LEGISLATURE MINORITY CAUCUS JEOPARDIZING IMPORTANT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

GOP’s Inexplicable Inability to Support Bond They Previously Voted for Puts Major Road Projects at Risk of Delay or Cancellation 

ERIE COUNTY, NY— Erie County Executive Mark C. Poloncarz today issued the following statement calling on the Legislature’s GOP minority caucus to approve the county’s bond resolution, which they had previously supported, at their next legislative session. Without the resolution’s approval several large infrastructure projects will be delayed or outright cancelled.

Erie County Executive Mark C. Poloncarz said, “Last week, three GOP minority legislature members (Chris Greene, Frank Todaro, and Lindsey Lorigo) voted against a resolution authorizing the county to issue bonds for thirty important infrastructure projects. John Mills was not present. If just one member of the minority had voted yes the resolution would have passed because all the majority democratic members voted for it.

What makes their no votes shocking is Legislators Greene and Todaro, as well as Mills, voted for the bonding package as part of the 2024 budget process (Legislator Lorigo wasn’t seated until January 1).

Nothing changed from what they approved last year. No projects were added to increase the borrowing. The cost of the borrowing is the same as it was last year. Until the vote it appeared the resolution would pass with unanimous support.

There can be no other reason to reject the resolution other than to prevent the county from moving forward with needed projects, including important road and bridge projects. It’s nothing more than the same type of obstructionist action you see from the GOP on the national level and now in Cheektowaga where the GOP members also killed the town’s proposed bond resolution last week.

If the resolution is not approved at next Thursday’s legislative session it is doubtful important road projects for New Road in East Amherst, a project Legislator Greene supports, and Borden Road in Cheektowaga can begin this year because of key timing issues related to these big projects, such as fabricating storm sewer catch basins. If the resolution is not approved, other important projects will have to be cancelled because the county will not have the money to pay for them.

I call on all minority legislators to stop playing games with the important work we must do and vote yes, just like they did when they approved the projects last December. Our constituents deserve nothing less.”

Related articles

‘Chaos’ at Trump’s ‘mega master’ court renders judges and defendants ‘terrified’: Report



The Trump administration's newly launched "mega master" court system has quickly devolved into mass chaos that leaves defendants, guards, lawyers and judges "terrified," according to a new report.

"Attorneys and former judges say mega master hearings serve as the latest tool for the Trump administration to deport large numbers of people," the Chicago Sun-Times reported Friday. "This time by causing chaos and confusion in the courts."

Courtroom 11 at Chicago's immigration court barely seats 25 people — but one July morning saw 60 people, mostly unrepresented asylum seekers, crammed in wall-to-wall by 9:10 a.m., the Sun-Times reported.

This is a "mega master" calendar hearing, a new procedural format instituted by the Trump administration at the end of May that packs between 100 and 185 people into a single judge's morning docket — up from an average of just 30 before the change.

Chicago's courthouse at 55 E. Monroe has logged more of these mass hearings than any other immigration court in the country, according to immigration scholar Austin Kocher.

The scale has created conditions former immigration judges call dangerous.

On days when multiple mega hearings are scheduled simultaneously, hundreds of people — including families with strollers — spill into hallways narrower than an adult's arm span, waiting for hours to be called.

On one recent Thursday, roughly 200 people queued in the heat outside courtrooms designed to hold a fraction of that number.

"This is not good," one guard was overheard saying. Former judges have raised concerns that the overcrowded hallways amount to a fire hazard.

Attorneys and former judges argue the hearings serve to discourage immigrants from showing up at all, then fast-tracking deportations for those who don't.

In June, for the first time since 2019, more immigrants missed their Chicago court dates than attended — 58 percent of the 10,370 people summoned nationwide in June were marked absent, according to data from the nonprofit Mobile Pathways. Missing court can trigger an automatic in absentia deportation order.

Compounding the pressure, notice periods have collapsed. Median lead time for a Chicago hearing fell to just 34 days in June, down from 229 days in May.

The Justice Department, which oversees immigration courts, says the expanded scheduling is meant to clear long-standing backlogs.

But former judge Elizabeth Treacy, who resigned in June after presiding over three mega hearings with up to 150 people each, said the volume makes errors — and injustice — nearly inevitable.

She noted that indigenous asylum seekers with limited Spanish fluency are especially unlikely to speak up when they don't understand proceedings in a crowded, intimidating room.

“It’s not a coincidence, but another tactic to facilitate deportations,” said Stephanie Spiro, an attorney with the National immigration Justice Center.

“It’s much more efficient for the government to deport people without even having to read any briefs, without having to have a full hearing, without having to schedule hundreds of people, and actually listen to their claims, and afford them due process.”

That fear caused Carolina, an immigrant from Venezuela who just gave birth, to question whether she should show up for her hearing.

She and her husband eventually decided to risk deportation and bring their three children to court.

“I was terrified," she said.

El-Sayed comes under fire for ‘ogre on a pike’ leaked comment

The Michigan Senate candidate saw immediate backlash from within his own party amid a tense primary that has divided progressives and moderate Democrats.