Erie County DA’s Office Warns Public About Potential Charges for Setting Off Illegal Fireworks

Erie County District Attorney John Flynn is reminding residents that setting off fireworks is not only dangerous and disruptive, but also an illegal activity.

The Erie County District Attorney’s Office contacted various law enforcement agencies after receiving complaints from residents throughout Erie County. Police in Amherst, Buffalo, Cheektowaga, Orchard Park, and West Seneca noted an increase in calls about fireworks in recent weeks.

In addition to being a nuisance for neighbors, setting off fireworks in a residential area can have a negative impact on people, animals, and property. Fireworks can cause serious injury or death to people using them or to those nearby. Fireworks are explosives that have the protentional to set fire to nearby homes and other properties. The sound of fireworks can cause distress for individuals with PTSD or other medical conditions, pets, and wildlife.

Potential charges may include:

  • Unlawfully Dealing with Fireworks and Dangerous Fireworks: The sale of illegal fireworks (roman candles, bottle rockets, mines, pyrotechnics, etc.) is a Class “B” misdemeanor. Possession of these illegal fireworks is a violation.
  • Disorderly Conduct: Intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof: making unreasonable noise. This charge is a violation.
  • Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree: Recklessly engaging in conduct which creates a substantial risk of serious physical injury to another person. This charge is a Class “D” felony.
  • Section 293 of the Buffalo City Ordinance prohibits unreasonable noise. Cities, towns, and villages may have a similar ordinance.

Related articles

X posts – No, Arizona election officials aren’t removing ‘50,000 noncitizens from voter rolls’

Arizona Democrats “needed a lawsuit to force them to remove 50,000 noncitizens from voter rolls.”

‘In a bind’: Right-wing Supreme Court justices squirm as case puts them in awkward spot



The Supreme Court is set to hear an Oklahoma case that will force the justices to choose between allowing more religious control of public schools or "respecting the wishes of the Founding Fathers," according to a new article in The Atlantic.

History professor Adam Laats laid out how, "In 2023, the Oklahoma government approved an application from the Catholic Church to create a virtual charter school. Like other charter schools, this one would be funded by taxpayers. But unlike other charter schools, this one would be explicitly religious, teaching students Catholic doctrine."

Laats wrote that Oklahoma’s state attorney general objected on the grounds that the approval violated the state constitution, as well as the U.S. Constitution.

He explained that the Founding Fathers foresaw "he death of public schooling if schools came under the authority of any specific religious denomination, or even if a school appeared to favor one denomination over another."

ALSO READ: 'We’ve made a mistake': Trump’s trade war sends GOP into frenzy

"Oklahoma’s plan for a public school run by the Catholic Church would...fly in the face of the Founding Fathers’ intentions and go against two centuries of American tradition," Laats wrote. "And it puts the six members of the Supreme Court’s conservative majority in a bind. In previous decisions, they have insisted that they will be guided by history, using that rationale to allow for more religion in public schools. In this case, however, if they want to follow their own rules, they must decide in the other direction."

Laats wrote that members of the religious right are "hopeful" about the case that the Supreme Court will hear next week, since SCOTUS has given them "some significant victories in recent years" that were guided by the justices' understanding of history.

"But the case from Oklahoma makes claiming history as a justification harder for the conservative justices," he wrote. "In this case, the history is unambiguous: The Founding Fathers would never have approved of a public school that taught the religious doctrines of one specific kind of Christianity."

Read The Atlantic article here.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Reportedly Mulling 2026 Senate Run and Thinks She Would ‘Crush’ All But One Challenger

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is reportedly considering a run for the US Senate in Georgia next fall as long as she does not have to face Republican Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, according to a Thursday report published by The Daily Caller. Citing two unnamed sources familiar with her thinking, the right-wing outlet reported that […]

The post Marjorie Taylor Greene Reportedly Mulling 2026 Senate Run and Thinks She Would ‘Crush’ All But One Challenger first appeared on Mediaite.

REAL ID deadline looms as DMVs run out of appointments

(NewsNation) — The May 7 deadline for REAL ID...