Schumer Pushes Families Fly Together Act

Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) is urging the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to investigate and address the issue of airlines charging parents junk fees just to sit next to their children on flights. Schumer said that this practice is unacceptable and should be stopped.

“With record Thanksgiving travel expected this year across America, it is unacceptable that airlines would charge extra $$$ just to sit with their kids,” said Schumer in a statement. “Parents should not have to pay a premium to supervise and protect their child on an airplane.

Schumer said that airlines should be required to provide free seating for children under the age of 13 who are traveling with an adult. He also said that airlines should be banned from charging fees for parents to change seat assignments so that they can sit next to their children.

“Airlines are making billions of dollars every year,” Schumer said. “They can afford to do the right thing and provide free seating for children.

Schumer’s call for action comes as airlines are facing increasing scrutiny for their fees. In recent months, the FAA has been investigating a number of airlines for charging unfair and deceptive fees.

Senator Schumer (D-NY) has been a vocal critic of airlines’ practice of charging fees for basic services, such as checking bags and choosing seats. In 2017, he introduced the “Families Fly Together Act,” which would require airlines to allow families with children under 13 to sit together without having to pay an extra fee.

The bill has been passed by the House of Representatives, but it has stalled in the Senate. Schumer has been urging his colleagues to pass the bill, saying that it is “common sense” that families should be able to sit together on flights without having to pay extra.

“This is a simple issue,” Schumer said. “Families should not have to pay extra to sit together on flights. It’s just common sense.

The Families Fly Together Act would require airlines to allow families with children under 13 to sit together without having to pay an extra fee. It would also provide families with the option of choosing seats together during the booking process and also reimburse families who are forced to pay extra to sit together.

Schumer has said that he is confident that the Families Fly Together Act will eventually be passed into law. He has also called on airlines to voluntarily adopt the bill’s provisions, saying that it is the “right thing to do.

As the holiday travel season approaches, Senator Schumer (D-NY) is calling on airlines to make traveling with families less turbulent by creating fee-free family seating. Schumer said that many airlines currently charge families extra fees to sit together, which can make traveling with children even more expensive and stressful.

“It’s time for airlines to stop nickel-and-diming families and create fee-free family seating,” Schumer said in a statement. “Traveling with children is already stressful enough without having to worry about paying extra fees to sit together.

Schumer said that airlines should follow the lead of Southwest Airlines, which does not charge fees for families to sit together. He also said that the FAA should do more to regulate airlines’ fees.

“The FAA should take action to stop airlines from charging excessive fees for basic services, such as checking bags and choosing seats,” Schumer said. “Families deserve better.

Schumer’s call for action comes as the holiday travel season is expected to be one of the busiest in years. Airlines are already expecting to see a surge in passengers, and Schumer is worried that families will be hit hard by extra fees.

“I urge all airlines to follow Southwest Airlines’ lead and create fee-free family seating,” Schumer said. “It’s the right thing to do for families.

If you are traveling with children this holiday season, be sure to check with your airline about their family seating policies. You may be able to avoid paying extra fees by booking your tickets in advance or choosing seats during the check-in process.

Related articles

Trump REVEALS New Tests as HEALTH COLLAPSES

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Drew Warshaw: New York’s $20 billion in unclaimed funds

Democrat Drew Warshaw, candidate for state comptroller,...

Trump official claims ’50 years of discrimination’ against whites as lawyers flee DOJ



Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon claimed that the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division was guilty of "50 years of discrimination" against white people after about 75% of the agency's lawyers said she was behind a plot to drive them out.

"I think there was some denial and they had crying sessions together," Dhillon told The New York Post this week. "Frankly, it was shocking to them. They had unhappy hours. It was like a lot of drama and handwringing."

"I didn't fire anybody. I just told them they have to approach their job differently. They self-deported with a nice golden parachute from the government."

On Wednesday's appearance on The Charlie Kirk Show, Dhillon encouraged viewers to apply for jobs at the reconstructed Civil Rights Division.

"We just sued Minneapolis for discriminating against teachers who are not minorities and, you know, on and on and on," she promised. "And so we are hiring, and so lawyers with at least 18 months of experience who are interested in serving a tour of duty to help their country."

Charlie Kirk Show producer Andrew Kolvet lamented that white people could soon no longer hold majority status in the U.S.

"Let's say it was 83% white country [in the 1960s]; now we're basically 50%," he noted. "You give that another 10 years, it's going to be probably under 50%, maybe right around 50%. ... When I was born, I think we were around 80% white still."

Dhillon admitted that "we have a history of discrimination in our country."

But she suggested that the courts went too far with a 1971 decision that started the concept of disparate impact.

"So in other words, you no longer necessarily had to prove in your discrimination case, whatever the context was, that you are actually being the victim of intentional discrimination," she remarked. "You could simply prove that there's a hiring process or a policy, or there's certain, you know, tests that are required, and I, because I'm African-American, I can't pass a test."

"We have now issued a guidance that says that this 50 years of discrimination is against frankly law-abiding practices and businesses and recipients is over," she added. "It is harming a lot of people. It is wrong."