Federal workers may get second ‘What did you do last week?’ email

(NewsNation) — Thousands of federal employees could receive a second “What did you do last week?” email from the Trump administration, which might require a response, a source confirmed to NewsNation Friday.

According to the Washington Post, which first reported the news, the message is expected to come from individual agencies rather than the centralized Office of Personnel Management.

On Tuesday, Elon Musk gave federal workers “another chance” to justify their recent accomplishments or risk losing their jobs. Musk’s message followed an initial email asking federal employees to list five things they accomplished last week by 11:59 p.m. Monday.

The directive appeared to contradict guidance from the Office of Personnel Management, which told federal departments and agencies that responses were voluntary. Multiple federal agencies instructed employees to disregard Musk’s initial email, at least temporarily.

There is no word yet on how many federal workers complied with the original directive.

Elon Musk’s ultimatum

Musk, who oversees the Department of Government Efficiency, sent an email to hundreds of thousands of federal employees Saturday, giving them roughly 48 hours to report five specific things they had accomplished during the week prior. In a separate message posted on social media, Musk said any employee who failed to respond by the deadline — set in the email as 11:59 p.m. EST Monday — would lose their job.

The OPM issued a memo Monday to federal departments and agencies stating that it was not mandatory for workers to respond to the email.

The office later clarified that individual agencies must decide if they require responses and determine the consequences of those who fail to do so. It added that agencies should consider whether the “accomplishment bullets” should be integrated into the agency’s weekly activity report.

President Donald Trump signaled his support of Musk early Monday.

DOGE employees resign

Musk’s unusual demand has faced resistance from several key U.S. agencies led by the president’s loyalists — including the FBI, State Department, Homeland Security and the Pentagon — which instructed their employees over the weekend not to comply. Lawmakers in both parties said Musk’s mandate may be illegal, while unions are threatening to sue.

One federal worker from the Department of Health and Human Services shared an email with NewsNation they received Monday night. “No HHS expectation that HHS employees respond to OPM and there is no impact to your employment with the agency if you choose not to respond,” the email read.

If employees did respond, they were advised to tailor their answers as if “malign foreign actors” might read them.

Twenty-one civil service employees resigned from DOGE on Tuesday, saying they refused to use their technical expertise to “dismantle critical public services.”

The employees also warned that many of those enlisted by Musk to help him slash the size of the federal government under Trump’s administration were political ideologues who did not have the necessary skills or experience for the task ahead of them.

Related articles

‘The brink of illegitimacy’: Professors warn no turning back for ‘noxious’ Supreme Court



Two American university professors Friday warned the "noxious" Supreme Court can no longer be saved.

Harvard law professor Ryan Doerfler and Yale law professor Samuel Moyn wrote an opinion piece published by The Guardian about how the high court's legitimacy has been increasingly damaged under President Donald Trump's second term. Conservative justices have handed Trump and the MAGA movement a number of wins, including overturning of Roe v. Wade, "what remains of the Voting Rights Act," and losing its "nonpartisan image."

The role of the court has shifted and with the conservative majority, the liberal justices had previously "proceeded as if their conservative peers would continue to take their own institution’s legitimacy seriously."

But over the last several months, that has also changed.

"Yet with the conservative justices shattering the Supreme Court’s non-partisan image during Trump’s second term, liberals are not adjusting much," Doerfler and Moyn wrote. "The liberal justices – Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor – have become much more aggressive in their dissents. But they disagree with one another about how far to concede that their conservative colleagues have given up any concern for institutional legitimacy. Encouragingly, Jackson pivoted to 'warning the public that the boat is sinking' – as journalist Jodi Kantor put it in a much-noticed reported piece. Jackson’s fellow liberals, though, did not follow her in this regard, worrying her strategy of pulling the 'fire alarm' was 'diluting' their collective 'impact.'"

By now, Trump has used a "shadow docket" of emergency orders to his advantage and to advance his policies.

"Similarly, many liberal lawyers have focused their criticism on the manner in which the Supreme Court has advanced its noxious agenda – issuing major rulings via the 'shadow' docket, without full-dress lawyering, and leaving out reasoning in support of its decisions," according to the writers.

Critics have argued that the conservative-majority Supreme Court, including Trump's appointees, has used the shadow docket to issue consequential rulings on controversial issues like abortion, voting rights, and immigration with minimal explanation or public deliberation, effectively allowing the court to reshape law through expedited procedures that bypass traditional briefing and oral argument requirements.

Now, "progressives are increasingly converging on the idea of both expanding and 'disempowering' federal courts and looking to see how to shake up the status quo."

"Rather than adhere to the same institutionalist strategies that helped our current crisis, reformers must insist on remaking institutions like the US supreme court so that Americans don’t have to suffer future decades of oligarchy-facilitating rule that makes a parody of the democracy they were promised," Doerfler and Moyn wrote.

"In Trump’s second term, the Republican-appointed majority on the Supreme Court has brought their institution to the brink of illegitimacy. Far from pulling it back from the edge, our goal has to be to push it off," the writers added.

New York Young Republican Club gala draws white nationalist, far-right Germans as elected officials skip out

The annual soiree took place as young Republican groups across the country are reeling from POLITICO’s reporting on a racist and antisemitic chat group among prominent leaders.

Buffalo Bills postgame press conference

https://www.youtube.com/embed/LW299rIraNQ