Why Trump blinked

President Donald Trump speaks on the South Portico of the White House on April 9, 2025, in Washington, DC. | Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

After a week of intensifying market turmoil, President Donald Trump stepped back from the brink of financial crisis Wednesday, announcing a 90-day “pause” on the exorbitant tariff levels he’d imposed on dozens of countries.

It was not a total climbdown: Trump intensified a trade war with China by hiking its tariff level up to 125 percent. And he is also keeping in place a 10 percent tariff for other countries. (Details on exactly which countries remained murky as of mid-Wednesday afternoon.) 

But it was a significant step back.

So why did he do it? Why make such a dramatic announcement last week, and walk it back so relatively soon?

Though Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent initially claimed this pivot was part of Trump’s “strategy all along,” many outside observers saw this as market-driven, both because of the timing and because of remarks Trump himself later made (he said he shifted because people were “getting yippy” and “a little bit afraid”).

Since Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement last week, stocks had lost 10 percent of their value. Even more concerning: US treasury bond yields were spiking. Trump’s team had been trying to drive bond yields lower, both so the US government would pay less interest on its debt and so the Federal Reserve would cut rates and lower borrowing costs for Americans. 

Instead, yields went up, in ways that some feared could ripple outward and cause a financial crisis. This wasn’t what the Trump team had expected, so many speculated it was the reason for Trump’s sudden cave. (“The bond market is very tricky,” Trump said Wednesday afternoon. “Last night, people were getting a little queasy.”)

Investors were overjoyed at Trump’s partial walkback, as stocks quickly surged — though not all the way back to their pre-Liberation Day levels (they made up about half of their losses since then). 

This relief may be largely about the seeming confirmation that, contrary to appearances of the past week, Trump is not totally heedless to market reaction and lobbying, disconnected from reality, and willing to wreck the business environment. The shift also suggests that Wall Street-aligned advisers like Bessent have gained the upper hand over anti-trade fanatics like Trump adviser Peter Navarro — for now, at least.

But there will likely be more tumult ahead. Trump’s trade war with China is still on. And though Trump’s team purportedly intends to work out deals with every other country he targeted, it is far from clear how such deals could realistically meet Trump’s (bizarre) goal of bringing the US into trade surplus with every major trading partner.

Furthermore, the chaos and uncertainty Trump caused may have a lasting effect, chilling businesses’ planning and doing damage to the economy. Because if he caused such a mess once, how do we know he won’t do it again?

Related articles

‘Republicans’ worst nightmare’: Analyst warns ‘drunk with power’ GOP it’s made a stumble



An analyst warns Thursday that GOP lawmakers "drunk with power" have made a major stumble amid the ongoing government shutdown, unleashing "Republicans' worst nightmare."

Salon columnist Heather Digby Parton writes about how Obamacare premiums are set to soar — something President Donald Trump had promised to replace — and now "appears to be one step too far" for Americans.

"Ten years of similar promises have shown that replacing the Affordable Care Act wasn’t so easy after all — and that the only health care plan the GOP ever truly wanted was one called 'you’re on your own,'" Digby Parton writes.

Republicans haven't introduced any alternatives, instead people are receiving notices that their healthcare premiums are set to rise, while they cut Medicaid and close a number of rural hospitals, add work requirements and deny care to millions. And although they've pointed to Project 2025, aiming to force people into a privatized version of Medicaid and "plan to open up the market to sell junk insurance plans which are worth virtually nothing," it's still a half-baked policy, the writer argues.

"But the GOP’s lack of strategy and success makes it clear the party is as flummoxed on this issue as they’ve always been, and they know it’s a loser for them," she writes.

Healthcare matters for Americans because it's something that effects their daily lives, she adds, and "it’s now on the front lines of this massive war against our social safety net."

As the Trump administration works to defund scientific research and following "the government's shambolic response during the first year of the pandemic and the damage being done every day by the administration to our scientific research community, I suspect a lot of people are feeling insecure about their actual health care these days."

That could leave room for Democrats to step in and hold the line.

"If Democrats can find the fortitude to hold out for their demands, they will have taken the first step in reining in this lawless administration and given the American people something to hold onto in these dark days," Digby Parton writes.

The Facts Behind Accusations That Lindt Chocolate Contains Dangerous Heavy Metals

For years, rumors have circulated that some Lindt dark chocolate bars contain unsafe levels of lead and cadmium.