Attorney General James Joins Multistate Coalition to Support Common Sense Gun Safety Efforts

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to Decide Whether Governments
Can Prohibit Possession of Guns With Obliterated Serial Numbers

NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James joined a coalition of 23 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief supporting federal efforts to ban the possession of firearms whose serial numbers have been removed. The brief, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, urges the court to overturn a ruling from a federal judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia that a federal statute prohibiting possession of a gun whose serial number has been removed is unconstitutional. The brief, filed in United States v. Price, asserts that banning the possession of firearms with obliterated serial numbers is consistent with the laws of 42 States and the District of Columbia and is constitutional. 

“Serial numbers are common-sense tools to track dangerous weapons and help keep guns out of the hands of bad actors,” said Attorney General James. “Declaring this gun safety measure unconstitutional could have dangerous impacts on the vast majority of American states, including here in New York. I am proud to stand with my fellow attorneys general in this bipartisan effort to protect American lives. So long as I am Attorney General, my office will always push for gun safety measures and efforts to remove weapons of war from New York communities.”

The amicus brief argues that the court should reverse the decision below and uphold the constitutionality of a federal criminal statute banning the possession of firearms whose serial numbers have been removed. An overwhelming majority of jurisdictions in the United States prohibit removing serial numbers or possessing weapons whose serial numbers have been removed. As the coalition of attorneys general notes, serial numbers are vital to tracing the origin and owner of a firearm used in the commission of a crime, which is crucial information used by law enforcement officials. The coalition also argues that the Second Amendment does not protect the right to possess a gun with an obliterated serial number, as the removal of a serial number is a clear indicator that a gun has been illegally trafficked and is being used or possessed for unlawful means. 

Joining this bipartisan coalition of attorneys general in support of gun safety laws is part of Attorney General James’ ongoing efforts to protect New Yorkers from gun violence. Earlier this month, Attorney General James helped take down a dangerous ghost gun trafficking ring in coordination with the NY Drug Enforcement Task Force. Last month, Attorney General James cracked down on online ammunition sellers illegally shipping ammunition to New York. In June, Attorney General James sued 10 national gun distributors for illegally selling and bringing ghost gun parts into New York. In July 2020, Attorney General James ensured that 17 websites which manufacture and sell firearms or firearms components ceased selling nearly complete assault weapons into New York state. In February 2021, Attorney General James led a coalition of 21 attorneys general supporting states’ efforts to enforce laws against a company disseminating 3D-printed gun files on the internet. Additionally, through her successful gun buyback program, Attorney General James has been able to remove over 3,800 guns from New York communities since 2019.

Joining Attorney General James in filing today’s brief are the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands. 

Related articles

We Won a Webby People’s Voice Award

We’re honored to have won the 2026 Webby People’s...

‘Massive cover up’ fears raised as House panel splits on clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell



Ghislaine Maxwell's condition to testify under oath — but only under the condition of clemency — has split House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members over whether President Donald Trump should grant her that pardon, Rep. James Comer (R-KY) told Politico on Wednesday.

Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator, was deposed by the committee and invoked her Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer the group's questions. Trump is the only one with the power to pardon her, something he has not yet ruled out.

Comer told Politico that he did not favor a pardon for Maxwell, a former confidant to the late financier and convicted child sex offender. When asked whether striking a deal with Maxwell could provide useful testimony, Comer did not share who on the panel supported granting her clemency.

"A lot of people do," Comer said.

"My committee’s split on that," Comer said. "I don’t speak for my committee."

"I think it looks bad," he added. "Honestly, other than Epstein, the worst person in this whole investigation is Maxwell."

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) said that Democrats on the committee collectively oppose a pardon for Maxwell.

"That would be a huge step backwards, and, quite frankly, so disrespectful to the survivors," he said in an interview. "She is a known abuser. She is a known liar."

"If the DOJ or Oversight Republicans are out there trying to negotiate some sort of pardon that is... not only a huge slap in the face to this investigation, to anyone, to the American public," Garcia said. "It’s a part of a massive cover up."

Niagara Pride to Host 5th Annual WNY Pride 5K & Wellness Event

Sets $75,000 Goal for Mobile Pride Unit SANBORN, NY –...

Where the Bands Are: This Week in Live Music and Concert News

Have a cool concert or interesting event you know...