The 2024 presidential primaries in New York – were they really necessary?

The day this post is published, April 2, 2024, is presidential primaries Election Day in New York State.  Perhaps you didn’t notice.  If so don’t feel bad, you have lots of company.

The Democratic Party has decided on Joe Biden.  The Republicans have settled on Donald Trump.  Both have secured enough delegates to be selected as their party’s nominee at the summer conventions.  There were no TV ads or mailers for the New York primaries, and if there was any door-to-door activity it would seem that it was all for naught.

Officially there are several candidates in these primaries.  Democrats can chose among Biden, Marianne Williamson, and Dean Phillips.  Republicans can vote for Trump, Chris Christie, Vivek Ramaswamy, or Nikki Haley.

The Erie County Board of Elections ran eight days of early voting for the presidential primaries.  There are at last count a total of 283, 881 Democrats and 157,612 Republicans registered to vote in the county.  The Board of Elections, after eight days of fully staffed voting in 38 locations, reported that 3,597 Democrats (1.3 percent of those eligible) participated in the early voting.  The number for Republicans was 1,620  (1 percent.)

Of course if you are reading this on April 2nd you still have until 9 p.m. today to go vote at your regular voting location; you might want to check on where that is, since there are some election district consolidations going on.

As you might imagine, my interest in politics would likely put me at the top of the list of regular voters.  It has been that way since I first got the right to vote in the 1970’s.  But despite that history I did not vote early this year and I don’t plan to do so today either.

This is not some protest action and I would guess it is also the same for many other voters.  I support Joe Biden’s re-election.  I just did not see any point to voting in this election.

Having seen multiple TV ads for Tim Kennedy’s congressional election, some voters who did vote early or will come out today might have mistakenly assumed that this was the day when we would elect a new member of Congress.  That will have to wait.  For those registered voters in NY26 the early voting (again) will run from April 20 through April 28, with the special election held on April 30.

If Nate McMurray or someone else chooses to challenge Kennedy in the Democratic primary for the full two-year term as our NY26 representative there will also be early voting for that election from June 15 through June 23, with the primary on June 25.

All of these voting opportunities (29 days over a nine-week period) are amazing.  With the leader of their party still railing against early voting, Republicans must be conflicted.  Democrats don’t have that problem, which will be particularly evident in November.

You might ask, why is this election being held – at great expense.  The Gothamist, a non-profit local newsroom operating in New York City, explains:

While [Andrew Yang in 2020] suspended his presidential campaign in February of that year, when officials announced they were canceling the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, he joined with delegate candidates pledged to U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont in a lawsuit demanding that the election be held — and they won.

So the state is required to run these meaningless primaries in 2024.  The Gothamist reports that New York City alone will spend $25 million conducting the elections.  A total of 55,879 Democrats and Republicans voted early in the city (1.6 percent of those eligible).

Republican Elections Commissioner Ralph Mohr told WBEN this morning that early voting in Erie County cost $850,000.

In my recollections about presidential primaries past in Erie County and the rest of the state, there were many years when the attention and involvement was much more intense.  In 1968 Joe Crangle’s Erie County Democratic Committee pulled votes for Bobby Kennedy, whose name was still on the ballot even though he had been assassinated two or three weeks prior.  There were seriously contested races involving Shirley Chisholm running against George McGovern in 1972, Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford in 1976, Ted Kennedy versus Jimmy Carter in 1980, Bill Clinton against a bunch of folks in 1992, and John Kerry challenged by Bill Bradley and others in 2004.

The candidates in those presidential primaries were more involved in debating real issues.  The contests were generally more civil than what occurs today.  There aren’t and can’t be civil elections as long as Donald Trump is still a candidate and is leading a political party.

One of the fun things about this blog is seeing that some readers go back in the history of Politics and Other Stuff (now in our tenth year) and look up posts from long ago that may still have some relevance today.  I recently noticed that some folks had dug out a post from late 2015, just as the 2016 presidential election was getting underway.

The post (entitled “May the Force be with you,”) discussed the results of a national poll about the election from a Star Wars point of view.  Here are some highlights from the poll:

  • Jedi Obi Wan Kenobi would defeat all current American presidential candidates
  • The Order of the Jedi was more popular than either the Republican or Democratic parties
  • Hillary Clinton would defeat Darth Vader by a two-to-one margin, 32 to 16 percent
  • Jedi Master Yoda would defeat Trump 42 to 24 percent

Ah, but it seems that such observations were from “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far, away…”

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

‘Massive cover up’ fears raised as House panel splits on clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell



Ghislaine Maxwell's condition to testify under oath — but only under the condition of clemency — has split House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members over whether President Donald Trump should grant her that pardon, Rep. James Comer (R-KY) told Politico on Wednesday.

Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator, was deposed by the committee and invoked her Fifth Amendment right to decline to answer the group's questions. Trump is the only one with the power to pardon her, something he has not yet ruled out.

Comer told Politico that he did not favor a pardon for Maxwell, a former confidant to the late financier and convicted child sex offender. When asked whether striking a deal with Maxwell could provide useful testimony, Comer did not share who on the panel supported granting her clemency.

"A lot of people do," Comer said.

"My committee’s split on that," Comer said. "I don’t speak for my committee."

"I think it looks bad," he added. "Honestly, other than Epstein, the worst person in this whole investigation is Maxwell."

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) said that Democrats on the committee collectively oppose a pardon for Maxwell.

"That would be a huge step backwards, and, quite frankly, so disrespectful to the survivors," he said in an interview. "She is a known abuser. She is a known liar."

"If the DOJ or Oversight Republicans are out there trying to negotiate some sort of pardon that is... not only a huge slap in the face to this investigation, to anyone, to the American public," Garcia said. "It’s a part of a massive cover up."

‘Wah, wah, wah:’ AOC scoffs at GOP whining over gerrymandering



WASHINGTON — Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, had strong words for Republicans complaining about the gerrymandering in Virginia that voters approved on Tuesday, with strong support from her party.

"Wah, wah, wah," Ocasio-Cortez told Raw Story on Wednesday, mimicking a whining baby and laughing in response to a question from reporter Matt Laslo. "Democrats have attempted and asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering, and for 10 years, Republicans have said, 'no.'"

Laslo was asking Ocasio-Cortez to respond to complaints from the GOP that it would be unconstitutional for Democrats to have a 10-1 congressional majority in Virginia, which the gerrymandering ballot measure would make possible. A Virginia circuit court judge blocked the vote-approved redistricting on Wednesday, however.

Still, Ocasio-Cortez saw no problem with Democrats supporting gerrymandering after years of opposing it when done on the Republican side. For AOC, the GOP "wanted to start this," and the Democrats are just fighting back.

"What they're mad at is they're accustomed to a Democrat Party that rolls over, doesn't fight and takes everything sitting down," Ocasio-Cortez said. "What they're mad at right now is that we are here in a new day."

She mentioned Republican gerrymandering in North Carolina and Texas, where Democrats lost seats. Trump's call for Texas Republicans to gerrymander arguably kicked off what's now seen as a redistricting arms race.

"We have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did," AOC continued. "Now the Republican Party doesn't like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people."

Ocasio-Cortez said she would "welcome" working with the Republicans to pass a ban on partisan gerrymandering.

"We have the bill right here to end this all today," she said, smiling. "But they don't want to because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape."