Perpetual Groove – 2023-04-25 (set 2) – Buffalo Iron Works, Buffalo, NY

A top national security adviser for President Donald Trump took to Fox News on Tuesday to float a baseless conspiracy theory that a reporter inadvertently invited into a Signal group chat where officials mulled over war plans may have used nefarious means to smear the president.

President Donald Trump defended Mike Waltz as a "very good man" earlier Tuesday and said he does not need to apologize for the incident. Trump acknowledged his top officials made a mistake by using Signal to discuss war plans but downplayed its significance and insisted the information shared was not classified. He also suggested that Waltz would likely avoid using such platforms in the future.

Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have faced a mountain of criticism for using the app, and the reporter said he was invited into the group by mistake by Waltz. Waltz said Tuesday night he takes "full responsibility" for organizing the group chat to discuss airstrikes on Houthi militants in Yemen.

"I take full responsibility. I built the — I built the group," Waltz told Fox News host Laura Ingraham. "My job is to make sure everything's coordinated."

ALSO READ: ‘I miss lynch mobs’: The secretary of retribution's followers are getting impatient

But Waltz also floated a baseless theory — that the Atlantic journalist in question, Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg, may have somehow gotten himself on the messaging chain in a scheme to denigrate Trump.

"The president expressed complete confidence in you today and his entire Cabinet," said Ingraham. "But how did a Trump-hating editor of The Atlantic end up on your Signal chat?"

"You know, Laura, I'm not a conspiracy theorist," Waltz began, before suggesting a conspiracy theory. "But of all the people out there, somehow this guy who has lied about the president, who has lied to Gold Star families, lied to their attorneys, and gone to Russia hoax, gone to just all kinds of lengths to lie and smear the president of the United States. And he's the one that somehow gets on someone's contact and then gets sucked into this group."

Goldberg has said he's met Waltz, but the Trump adviser denied the two have ever met, telling Ingraham: "No idea."

"Wouldn't know him if I bumped into him, if I saw him in a police lineup. I do now. I knew him by reputation about lying — for lying about the president over and over and over again. I can tell you for certain — certainly wasn't reaching out and talking to him at all. Why would I?"

Watch the clip below or at this link.

Two Texans in Congress defend CHIPS Act in the face of Trump’s criticism" was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

Two Texas Republicans in Congress are defending the CHIPS Act, saying it benefits national security and creates jobs, and downplaying President Donald Trump’s recent request to get rid of the law.

The CHIPS and Science Act, signed into law in 2022 by then-President Joe Biden, gives funding to companies to manufacture semiconductors in the United States. This includes billions to help build and improve Texas factories producing materials for microchips.

The CHIPS Act – formally the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors Act – was an effort by the federal government to encourage more semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. Semiconductors, which make up microchips, are found in nearly every electronic device including cars, cellphones and computers.

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Austin, and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, introduced the Chips for America Act, the bill that set up the programs funded by the CHIPS and Sciences Act, in 2020. The lawmakers are prominent Republican supporters of government programs that encourage semiconductor production.

The Chips for America Act was included in the fiscal year 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, which became law after Congress overrode a Trump veto for reasons unrelated to semiconductor production.

McCaul said the foundations for the CHIPS act go back to when members of Trump’s national security team – Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross – approached him in 2020, while he headed the House China Task Force. They asked for help to start manufacturing “national security assets” inside the country and to pull supply chains out of Taiwan, McCaul said.

In his second term, Trump shocked many lawmakers during his March 4 joint address to Congress by asking House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, to “get rid of” the act.

“Your CHIPS Act is a horrible, horrible thing,” Trump said. “We give hundreds of billions of dollars, and it doesn’t mean a thing.”

The president implied that tariffs on semiconductors would be enough to encourage companies to move production to the United States.

But McCaul told The Texas Tribune that he thinks the president “went off script and was not well informed,” during the joint address.

“I think there's a little bit of cleanup behind the scenes,” McCaul said.

Trump might think it was a Biden administration idea, McCaul said, because Biden signed the CHIPS and Sciences Act into law. McCaul said Trump’s comment against the act “defies the history of CHIPS, which goes back to his administration and his national security team.”

The joint address wasn’t the first time Trump criticized the act. In January, Trump called CHIPS a “ridiculous program.”

Trump’s Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, during his January Senate confirmation hearing, called the act an “excellent downpayment,” to begin to bring semiconductor manufacturing to the United States, but added that the administration needs to study the law to “make sure that you get the benefit of the bargain.” Lutnick did not fully commit to continuing to fund CHIPS after being asked to by Democrats.

McCaul and Cornyn penned an op-ed days into the second Trump administration that called for Republicans to “reclaim rightful credit,” for the act and remove some grant recipient criteria.

Cornyn, one of 17 Senate Republicans to vote for the CHIPS Act, told The Texas Tribune Tuesday that he does not think getting rid of the act is likely.

“If something were to happen to the supply chain for advanced semiconductors, which is largely based in Asia, we would be in a depression,” Sen. John Cornyn said. “It would very negatively affect our national security interests.”

While the United States used to produce a significant portion of the world’s semiconductors, in recent years Asia – specifically Taiwan – has become the center of production. Taiwan, as of 2023, produces over 60% of semiconductors worldwide.

Sen. Ted Cruz, who voted against the CHIPS Act, was a leader on a successful bipartisan bill last year to take away some requirements for applicants – such as environmental reviews and permits.

Asked for comment, Cruz’s team did not send a statement about his current stances on the CHIPS Act in time for publication.

McCaul said the manufacturing jobs the law created and the national security aspect “plays right in line with America First,” a goal of Trump’s policies.

Multiple Texas facilities have been awarded funding from the CHIPS Act. This includes up to $4.7 billion for Samsung to build new facilities in Taylor and to improve one in Austin. Three new facilities in Sherman – up to $900 million for two Texas Instruments facilities and as much as $380 million for a GlobalWafers facility – were also granted funding under the act.

Other planned Texas projects have a more uncertain fate. In December, the federal government signed a $50 million nonbinding preliminary memorandum to modernize a X-Fab facility in the state. On Jan. 16, the federal government signed similar agreements with IntelliEPI for over $10 million to improve a facility and with Sumika to construct a Baytown factory for around $52 million.

The federal CHIPS Act was replicated by the Texas state government in 2023, setting aside almost $700 million to subsidize companies that make microchips.

Disclosure: Texas Instruments has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

We can’t wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas’ breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.

Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.

TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/03/12/texas-congress-cornyn-mccaul-trump-chips-act/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.