Peru to send Dutch killer to face US charges over 2005 Holloway case

A Dutchman jailed in Peru for murder will be handed over to face charges in the United States related to the 2005 disappearance of an American woman in Aruba, authorities said Wednesday.

The ruling marks a turnaround from the South American country’s decision in 2012, when it said it would only send Dutch national Joran Van der Sloot to the United States in 2038 once he had completed a 28-year prison sentence for murdering a Peruvian woman.

Van der Sloot, now 35, is the prime suspect in the 2005 disappearance of 18-year-old US college student Natalee Holloway on the Caribbean island of Aruba.

Peru’s 2012 decision on his extradition followed a request from a federal court in the US state of Alabama.

The court indictment says Van der Sloot demanded $25,000 from Holloway’s parents in exchange for information on their daughter’s whereabouts. He fled to Peru once he received the money.

Peru’s Supreme Court on Wednesday authorized “the temporary surrender of Joran Van der Sloot for his prosecution in that country (the United States) for the alleged crimes of extortion and fraud”.

“Once the criminal proceedings against Van der Sloot are concluded, he will immediately be returned to the authorities of Peru,” it said.

Holloway’s disappearance received wide media coverage in the United States.

Van der Sloot pleaded guilty to murdering 21-year-old Stephany Flores in May 2010, after meeting her in a casino.

© Agence France-Presse

Related articles

John Oliver’s Charlie Kirk Rant Was Stunning In The Worst Possible Way

HBO host John Oliver's brief rant about slain activist Charlie Kirk in the midst of Trump’s attacks on free speech was stunning for all the wrong reasons.

The post John Oliver’s Charlie Kirk Rant Was Stunning In The Worst Possible Way first appeared on Mediaite.

‘Got his wish’: WSJ warns Trump he ‘owns’ the interest rate drop ‘for good or ill’



The Wall Street Journal's conservative editorial board issued a stark warning to President Donald Trump on Wednesday after the Federal Reserve voted to lower interest rates by 0.25%.

The vote happened after Trump applied months of public pressure on the central bank to lower interest rates. The president has moved to install multiple new governors who would vote to reduce rates, with the newest Trump-aligned governor, Stephen Miran, joining the board this week.

"President Trump wants lower interest rates, and on Wednesday, he got his wish as the Federal Open Market Committee cut the overnight rate by a quarter point," the editors argued in a new op-ed. "The FOMC also delivered an implicit warning about what this might mean for the economy. Mr. Trump now owns that, too."

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said on Wednesday that there are still some risks the U.S. economy needs to navigate. For instance, inflation and unemployment have trickled upwards. Powell said those factors have the central bank torn between two mandates: stabilizing prices and maximizing employment.

The Journal's editorial board also wished Trump "good luck" as his administration addresses these economic conditions.

"It may be that everything works out fine: inflation drifts downward after a brief price bump from tariffs, the economy booms despite tariffs and a looming labor shortage, the housing market enters a new golden age, and financial markets gallop happily off into the artificial-intelligence sunset," the editors wrote.

"But if Mr. Trump is wrong, voters will notice sustained inflation and the lack of gains in real wages. Having staked so much on his political assault on the Fed, Mr. Trump owns the outcome now for good or ill," they added.

Read the entire op-ed here.

5 Points on Trump’s High-Stakes Onslaught Against Fed Governor Lisa Cook

An appeals court ruled late Monday that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook could not be fired by President Donald Trump...