From judge to justice in 6 weeks: How Schumer got Jackson confirmed

Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin knew exactly when Ketanji Brown Jackson would be confirmed, even weeks before President Joe Biden made his choice: by April 8.

With a fragile 50-50 Democratic majority and an unpredictable pandemic, the majority leader and Judiciary Committee chair mapped out a strategy that went from nomination to confirmation in a six-week sprint, with zero breaks and a specific target date that they decided upon way back in late January. It’s rare for Senate leaders to meet self-prescribed deadlines for huge votes, but Jackson’s historic ascension to become the first Black female Supreme Court justice essentially went through without a hitch.

During the selection process, Schumer even suggested to White House chief of staff Ron Klain that Jackson would be the best option to get confirmed over the other names on Biden’s short list, according to a source familiar with the conversation.

“We called [Biden] early on and said, ‘We’ve got to get a nominee quickly, the longer we wait, the tougher it’s going to be,’” Schumer recalled in an interview.

The idea of a lightning quick confirmation didn’t sit well with everyone in the caucus. But “when you have 50 senators, you can’t delay. A lot of people wanted to delay until June, until [retiring Justice Stephen] Breyer was actually stepping down,” Schumer added.

That was never an option for Schumer. And as the majority leader and a longtime member of the Judiciary Committee, the New Yorker’s fingerprints are all over Jackson’s confirmation. For Schumer, confirming her to the Supreme Court was “at the very top of the list” of his achievements with Biden, a pinnacle of his decadeslong work to diversify the bench.

Unlike top Democratic legislative priorities, the support of Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) for Jackson was never really in doubt. Nonetheless, Schumer took a hands-off approach and directly told Manchin to vote his conscience. And Republican attacks only strengthened the Democratic resolve to approve Jackson.

Ultimately, the biggest question for Jackson wasn’t whether she’d be confirmed, but how many Republican votes she’d receive. On Monday, the White House finally got an answer: Three, a bigger bipartisan margin than the two most recent Supreme Court justices, despite the slimmest Senate majority in 20 years.

The White House pushed early for Republican support, with Biden personally calling several GOP senators, including Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Mitt Romney of Utah, all of whom voted to support Jackson. Jackson met with a total of 97 senators, according to a White House official.

Collins met with Jackson twice and spent hours on the phone with White House counsel Dana Remus before announcing her decision, about a week before the final vote. Collins’ support removed the possibility of a tied vote on the Senate floor.

Murkowski and Romney had their own timeline. In an interview, Murkowski recalled that she spoke to Biden “a couple times” before he announced his pick. And she talked to Jackson on the phone over the weekend. In the end, Murkowski decided to support her after going for an only-in-Alaska hike.

“I was home, where I can think and get clarity and clear-headed and not be swirled up with the politics of the matter,” the Alaska Republican said. “So I went out on a really good spring hike — where there was a warning that a bear had taken down a moose just off the trail — so ‘be alert.’ So you’re in a place where you can kind of just take all that in. So that’s how I do it.”

Romney also decided to vote for Jackson over the weekend, recalling that when the president spoke to him about the Supreme Court vacancy, Biden asked if the Utah Republican “had any perspective on the people that’d be considered.” Romney mentioned another potential nominee: Judge J. Michelle Childs, a South Carolina district court judge who Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) were publicly pushing.

“I told them I thought Judge Childs had the best prospects of being confirmed. But that I would take a deep dive and a careful look at whoever he nominated,” Romney said.

Graham supported Jackson for the lower court, but signaled early on he’d oppose her for the Supreme Court. While he lamented that the White House chose Jackson, many Democrats thought his public push for Childs backfired. Graham chalked up his public advocacy for Childs to Clyburn, who asked him directly if he could support her: “And I said ‘yeah, enthusiastically.’”

Republicans didn’t exactly make Jackson’s confirmation a cake walk for Democrats, even though she wouldn’t shift the 6-3 conservative balance of the court. In preparation for her confirmation, Chuck Grassley’s (R-Iowa) team requested transcripts from her time on the D.C. district court, which would form the basis of Republican questioning about her sentencing record, including on child pornography and drug cases, according to a GOP Senate aide.

Still, Durbin’s relationship with Grassley, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, maintained a relatively smooth process, other than haggling over GOP document requests. Democrats said most Republicans treated Jackson with respect, despite aggressive questioning from GOP Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Ted Cruz of Texas, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Graham.

Incredibly, the biggest impediment to her Thursday confirmation was up in the air — literally. On Monday, Durbin received a call around 7 a.m. from his chief of staff informing him that Sen. Alex Padilla’s (D-Calif.) plane was delayed, briefly postponing a key committee vote. Durbin immediately called Grassley with the news.

“I didn’t know what it meant. If he didn’t come in on Monday, it would have delayed the whole Senate a day,” Durbin said. ”I was on the phone, obviously with Chuck Schumer, but Chuck Grassley was my first call.” Ultimately, Padilla arrived around 4 p.m. and the process stayed on track, only delayed by a few hours.

For Schumer, Jackson is a culmination of his goal to see a more diverse high court. Even before former President Barack Obama had his first Supreme Court vacancy, Schumer recommended nominating Sonia Sotomayor, then a New York circuit court judge, to the high court.

“We’ve had a record, Biden and I,” Schumer said. “The people we’ve approved are people of color, and the majority are women.”

The Senate so far has confirmed 58 district and circuit court judges, outpacing other recent presidents on lower court nominees. More than 60 percent of those judges were people of color.

Jackson’s confirmation came at an opportune time for Biden and Schumer, as Democrats face political headwinds across the board. Biden’s poll numbers are near an all-time low, inflation remains high and Democrats are struggling to revive their domestic tax and spending bill. After months of headlines about internal fights, Jackson’s nomination unified the party, highlighting that confirming high-profile nominees can be an easier lift than legislating.

But Jackson’s Supreme Court proceedings also raise concerns about the future. In the end, Supreme Court nominees — from either party — may never break the old 60-vote threshold. After all, only one out of three of former President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court picks, Neil Gorsuch, received support from more than one senator from the minority party.

Not to mention the possibility that Republicans retake the Senate, giving a potential Majority Leader Mitch McConnell the ability to block another Democratic president from filling a Supreme Court vacancy. Schumer didn’t mince words on that prospect in 2023 or 2024: “I worry.”

Related articles

‘Coin-flip chance’ Trump does it to me: Ex-official fears he will become next Comey



Former Department of Homeland Security chief of staff Miles Taylor thinks he's probably next on the list of people to get the James Comey treatment from President Donald Trump.

Trump demanded that the Justice Department act on the former FBI director with a prosecution. On Wednesday, Comey was arraigned in court, and Taylor was in court to watch.

"I showed up because I agree or disagree with James Comey's decisions over the years, to me, this is so obviously a case of selective and vindictive prosecution, and sets an extraordinary precedent. Now, I'd be remiss if I didn't say I think that precedent probably affects my fate as well. I'm on the president's enemies list. I think that there's a coin flip chance he tries to put me in the same shoes as James Comey, charge me with something that's obscure," Taylor surmised.

He went on to assert Comey's rights are being violated — and that would apply to anyone in that situation.

"I think it was important for people to go up there, including former Trump officials like myself, to be there at the courthouse and to point out that this is, again, a vindictive prosecution," Taylor added.

Trump’s blunders ‘raise the risk of global conflict’ as enemies ‘gang up’: analyst



After a series of diplomatic blunders, President Donald Trump and America's reputation loss could "raise the risk of global conflict" and come at a major cost, including "mischief or worse" from enemies.

In an opinion piece published Monday, Bloomberg columnist Andreas Kluth describes how a good reputation can be difficult to obtain or maintain, and Trump "has squandered whatever credibility America had left in foreign and security policy."

Following his rambling speech last week in front of the United Nations and his struggle to see the difference between "personal chemistry" with President Vladimir Putin and diplomatic action, Trump has effectively put both adversaries and allies on edge, wrote Kluth.

"Inklings of danger are everywhere," Kluth writes. "America’s partners are becoming more anxious and making alternative arrangements for their security: Saudi Arabia just signed a defensive pact with Pakistan after watching an Israeli strike against its Gulf neighbor Qatar, which is allied to, but got no help from, the United States. America’s adversaries keep testing the resolve of Trump and the West, as Putin is doing in eastern Europe. Or, like Xi Jinping in Beijing and Kim in Pyongyang, they’re recalculating bellicose scenarios in secret. Other countries, like India, are wary of committing to America and keeping all options open, even clutching hands with Moscow and Beijing."

And although Trump is not the first president to struggle with navigating U.S. reputation among foreign nations, it puts America at an unfortunate future disadvantage.

"Against this backdrop, anybody watching US policy for the past decade, from friendly Europe to adversarial China, already had reason to doubt US credibility. What Trump has done in his second term is to remove the doubts and confirm the loss. Allies now know they can’t trust America, while adversaries are ganging up and recalculating their plans for mischief or worse.

It's unclear what will happen in the future; a damaged reputation jeopardizes diplomacy.

"These responses to America’s loss of credibility will raise the risk of global conflict," Kluth writes. "The danger will go up even more if the US, under this or a future president, panics and decides to overcompensate in reestablishing its reputation, with a demonstratively hawkish turn that could tip into war. If America and the whole world are becoming less safe, it’s because Donald Trump’s foreign policy is, literally, in-credible."

DNC briefs top Democrats on audit of 2024 White House loss

The Democratic National Committee is reading Democrats into its election takeaways, though an aide cautioned it does not represent the full report.