Survivors of ‘Revenge Porn’ Now Eligible for Victim Compensation

Today, on Safer Internet Day, Assemblymember Monica Wallace (D-Lancaster) announced that her legislation to expand victim compensation to cover survivors of unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image is in effect. Assemblymember Wallace sponsored legislation (A7489) to compensate victims of these offenses, commonly known as “revenge porn,” for costs incurred as a result of the crime, such as lost earnings, mental health counseling fees, and relocation expenses.

In 2019, Assemblymember Wallace helped pass legislation (A5981) criminalizing revenge porn and giving victims an opportunity to pursue civil actions against alleged offenders. That action came after a 2017 study found 12 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 had explicit images of them shared without their consent.

“Sharing intimate images without consent is a cruel, abusive crime that often has long-lasting effects on victims, including harmed mental health, coercion, isolation, and deteriorated relationships,” said Assemblymember Wallace. “It’s only right that we provide these individuals with the same compensation that we afford to survivors of other sexual and abusive crimes. These resources will help survivors heal and move on with their lives.” 

Victim compensation provides a safety net for crime victims and some family members to cover costs associated with being a victim of a serious crime. The assistance is available after all other sources of compensation, such as insurance or workers’ compensation, have been exhausted.

“Legislation like this truly reflects the needs of survivors,” said Mary Travers Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Family Justice Center. “It lessens the barriers in seeking justice and fosters healing. There is an immense amount of unfair shame and victim blaming associated with revenge porn and similar crimes. This sends a strong message to perpetrators that their criminal actions will not be tolerated, and an even stronger message to survivors that they matter.”

Assemblymember Wallace has a long record of passing legislation to empower victims of sexual and domestic crimes. In 2019, she passed a series of laws to support victims of domestic violence, including legislation to recognize identity theft, grand larceny and coercion as forms of domestic violence (A5608), and allow victims of domestic violence to receive damages for economic and non-economic losses from all defendants found liable in civil court (A5614). In this past session, she co-sponsored and championed legislation to authorize bail and pre-trial detention for domestic violence offenses.

Related articles

‘Chaos’ at Trump’s ‘mega master’ court renders judges and defendants ‘terrified’: Report



The Trump administration's newly launched "mega master" court system has quickly devolved into mass chaos that leaves defendants, guards, lawyers and judges "terrified," according to a new report.

"Attorneys and former judges say mega master hearings serve as the latest tool for the Trump administration to deport large numbers of people," the Chicago Sun-Times reported Friday. "This time by causing chaos and confusion in the courts."

Courtroom 11 at Chicago's immigration court barely seats 25 people — but one July morning saw 60 people, mostly unrepresented asylum seekers, crammed in wall-to-wall by 9:10 a.m., the Sun-Times reported.

This is a "mega master" calendar hearing, a new procedural format instituted by the Trump administration at the end of May that packs between 100 and 185 people into a single judge's morning docket — up from an average of just 30 before the change.

Chicago's courthouse at 55 E. Monroe has logged more of these mass hearings than any other immigration court in the country, according to immigration scholar Austin Kocher.

The scale has created conditions former immigration judges call dangerous.

On days when multiple mega hearings are scheduled simultaneously, hundreds of people — including families with strollers — spill into hallways narrower than an adult's arm span, waiting for hours to be called.

On one recent Thursday, roughly 200 people queued in the heat outside courtrooms designed to hold a fraction of that number.

"This is not good," one guard was overheard saying. Former judges have raised concerns that the overcrowded hallways amount to a fire hazard.

Attorneys and former judges argue the hearings serve to discourage immigrants from showing up at all, then fast-tracking deportations for those who don't.

In June, for the first time since 2019, more immigrants missed their Chicago court dates than attended — 58 percent of the 10,370 people summoned nationwide in June were marked absent, according to data from the nonprofit Mobile Pathways. Missing court can trigger an automatic in absentia deportation order.

Compounding the pressure, notice periods have collapsed. Median lead time for a Chicago hearing fell to just 34 days in June, down from 229 days in May.

The Justice Department, which oversees immigration courts, says the expanded scheduling is meant to clear long-standing backlogs.

But former judge Elizabeth Treacy, who resigned in June after presiding over three mega hearings with up to 150 people each, said the volume makes errors — and injustice — nearly inevitable.

She noted that indigenous asylum seekers with limited Spanish fluency are especially unlikely to speak up when they don't understand proceedings in a crowded, intimidating room.

“It’s not a coincidence, but another tactic to facilitate deportations,” said Stephanie Spiro, an attorney with the National immigration Justice Center.

“It’s much more efficient for the government to deport people without even having to read any briefs, without having to have a full hearing, without having to schedule hundreds of people, and actually listen to their claims, and afford them due process.”

That fear caused Carolina, an immigrant from Venezuela who just gave birth, to question whether she should show up for her hearing.

She and her husband eventually decided to risk deportation and bring their three children to court.

“I was terrified," she said.

‘More about botox than bombs’: GOP candidates have a Hegseth headache — Dems are delighted



Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's blunders and bluster are about to become a central argument against Republican lawmakers in the upcoming midterm election, according to a new report.

Democratic candidates and campaign strategists consider the controversial Donald Trump Cabinet member to be a target-rich subject when it comes to putting their GOP opponents back on their heels, Politico reported Thursday.

"The more Hegseth puts himself out there, the more he does the work for us," said Matt Corridoni, a Democratic strategist told Politico.

"Normally the Secretary of Defense is not such a politically focused position, but he has pushed it into hyper politics. So you're going to see candidates using him as a foil more and more."

Hegseth's television personality has made him instantly recognizable, and his record of controversy provides endless ammunition for Democrats in key districts, the report states.

"Campaign planners said they expect candidates to call out Hegseth even more as the war against Iran continues," the report stated. "Trump has repeatedly said the Defense secretary was among the first and most vocal proponents of the fight, which has now lasted more than five months and led to a spike in global energy prices."

Cait Conley, an Iraq war veteran running for New York's 17th Congressional District, has been particularly brutal, calling Hegseth unqualified and incompetent while quipping that he knows "more about botox than bombs."

Rebecca Bennett, a former Navy helicopter pilot running for New Jersey's 7th Congressional District, has made Hegseth's removal a centerpiece of her campaign. She's called for his resignation at every stop, framing him as a threat to military integrity.

"Pete Hegseth is a disgrace to the office that he holds, and the reason why I believe he is deeply dangerous is partially because of the polarization," Bennett said.

"We have an obligation to call those things out when we see it, and to make sure that we are standing up for our service members who do not have the ability to speak out about these things."

LIVE: Trump IN FULL COLLAPSE as WAR DESTROYS TERM!!!! 7/28/2026

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on breaking...