The do-nothing Congress

“Passing a tax bill that makes the president look good — mailing out checks before the election — which means he could be re-elected, and then we won’t extend the 2017 tax cuts.” Senator Chuck Grassley, (R), Iowa, concerning a bi-partisan bill, approved in the House of Representatives by a vote of 357 to 70, that would provide tax breaks for businesses and low-income families.

“A lot of people do call me, they respect [me] and say, ‘What do you think’?  If the bill is not going to be a great bill and really solve the problem, I wouldn’t do it at all.”  Donald Trump, speaking in reference to his efforts to kill  bi-partisan legislation which would implement reform in the management of immigration issues.

In the highly charged political atmosphere that permeates Washington these days, senators and members of the House from both sides of the aisle have been working hard to pass legislation that deals with some critical issues facing this country.  That is the definition of governing, which is what we send senators and representatives to do.  However, most Republican members of Congress are more interested in scoring political points that might get them on Fox News than in getting things done.  Legislating takes a back seat to performance art, playing to the base.

As to proposed tax bill, Republicans such as the 90-year-old Grassley are prepared to ignore the actual legislation.  According to NBC, the Republican-controlled House Ways and Means Committee stated last week that under the legislation, the Biden administration would be “explicitly prohibited” from “manipulating the bill’s tax relief in an attempt to send politically timed refund checks.”  The bill expands the child tax credit and reinstates business deductions that were rescinded during the Trump administration.

The immigration bill is another example of the Republicans putting politics ahead of governing. The bipartisan deal would sanction tougher border policies while providing another round of funding for Ukraine. Republicans seem to favor Vladimir Putin over the brave people of Ukraine who are fighting to retain their freedom. Aid to Israel also hangs in the balance. One of the leaders of congressional efforts to approve the immigration legislation is Senator James Lankford, a conservative Republican from Oklahoma. For his efforts he was condemned and censured by his state’s party, an action its chairman later said was illegitimate. The national Border Patrol union, which endorsed Trump in 2020, supports the Senate bill.

In 1947 President Harry Truman faced a Republican-controlled Congress which opposed many programs that he proposed. In an address to Congress he pleaded for bipartisan support for his plans. “On some domestic issues we may, and probably shall, disagree,” Truman said. “That in itself is not to be feared. It is inherent in our form of government. But there are ways of disagreeing; men who differ can still work together sincerely for the common good. We shall be risking the Nation’s safety and destroying our opportunities for progress if we do not settle any disagreements in this spirit, without thought of partisan advantage.”

In the 1948 election Truman took his case to the people, labeling the Republicans as the “Do Nothing Congress” for their efforts to put politics over governing.  In that election not only did Truman defeat Thomas Dewey, but Democrats gained back nine Senate seats and seventy-five seats in the House, taking control of both chambers.

The work of current Republican members of Congress to torpedo efforts dealing with key issues in this country is an echo of 1948.  The public will be the judge, but the public is not much interested in the performance art activities of senators and House members.  It makes for a rerun of the “Do Nothing Congress” label that Truman attached to Republicans many years ago.

The tone for all this nothingness in the current Congress was set in January 2023 with the fiasco involving the selection of a Speaker of the House of Representatives.  The show continued throughout the year and reared its ugly head again in the fall when Republicans ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy and then went through a speaker-rama series of actions, eventually settling on Mike Johnson.  Johnson now finds himself in the same predicament that befell McCarthy.  The year is still young.  We could see another speaker or two before 2025.

None of these developments are good for the country.  Only the voters next November can set things straight.

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

“ICE Is OK with Renee Good’s Killing”: Journalist Ken Klippenstein on ICE Tactics & Recruitment

Reporter Ken Klippenstein’s latest investigation into the inner workings...

🚨AG Bondi has MELTDOWN ON AIR as 3000 DOJ LAWYERS QUIT

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Attorney...

The Landmines Under the Water

For a few hours, we didn’t know why several top prosecutors, including the recent acting head of the office, Joe...

Latino voters powered Trump’s comeback. Now they’re turning on his economy.

Hispanic small business owners are souring on the Trump economy, a warning sign to Republicans ahead of this year’s midterms.

MAGA influencer who stirred ICE attacks reveals ‘grim’ future: columnist



An analyst Wednesday described how the ICE attacks in Minneapolis and deadly shooting of Renee Good were all prompted by a MAGA influencer "chasing clicks" — and showed the potentially grim future of MAGA journalism.

The Bulwark's Andrew Egger revealed how MAGA influencer Nick Shirley's "highly misleading gonzo video" led to the chaos in Minnesota. Shirley was confronting workers at Somali-run daycares and health care centers over claims of fraud in a now-viral video created unfounded allegations that spurred into a new campaign under the Trump administration to target the Somali community.

"Within days, the White House was surging immigration enforcement to Minneapolis; Vice President JD Vance said Shirley had 'done far more useful journalism than any of the winners of the 2024 [Pulitzer] prizes,'" Egger wrote.

"If this sort of person doing this sort of work can be so richly rewarded on the right right now, it’s safe to say both that Shirley will be a major fixture of the online right for a while, and that many others will try to follow in his footsteps," Egger added. "But if he’s the future of right-wing journalism, the future is very bleak indeed."

In the past, and in traditional media, Shirley would have had oversight or rules to abide by. But that's not the case now.

"Much of the old press model has collapsed entirely, especially on the right," Eggers wrote. "Guys like Nick Shirley aren’t trying to join a publication, they’re picking up a camera and trying to go viral on their own. They have no safety net, no sounding board, no mentorship, no way to grow beyond what they’re doing this minute. All they have is the zero-sum game of the algorithm: Get noticed or die. Of course they’re going to do what the algorithm demands—which, on today’s right, means snappy, confrontational, fact-agnostic propaganda for the regime. That’s what the ecosystem rewards, so we’re going to get more and more of it. If you think that’s grim today, wait till you see the future."