Muslim Public Affairs Council Response to UB Student Rally

As Pro-Palestinian rallies, protests, and demonstrations continue across the country, the students at The University at Buffalo and Buffalo State University held similar rallies in Western New York.


The Muslim Public Affairs Council of Western New York is deeply disturbed by the targeting of Pro-Palestinian demonstrators at the University of Buffalo North Campus on Wednesday (May 1, 2024).


The forced removal of the students by Police seems to be a clear violation of their First Amendment rights, especially since they were exercising their rights peacefully as evidenced by circulating videos and reports by the media.

The University issued a statement stating “The university recognizes and respects students’ right to protest. It is our expectation that protests occur lawfully in public spaces, and protestors will not disrupt or prevent the orderly conduct of classes, lectures, events, and meetings”.
From all indications, the students were doing exactly that:

They were rallying peacefully and ‘lawfully in public spaces’, They did not ‘disrupt or prevent the orderly conduct of classes’, They did not ‘disrupt or prevent the orderly conduct of lectures’, They did not ‘disrupt or prevent the orderly conduct of events’, They did not ‘disrupt or prevent the orderly conduct of meetings’.

By all accounts, they were within UB’s Picketing and Assembly Policies.
The students even dismantled and removed the tents without any argument after they were reportedly advised by staff from Student Life and UB Police that the tents violated UB and SUNY policy.

Despite the show of power and intimidation by the authorities, the media reported that the situation was completely peaceful till the Police started forcibly dragging and removing students from the public space.
The Police also watched Muslim participants as they were offering the evening prayers quietly at 8.20 PM. And, within perhaps 30 seconds, the Police stormed the protest site and pounced on everyone without giving students any opportunity to leave the premises or any chance for conversation and questions before arrests were made.

By its admission, in the statement issued on May 1, 2024, the authorities stated “UB Police were assisted Wednesday evening by the New York State Police, Erie County Sheriff’s Office, and Amherst Police, among other assisting agencies”. Those “other assisting agencies” included the Police force from Buffalo, Kenmore, and Tonawanda as well as 15 police vehicles that were parked as a show of force presumably to intimidate the peaceful demonstrators.

Why this heavy-handedness?
Was it a part of the pre-planned strategy from State University to prevent students from expressing their views?

Why was there such a large Police force when there were less than 100 peaceful individuals in the demonstration?

The University authorities owe to the students, the faculty, the staff, and the Community that supports it an answer to these and related questions.

We are waiting patiently.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1785829654445605114
Muslim Public Affairs Council Response to UB Student Rally 1

Related articles

From Sonic Booms to Mystery Drones: How Science-Based Panics Take Hold

In Rough Edges, Mike Rothschild writes about fringe groups, conspiracy theories and how the Internet broke our brains. This column is part...

House GOP defectors advance labor petition — hours after leaders begged them to stop



In yet another blow to House Republican leadership, nine GOP lawmakers broke ranks to advance debate on a discharge petition for a labor rights resolution.

The proposal, noted independent congressional reporter Jamie Dupree on X, "sets strict timelines for businesses and newly-certified labor unions working on a first contract."

It's the latest in a long line of discharge petitions either taken up for debate or adopted outright in this term of Congress, driven by razor-thin margins dividing Republicans and Democrats and a set of GOP leaders who have frequently failed to enforce party unity. Other discharge petitions include one that forced the release of the Jeffrey Epstein child trafficking case files, and another that called for a three-year extension of enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies.

All of this came just hours after House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) publicly pleaded with his caucus to stop bypassing them and signing onto discharge petitions.

"I don't support that process," said Scalise to reporters. "I mean, look, we have committees and the committees do hard work and you know, everybody's got their own bills that they might want to move and you know, as the majority leader, when people come to me and they want a bill moved, I tell them first thing I always tell them is go talk to the chairman, work through the committee process. That is what the the regular order is around here."

Despite the rapid proliferation of discharge petitions, GOP leaders insist they are still in command of the caucus, with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) insisting to reporters at the end of last year that "I have not lost control."

Unfounded claim Melania Trump was an escort before meeting her husband recirculates online

Melania Trump has repeatedly denied the rumor since it first appeared in 2016, even winning a lawsuit against the Daily Mail.

Headlines for June 9, 2026

Trump Again Claims He's Nearing a Deal with Iran,...