Discriminatory Housing Advertisements

Recently many people saw and shared a discriminatory Craigslist posting for a house on Buffalo’s West Side. The advertisement was explicitly racist, saying that the poster did not want people of certain races or ethnicities to apply to rent the house. After being notified of the posting, Western New York’s fair housing agency, Housing Opportunities Made Equal (HOME), conducted an investigation. The results of that investigation strongly suggest that the advertisement was not authentic. As Craigslist posts are anonymous, the actual poster is unknown, but the individuals whose phone numbers are included in the posting do not own or rent that property. Moreover, HOME’s investigation discovered additional Craigslist postings that target these individuals but were unrelated to housing.

While this particular advertisement appears fraudulent, HOME appreciates those who were outraged by the posting and sought to address the very real issue of discriminatory housing advertisements. For every fake ad, there are dozens of authentic ones, and HOME will investigate any discriminatory advertisements that are brought to its attention. Many of these discriminatory advertisements express a preference for or against a certain type of tenant, specify a certain number of people allowed to live in a unit, or state that the landlord does not accept Section 8 vouchers or other public assistance. All of these statements are discriminatory, and are just as unlawful as the sentiments expressed in this racist posting. Anyone who encounters a discriminatory housing advertisement is encouraged to share it with HOME via their social media accounts or using the “Report Discrimination” tool on homeny.org.

Related articles

Special Board Meeting – 7/20/2026

Special Board Meeting - 7/20/2026

REVIEW: At Chin Hills, my new Korean favorite wins me over

If you’ve followed my reviews over the last 13...

John Fetterman poised to flip and become Republican ‘majority-maker’: ex-chief of staff



Sen. John Fetterman's increasingly independent political moves are drawing concern from Senate colleagues and raising questions about whether the Pennsylvania Democrat might eventually leave his party.

Fetterman said last week he would formally switch his party affiliation if Democrats make opposition to Israel part of their official platform — the first time he's laid out specific conditions for departing – and he pointed to recent contested primaries as evidence the party is shifting toward candidates who are "intensely anti-Israel," not just critical of its policies.

One Democratic senator, speaking anonymously to NOTUS, said, "I am concerned" about the prospect of Fetterman switching parties unexpectedly.

Fetterman has also set up a joint fundraising committee with Republican Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA), an arrangement that struck colleagues as unusual. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) said he'd "never seen it before." Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-PA), a progressive who has left open the possibility of challenging Fetterman in 2028, called the move "crazy stuff," arguing it helps Republicans in battleground Pennsylvania races.

Fetterman brushed off the arrangement as "nothing sinister," rooted in shared state interests, and fired back at Deluzio over the congressman's earlier campaign donation to Graham Platner, the Maine Senate candidate who dropped out amid a sexual assault allegation he denies.

The senator has increasingly clashed with his party over Israel, the Iran war, and border security, and recently expressed regret for once calling to eliminate the filibuster, praising former Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema for opposing its removal.

His standing among Pennsylvania Democrats has slipped sharply — a Quinnipiac poll found his approval at just 19% among Democrats, with 52 percent of voters overall saying they want him to leave the party.

Adam Jentleson, Fetterman's former chief of staff, said he believes Fetterman might switch parties "in order to stay relevant," particularly if Democrats win a narrow Senate majority in November and Fetterman could become a decisive vote. Jentleson also warned Fetterman could side with Republicans on a future Supreme Court nomination.

“I think, if he is the majority-maker, he will flip, because it would give him a massive amount of attention,” said Jentleson, who last year expressed concerns about Fetterman's mental health.

Other Democrats pushed back on the switching narrative. Sen. Peter Welch noted Fetterman "votes Democratic all the time," while Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) urged him to stay, saying his positions still align more with Democrats than Republicans on balance.

“I would just encourage him to stay,” Heinrich said. “I think you can have policy differences, but on balance, with the exception of one or two issues, when you look at what he cares about, I think that looks a lot more like the Democratic Party than the Republican Party. He’s always, always welcome in our caucus.”