Poloncarz Blasts Legislative Republicans for Blocking Lawsuit Settlement Plan

County Executive Mark C. Poloncarz blasted the Erie County (“County”) Legislature’s Republican Caucus for their display of political gamesmanship at its worst in blocking a plan to pay a $7 million legal settlement and putting the County at risk of incurring hundreds of thousands of dollars in interest penalty charges and jeopardizing its ability to pay settlements related to other preexisting lawsuits.

“In rejecting the compromise plan I have put before them, the Legislature Republicans have made it entirely clear they are more interested in ‘Washington-Style’ political gamesmanship than acting in a fiscally responsible manner and getting this settlement paid before the March 5th deadline,” said Poloncarz. “It is time to put petty politics aside and do what is in their constituent’s best interests before it is too late.”

In early January, Republicans rejected the prior administration’s initial request to borrow $7 million in a low-interest judgment bond to cover the cost of the lawsuit settlement, instead putting forth a plan that would designate $3 million from the County’s risk retention fund (“Risk”), while borrowing the rest ($4 million). While Poloncarz has come to the table several times offering compromises of $6 million borrowed and $1 million Risk, $5.5 million borrowed and $1.5 million Risk and now today, $5 million borrowed and $2 million Risk, Republicans have refused to compromise and move from their initial proposal.

Poloncarz added, “While I have come to the table several times, the Republicans have unreasonably refused to compromise based on one bogus claim after another. The latest claim is that they are saving taxpayers hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in interest charges associated with the judgment bond. In reality, their hardline stance is over a little more than $4,000 a year, while they insist on gambling with about $200,000 in interest penalty charges. How is that a compromise or fiscally responsible?”

A $5 million judgment bond would require a total debt service of $301,958.33 (which includes interest and the cost of issuance), while a $4 million bond’s debt service would cost $260,250.00, a difference of $41,708. Over the 5 year life of the bond, that would amount to $8,341.67 a year. Coupled with the $4,000 in interest lost due to non-investment of $1 million in conjunction with the Republican’s plan, the net taxpayer savings are reduced to $4,341.67 a year.

As per the terms of the stipulated settlement, if the $7 million settlement payment is not remitted to the plaintiff by the March 5, 2012 deadline, the County will immediately incur a $155,342 interest penalty with an additional $1,726.03 in penalty charges each day thereafter. The legislature will have one last opportunity to approve a plan on February 23, 2012, before the payment deadline. If a plan is still blocked by Republican inaction, the next Legislative Session will not be until March 15, 2012, ten days after the deadline, which would mean at least $172,602 in penalty charges would be assessed before a potential resolution.

While designating an additional $1 million out of Risk (as the Republicans have proposed) rather than borrowing does not lead to any real interest savings, it also has the negative effect of jeopardizing the County’s ability to pay settlements for the hundreds of preexisting lawsuits initiated by the previous administration. Currently, the risk retention fund has approximately $5.5 million and under the Republican proposal that would be reduced down to $2.5 million.

Poloncarz concluded, “Not only does their unreasonable refusal to compromise not save the taxpayers any actual interest, but it also puts in jeopardy the County’s ability to self-insure itself against lawsuits by depleting the fund to pay settlements below what is necessary. The Republicans are holding this agreement hostage and putting the County at an unnecessary risk just to prove a point. I would think they would hold taxpayer dollars in higher regard than that.”

Related articles

‘I answered!’ GOP senator snaps when pressed on Trump’s $45M military parade



Nearly a dozen Republican senators reacted with visible discomfort Wednesday as they snapped, stared into space and retreated into elevators, rather than face questions about President Donald Trump's $45 million military parade, HuffPost reported.

Sen. Todd Young (R-IN) wasn’t having it.

“Nope,” he said when asked if he planned on attending the Saturday spectacle, which is set to include warplanes, tanks and a multimillion-dollar military parade on the National Mall. When pressed on the cost, the Indiana lawmaker pivoted.

“I’m focused on the trillions right now, which is the reconciliation bill,” Young said. But when HuffPost pointed out he hadn’t answered the question, Young snapped: “I answered the question I wanted to answer!”

Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE) said she wouldn’t be in Washington, D.C., then gazed blankly into a Senate elevator as its doors closed after remarking, “But I wish I was.”

Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC) stayed silent for eight seconds, grinned, and slipped into another elevator when asked his thoughts on the parade on Wednesday, HuffPost reported.

“No comment,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said. “No comment.” While Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) simply said she doesn’t “do hallway interviews.” HuffPost pointed out in its report Wednesday that “most conversations with the press happen in Senate hallways.”

Saturday’s parade – an event that will honor both the Army’s 250th anniversary and Trump's own 79th birthday – will feature thousands of troops, tanks and aircraft rolling through the streets of D.C.. While Republicans have long railed against government waste, especially in the face of recent DOGE-related efforts, few in the GOP have publicly criticized the upcoming display.

Only Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) spoke out among the group of 14 GOP senators the outlet spoke to – not just because of the steep price – but also because he doesn’t consider “the symbolism of tanks and missiles” to be representative of what the United States is all about.

Teachers union president Randi Weingarten resigns from DNC

“I appear to be out of step with the leadership you are forging,” she wrote in a letter to DNC Chair Ken Martin.

‘What the hell?’ Morning Joe shames GOP senator over ‘wacko’ social media post



MSNBC's Joe Scarborough blasted Sen. Mike Lee's (R-UT) Monday over his response to the shootings of two Democratic state legislators and their spouses.

The Republican senator blamed Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for the assassination of former House speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark and the wounding of state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette. Vance Boelter, an apparent religious conservative and Donald Trump supporter, has been accused of the attacks.

The "Morning Joe" host was appalled by Lee's social media post.

"One politician, and I will say a man that I've known and in the past have had a good relationship, and, like, seemed like a soft- spoken man, but somebody that posted this weekend, Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, obviously facing strong criticism for social media posts about the Minnesota shooting suspect," Scarborough said.

"Yesterday, Lee posted a picture of the suspect at the door of one of the lawmakers with the caption, 'This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way.' It is a pinned tweet at the top of his page, [and] 25 minutes later, the senator posted another picture of the suspected shooter with the caption, 'Nightmare on Walz Street,' mocking, of course, the situation with the name of the Minnesota governor. This post came hours before Lee tweeted a 'Happy Fathers Day' message."

"'What the hell is Mike Lee doing?'" Scarborough added, quoting conservative journalist Brad Polumbo. "'Has he completely lost it?'"

Lee faced widespread condemnation, and Scarborough added his own by stating that he would have thought the senator was above that sort of social media trolling.

"We're used to wackos on the extremes on both sides posting bizarre things on social media," Scarborough said. "What happens when it's mainstreamed by a senator? Again, a guy that I've known and used to try to be a thoughtful, conservative voice for small-government conservatism.

"When he starts posting things like this, and what is the, what's the United States Senate's answer to that? I only ask that because I can tell you back in my day, I guess in the Stone Age it is now, I mean, the senator on either side would have been roundly condemned by members of his or her own party if they had done this."

Watch the video below or at this link.


- YouTube youtu.be

FED UP Navy Vets DROP THE HAMMER on Trump LOSING

When loyalty to Trump trumps national security,...

Lindsey Graham Blasts Pete Hegseth For Comment About Putin: ‘This is the 1930s All Over!’

Graham delivered a sharp rebuke of Pete Hegseth over what he saw as a dangerously soft assessment of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intentions.

The post Lindsey Graham Blasts Pete Hegseth For Comment About Putin: ‘This is the 1930s All Over!’ first appeared on Mediaite.