cooksey are Trump appointees to the six-member FEC, which is comprised of equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats."

The complaint in question stems from iHeartMedia, which hosts Cruz's podcast, making a $630,000 payment to Truth and Courage PAC, which supports Cruz. Senate rules prohibit senators from accepting greater than "nominal value" gifts from companies that employ lobbyists, as iHeartMedia does.

Cruz, for his part, denies that anything about this arrangement is unlawful.

The senator has personally challenged campaign finance laws in the past. For instance, in 2022, after he ran afoul of a law that limited how much he could pay himself back with campaign contributions for money he loaned to his own campaign, he got the Supreme Court to toss out the law altogether.