The do-nothing Congress

“Passing a tax bill that makes the president look good — mailing out checks before the election — which means he could be re-elected, and then we won’t extend the 2017 tax cuts.” Senator Chuck Grassley, (R), Iowa, concerning a bi-partisan bill, approved in the House of Representatives by a vote of 357 to 70, that would provide tax breaks for businesses and low-income families.

“A lot of people do call me, they respect [me] and say, ‘What do you think’?  If the bill is not going to be a great bill and really solve the problem, I wouldn’t do it at all.”  Donald Trump, speaking in reference to his efforts to kill  bi-partisan legislation which would implement reform in the management of immigration issues.

In the highly charged political atmosphere that permeates Washington these days, senators and members of the House from both sides of the aisle have been working hard to pass legislation that deals with some critical issues facing this country.  That is the definition of governing, which is what we send senators and representatives to do.  However, most Republican members of Congress are more interested in scoring political points that might get them on Fox News than in getting things done.  Legislating takes a back seat to performance art, playing to the base.

As to proposed tax bill, Republicans such as the 90-year-old Grassley are prepared to ignore the actual legislation.  According to NBC, the Republican-controlled House Ways and Means Committee stated last week that under the legislation, the Biden administration would be “explicitly prohibited” from “manipulating the bill’s tax relief in an attempt to send politically timed refund checks.”  The bill expands the child tax credit and reinstates business deductions that were rescinded during the Trump administration.

The immigration bill is another example of the Republicans putting politics ahead of governing. The bipartisan deal would sanction tougher border policies while providing another round of funding for Ukraine. Republicans seem to favor Vladimir Putin over the brave people of Ukraine who are fighting to retain their freedom. Aid to Israel also hangs in the balance. One of the leaders of congressional efforts to approve the immigration legislation is Senator James Lankford, a conservative Republican from Oklahoma. For his efforts he was condemned and censured by his state’s party, an action its chairman later said was illegitimate. The national Border Patrol union, which endorsed Trump in 2020, supports the Senate bill.

In 1947 President Harry Truman faced a Republican-controlled Congress which opposed many programs that he proposed. In an address to Congress he pleaded for bipartisan support for his plans. “On some domestic issues we may, and probably shall, disagree,” Truman said. “That in itself is not to be feared. It is inherent in our form of government. But there are ways of disagreeing; men who differ can still work together sincerely for the common good. We shall be risking the Nation’s safety and destroying our opportunities for progress if we do not settle any disagreements in this spirit, without thought of partisan advantage.”

In the 1948 election Truman took his case to the people, labeling the Republicans as the “Do Nothing Congress” for their efforts to put politics over governing.  In that election not only did Truman defeat Thomas Dewey, but Democrats gained back nine Senate seats and seventy-five seats in the House, taking control of both chambers.

The work of current Republican members of Congress to torpedo efforts dealing with key issues in this country is an echo of 1948.  The public will be the judge, but the public is not much interested in the performance art activities of senators and House members.  It makes for a rerun of the “Do Nothing Congress” label that Truman attached to Republicans many years ago.

The tone for all this nothingness in the current Congress was set in January 2023 with the fiasco involving the selection of a Speaker of the House of Representatives.  The show continued throughout the year and reared its ugly head again in the fall when Republicans ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy and then went through a speaker-rama series of actions, eventually settling on Mike Johnson.  Johnson now finds himself in the same predicament that befell McCarthy.  The year is still young.  We could see another speaker or two before 2025.

None of these developments are good for the country.  Only the voters next November can set things straight.

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Darien Lake NEEDS To Be Fixed

https://www.youtube.com/embed/CP27Jmis8XU

Sleazy Trump destroyed hope of national glory in a single phone call



First, full disclosure: I’m not a soccer fan. I'm a football fan, and a diehard Pittsburgh Steelers fan. So, having said that, let’s start with a hypothetical.

Say the Steelers are heading into a playoff game and their best defensive player just got suspended for a hit the league ruled illegal.

Team owner Art Rooney doesn't like the call. So he picks up the phone, calls NFL commissioner Roger Goodell directly, and leans on him to “take another look.” Two days later, the league reverses course. The suspension is lifted. The player suits up. The Steelers win.

If that happened, I'd be thrilled, and I would not be asking a single question about how it all went down. Because Art Rooney owns the Steelers. Roger Goodell runs Rooney's league. That's a phone call between people inside the same house, playing by rules (well, I would hope they are) that belong to them.

Nobody outside that room would have any right to be outraged, except, of course, if you were a Baltimore Ravens fan. But I digress.

Now here's a real story about how another phone call went down.

Last Thursday, U.S. striker Folarin Balogun picked up a red card during Team USA's win over Bosnia and Herzegovina. It was a foul serious enough to draw an automatic one-match ban, which would have kept him out of tonight’s knockout match against Belgium.

Balogun is the team's leading scorer at this World Cup. Losing him for a win-or-go-home game felt, to a lot of American fans, like a gut punch. Donald Trump decided to meddle. He called FIFA president Gianni Infantino and asked him to "review" the card. My bet? Trump didn’t say the word "review."

On Sunday, FIFA announced the suspension was being set aside, not overturned outright, mind you, but "suspended for a probationary period," a wobbly phrase that bounces off the head and goes out of bounds. It all screams corruption, which America, and the world now knows, is Donald Trump’s middle name.

In the Oval Office on Monday, Trump bragged about what he did. Balogun will start against Belgium tonight, and the world is seething with anger — or at least most of the world.

Now, here's the difference from my Steelers story: Donald Trump doesn't own Team USA. He isn't its coach, its federation president, or anyone with legitimate standing to intervene in a disciplinary process.

I highly doubt Trump is even a soccer fan because it’s not bloody and gory like a UFC match.

He's, gallingly, the President of the United States, and he’s calling the head of an independent global sports body four days before his own country's must-win game. It reeks of favoritism, stacking the deck, and dissing every other team in the tournament.

Let’s do another hypothetical.

What if Belgium's star goalkeeper, Thibaut Courtois, received a red card during the team’s win over Senegal, and Belgium’s Prime Minister, Bart De Wever, called Infantino and asked him to review Courtois’ red card? That request would stand a snowball's chance in hell.

The last time something like this happened, when a red card suspension was famously bypassed following presidential intervention, was during the 1962 World Cup, when Brazilian star winger Garrincha was cleared to play in the final after political pressure.

There is a reason the last time this happened was 64 years ago, and I don’t think I need to explain why.

Once the suspension was lifted, all hell broke loose.

This time, Belgium's football federation called the reversal "unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable." They appealed the decision, but guess what? They were denied. Go figure!

Former English soccer star and BBC analyst Wayne Rooney called it "an absolute disgrace." Another English former star and current NBC Sports analyst Gary Neville said it "absolutely stinks."

Once politics — or, in this case, the sleazy Trump — gets involved, who knows where or how it stops?

None of this should surprise anyone who's watched Infantino suck up to Trump. He slavishly and ridiculously handed Trump the tournament's first-ever "Peace Prize" last December and has spent months building political cover for him. Infantino runs a federation about to post record profits hosting the biggest live sports event on earth, and Trump is his money ticket because the games are happening here in the U.S.

If Infantino said no to Trump, would Trump sic FCC Chair Brendon Carr on him and threaten the cash cow of broadcasting rights? Maybe that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but who knows what the impulsive Trump would do?

It’s a wash, though, since Infantino would change Trump’s diaper if he were asked to.

What makes this so combustible is that it's split fans into three camps. So once again, Donald Trump sows unparalleled division.

American fans who just want their team to win are thrilled because Balogun is irreplaceable, and losing him felt like getting robbed.

Other American fans, the ones who think the undisciplined Trump has no business anywhere near a disciplinary ruling, are embarrassed, and plenty of them are openly rooting for Belgium tonight because Donald Trump inserted himself, again, into a situation where he does not belong.

And fans overseas, many already furious at what Trump's tariffs and uncalled-for Iran war have done to their economies, see this as one more example of the evil Trump being the loathsome Trump. They hate America and Americans because they voted for Trump.

Tonight, they're not just rooting against a soccer team. They're rooting against Trump and against a country they feel put him back in office.

We have now drifted so far away from whether the original red card was the right call. If the U.S. wins tonight, plenty of people around the world will say it wasn't earned, and that with Trump’s intervention, the U.S. cheated.

The U.S. will be the team the whole world roots against.

If the U.S. loses, just as many will call it karma. Either way, the team can't win without controversy. Trump made sure of that, then made it worse by bragging about it afterward, thanking FIFA for "reversing a great injustice."

Whatever the final score says tonight in Seattle, it won't tell the real story. The real story is that once again, everything Donald Trump touches ends up poisoned by Donald Trump, and a tournament that was supposed to belong to the world now has his dirty fingerprints all over it.

If anyone deserves a red card — a permanent one — it’s Donald Trump.

Trump IMPLODES at NATO Summit as Allies ABANDON HIM!!!

Ken Harbaugh breaks down Trump's chaotic performance...

New AI Tool Spots Hard-to-See MS Brain Lesions

An international team led by UB has developed a...