Raw Story

In 2022, Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) privately begged a local Jewish leader in Westchester County for any photographic evidence of the two of them together so he could "show the world I’m friends with Jewish People,” Jewish Insider's Matthew Kassel reported on Tuesday.

This comes as Bowman, a member of the progressive "Squad" who is currently polling behind primary challenger George Latimer, is facing extensive criticism for his handling of issues surrounding the Israel-Hamas war, in a district with a substantial Jewish population.

"The Jewish leader, who described the exchange on the condition of anonymity to protect his privacy, did have at least one photo on hand from a Jewish community gathering in Bowman’s district months earlier at which the then-freshman Democrat had vowed to sign on to a House bill aimed at strengthening the Abraham Accords — a promise he fulfilled just a few days later," wrote Kassel. "But by the time Bowman sent his request to the Jewish leader in an apparent effort to counter mounting dissatisfaction with his record on Israel amid the campaign, the New York legislator had since reversed course and pulled his support for the bill aimed at further normalizing relations between Israel and its Arab neighbors — angering Jewish activists in the district who said they felt blindsided by his abrupt decision."

ALSO READ: ‘They could have killed me’: Trump's so-called 'Seattle whistleblower' finally revealed

The Jewish leader said of the text exchange, “I was uncomfortable. I kind of joked around with him about it. I said, ‘Oh, I’m sure you guys have it. Don’t worry about it.’” He ultimately declined to share the photo.

In recent months, Bowman has triggered outrage after he claimed that "there's no evidence of ... raped women" in Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel that led to over 1,000 people killed and hundreds taken hostage, and that the reports of rape were "propaganda." He later backtracked after U.N. reports found extensive evidence of sexual violence committed by Hamas terrorists.

This also comes as Bowman has been criticized for old writings in which he pushed a number of conspiracy theories, including 9/11 trutherism, and a YouTube channel where he followed Flat Earther accounts and the screeds of the antisemitic Black supremacist Louis Farrakhan — as well as a bizarre incident in which he pulled a fire alarm in a House office building.

Alt-right Freedom Caucus chair Rep. Bob Good took a surprising jab at former President Donald Trump ahead of a Virginia primary that has more resting on it than his own claim to power, according to a new report.

Good — who will find out Tuesday how his staunch Trump support matches up against a political outsider who has the former president's endorsement in Virginia's 5th Congressional district — shared his views on a cease and desist letter he received from the former president over campaign signs.

“I’m not talking about stupid topics," Good told Politico Tuesday. "That’s a stupid topic.”

Good's opinion stands in contrast to Trump's, who ordered his lawyers late last month to take action against the Virginia Republican he has declared is "bad."

ALSO READ: EXCLUSIVE: House Republicans subpoena ex-Capitol Police intel head for Jan. 6 inquiry

At question was Good's usage of Trump's name on his campaign yard signs, despite the former president's endorsement of former Navy SEAL John McGuire.

"That is a fraud on the donors," lawyers told Good.

Good has maintained his support for Trump notwithstanding and created what one political analyst described as a civil war within Trumpworld, pitting MAGA bigwigs such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Steve Bannon against each other.

Politico's Olivia Beavers argued the conclusion of Tuesday's primary could reverberate beyond Virginia and signal a dark future for the MAGA movement as a whole.

"If Rep. Bob Good were to lose, he would be the first sitting chair in the Freedom Caucus’ nearly decade-long history to be defeated — a loss that would embolden critics of the increasingly fractious bloc," she wrote.

"If he wins, he’ll have done it despite strong opposition from former (and possibly future) President Donald Trump and only mild backing from Republican leaders, including House Speaker Mike Johnson — signaling friction ahead."

Former President Donald Trump is dragging the whole Republican Party off a cliff with his "bone-headed" proposal to replace income taxes with tariffs on imported goods, wrote Catherine Rampell for The Washington Post.

Economists have broadly panned the idea, warning that it would amount to a massive tax increase for everyone but the ultra-rich, by making everything more expensive, and would make maintaining government revenue for essential services impossible.

But the GOP has closed ranks around the idea, with RNC spokesperson Anna Kelly saying, “The notion that tariffs are a tax on U.S. consumers is a lie pushed by outsourcers and the Chinese Communist Party.”

It's not a lie at all, said Rampell.

"Multiple careful studies found that the costs of those tariffs were either mostly or entirely passed on to Americans in the form of higher prices. A more recent analysis estimated that his new tariff proposals would cost the median U.S. household an additional $1,700 per year," wrote Rampell. "But the modern GOP being what it is, party apparatchiks must defend every bone-headed idea their presumptive presidential nominee utters. Thus, critics must be 'outsourcers' (which seems unlikely for most economists, who rarely own manufacturing plants) or, naturally, Marxists."

"The expected costs of Trump’s recent tariff proposals would be staggering," she continued. "For example, his plan for a universal 10 percent tariff coupled with a 60 percent tariff on Chinese goods would more than wipe out any savings most Americans would get from extending his 2017 income tax cuts, according to estimates from the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

ALSO READ: ‘They could have killed me’: Spycraft, ballots and a Trumped-up plot gone haywire

The bottom 80 percent of households would see a tax increase on net." Meanwhile, we would be losing $3 trillion in tax revenue per year, and there's no way to make that much from tariffs — $3 trillion is roughly the total value of all the goods we import annually.

The worst part of it all, wrote Rampell, is that while Trump at least had some sensible advisers last time pushing back on ideas like this, he is setting himself up now to have an army of loyalists at his disposal who will obey his every command.

"Project 2025, a Trump-aligned group, is already screening a more professionalized army of second-term loyalists, all of whom will obediently execute Trump’s orders, and dot their I’s and cross their T’s — on trade and everything else," she wrote. "Unless they’re also secret communists, of course."

Alan Dershowitz thinks a Hunter Biden acquittal would heal America as it would prove former President Donald Trump's guilty verdict to be a "laughing stock."

"The best thing that could possibly happen to Donald Trump is if Hunter Biden gets acquitted," the Harvard law professor emeritus said Monday night during an appearance on Fox News's "Hannity". "Because the evidence against Hunter Biden is so much more compelling of the legal issues which were compelling than anything against Donald Trump and it will prove beyond any doubt that this is all about where the trial was conducted and that if you're Trump and you're tried in New York, it'ss automatic guilt, and if you're Biden and you're tried in Delaware — it's a different bird."

He continued: "The best thing that could possibly happen to Donald Trump is the acquittal of the Biden base... it would also be a good thing for America.

"It would uncover and disclose the horrible double standard that our criminal justice system is going through; maybe we can get some reform. Maybe we can do something about it."

Last week, Trump became the first former American president to be convicted of felony crimes when New York jurors found him guilty of all 34 charges in a conspiracy to cover up a plot to unlawfully corrupt the 2016 election by shielding six-figure hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, who said they had sex.

Trump has denied the two had an affair and vowed to appeal after he's sentenced July 11.

A jury was deliberating Monday in the federal gun case against Hunter Biden where he stands accused of using drugs but lying about it on a gun application back in 2018.

The 54-year-old also accomplished a first by being criminally prosecuted as the son of a sitting U.S. president.

For Dershowitz, who defended Trump when he was impeached back on 2019, the verdict has indelibly shaken his trust in the law itself.

"I've been able to 60 years of my life to try to defend and explain the legal system based on neutral principles," he said. "That legal system is gone. The trump case destroyed it.

"And if there were an acquittal in this case, at least it will expose that."

Dershowitz added that America is not a pillar in the law but being pilloried after last week's conviction.

"Right now our criminal justice system is the laughingstock of the world and i feel you're so horrible about it," he said.

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump are seeking a delay in his classified documents case, saying it needs time to find potential experts because one who was under consideration notified the defense over the weekend they could not work on the case.

In court documents obtained Monday night by Politico, the defense seeks an extension of the deadline for expert disclosures until July 8. The current deadline is June 10, as previously set by the court.

"Defense counsel have been diligently working to identify and engage potential expert witnesses, but the process is not complete," Trump's team said, noting the recent six-week hush money trial in New York City "made the timing of the expert-notice deadline challenging."

Additionally, Trump's team said it was considering a potential expert who notified them over the weekend that they could not work on this case.

"We are in discussions with other potential experts, but given the need to confirm that witnesses are conflict-free and able to complete the engagement process, we have been unable to finalize our expert engagements by today’s deadline," the court filing said.

The defense said it has been reviewing recent productions of classified and unclassified evidence from the Special Counsel's office, and it plans to disclose to prosecutors Monday night the topics of expert testimony it intends to present at trial.

The Special Counsel's Office opposed the extension, noting the defense already received two previous extensions and has had notice of the government's experts for nearly five months.

"The Government assumes that this is the only expert Trump intends to notice, because otherwise there is no reason he could not designate the other experts now," Christopher M. Kise wrote in response.

Several criminal defense organizations believe former President and convicted felon Donald Trump received cushy treatment.

Various defense attorneys and legal advocacy groups cried foul following Trump's pre-sentencing interview, in which he was permitted to have attorney Todd Blanche present and allowed to virtually answer questions, rather than the more commonplace in-person conditions.

"This is just another example of our two-tiered system of justice," read the statement issued by The Legal Aid Society, The Bronx Defenders, New York County Defender Services, and Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem, according to Business Insider.

The four New York City-based public-defender organizations said Monday: "All people convicted of crimes should be allowed counsel in their probation interview, not just billionaires."

Blanche's attendance raised Thomas Eddy's eyebrows.

"In fairness, at least when clients are detained pending sentence, it will be a procedural nightmare to permit attorneys to attend," Rochester, New York defense attorney Thomas Eddy, told Business Insider. "How much trouble do you think Trump would get into today if Blanche wasn't there to muzzle him?".

Ivette Davila-Richards, deputy press secretary for Mayor Eric Adams' office, denied to the outlet that Trump was given white glove treatment, stating: "It's common — it's not unusual, and it's been an option from even before COVID."

"No exceptions are being made because it's President Trump," Davila-Richards said.

The president was said to have answered questions for less than 30 minutes with a probation officer.

“Earlier today, President Trump completed a routine interview with [the] New York Probation Office. The interview was uneventful and lasted less than thirty minutes,” a source familiar with the proceedings told CNN, adding: “The President and his team will continue to fight the lawless Manhattan DA Witch Hunt.”

The interview is part of a fact-finding process to build a case for the recommendation of punishment for Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan to use when he's expected to sentence the former president and presumptive Republican nominee for president on July 11.

Trump was found guilty of all 34 counts of falsifying business records for scheming to hide payments to porn star Stormy Daniels who alleged a tryst with him back in 2006 inside of a Lake Tahoe, California, hotel room.

Trump denies the affair and has vowed to appeal.