Performance art politics at the local level

The House of Representatives is established in the United States Constitution as part of the governing apparatus of this country.  It is expected to pass laws and approve budgets.  The structure of government created by the Constitution was produced by compromise among the founding fathers.  It has more or less functioned with compromise for most of the country’s 235 years.

You may have noticed the antics of such politicians as Margorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, Matt Gaetz and others.  They have starred in the Republican chaos that has engulfed the House for the past 16 months.

Such chaos is pretty much not seen on the local level.  As an old saying goes, “there is no Democratic or Republican way of cleaning the streets.”  Most governments on the local and county level follow that dictum and just get the job done, often working some good bi-partisan compromises into the mix.

There are, however, a couple of local exceptions to that way of operating in the towns of Cheektowaga and Hamburg.

Cheektowaga last November elected Councilmember Brian Nowak as Supervisor.  He defeated his fellow Councilmember Michael Jasinski by 53 votes.  Nowak’s move to the Supervisor’s office left a vacancy on the Council and left the body divided with three Democrats and three Republicans.

Jasinski did not take his defeat well. He complained, in a Facebook quote included in a Buffalo News story that “Brian Nowak has cheated.”  He furnished no evidence but nonetheless accused Nowak of breaking “several election laws.”  He has carried his disagreements into 2024, where together with his two fellow Republican Councilmembers he has worked to gum up the operations of town government.

While Jasinski has tied up a variety of town issues the one that is most significant for town residents at the moment is the issuance of $11 million in bonds for work including:

  • $5.5 million for replacement of a deteriorated corrugated metal storm system installed in 1957
  • A full-depth reconstruction of two town-owned streets
  • $3.95 million for sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation at the Genesee Street pump station
  • $2.25 million for road repairs

Jasinski recently told the Buffalo News “[t]he issue I have with bonding is that it basically equates into raising taxes.”  He would support just the sewer work because the roads “really aren’t that bad.”

Jasinski and the other Town Board Republicans have repeatedly voted against the $11 million bond plan and say they will come up with their own plans for infrastructure improvements.  They claim that the town should decide on a smaller project list which they would pay for with town reserves.  But then, as Geoff Kelly for Investigative Post reports, Jasinski actually voted against his own resolution “which would have directed the town’s highway department to use $500,000 in reserve funds to pay for road repairs.”

Supervisor Nowak informs me that “the highway fund has unrestricted fund balance of approximately $6 million as of the beginning of March 2024. The Sanitary Drainage fund has roughly $4.2 million in sanitary sewer reserves as of the beginning of March 2024…  Towns and municipalities have used ARP [federal] funds to cover recurring budget expenses. Expenses grew as tax levies did not. Now we see villages, towns, and cities having to address the end of ARP funds as their expenses grew and tax levies did not. Because of this, the Town of Cheektowaga has to be very careful in regard to its cash flow and cash reserves. Our expenses grew faster than our tax levies, especially in the 2023 and 2024 budgets prepared by the previous Cheektowaga Supervisor. I have an obligation to maintain a reasonable amount of savings as part of multi-year budget planning. We need to be prepared for emergencies and unexpected cost increases.”

Meanwhile in Hamburg the recent flip of Town Board control to Republican/Conservative members has the new majority challenging the infrastructure plans of Democratic Supervisor Randall Hoak which were supported by the previously Democratic-controlled Council.  Newly elected Councilmember Frank Bogulski has been opposing a $9 million bond issue that would fund renovations of the town’s ice rink and community center.  Instead Bogulski proposes a brand-new combined ice rink and community center financed not by town bonds but by some sort of unidentified public-private arrangement.

Justin Sondel in recent Hamburg Sun editions reported on the issue.  He notes that the type of plan that Bogulski is suggesting has been reviewed previously on more than one occasion.  Sondel points out that similar developments in other towns and on Seneca Nation property have cost more than double what the proposed renovations and updates to existing facilities in Hamburg would cost.  Bogulski has not identified potential private partners who could help fund his suggestion.  He is looking for a plan that basically will cost the taxpayers nothing.  Sondel quotes Bogulski’s comments at a town Board meeting:  “We don’t have to raise taxes.  We can generate other sources of revenue.”

In the meantime, while the Hamburg Board await the alternative, the opportunity to proceed in an expeditious manner is slipping away.  Without needed renovations the ice rink could become non-functional if mechanical breakdowns occur.  Pre-scheduled events at the facility could be left holding the bag.

Perhaps when all is said and done the two sides in the two towns will come together with compromises that will move things along.  Or not.

The fiction about some magical funding arrangements that do not raise taxes but instead drain reserves and look for elusive “other sources of funds” may leave the roads and sewers in Cheektowaga and the ice rink and community center in Hamburg undone for 2024 with larger costs for the work hanging out into the future.

Playing to the crowd may seem like the way to go for some politicians.  It does not, however, serve local residents when critical public works are on the table.  Playing games with needed projects reminds me of an old car repair commercial: “the choice is yours; you can pay me now or you can pay me later.”

Political performance art on the local level does not get the extensive media coverage that the national characters get for such antics.  The end results, however, are the same: the public interest is not served.

In memoriam

Tom Gleed, who worked in Democratic politics for many years as a member of Mayor Tony Masiello’s staff and then at the Board of Elections, passed away last week.  Tom worked with many public organizations in Western New York and was an LGBTQ+ activist.  He was a well-liked and respected member of the community.  Rest in peace, Tom.

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Some Glimmers of Hope in the GOP’s Bleak Bid to Disenfranchise Black and Dem Voters

Hello, and welcome back to The Franchise! Yes, the redistricting battle rages on across the South, but, FINALLY, some positive...

James Talarico – Fact-checking James Talarico’s attack on Texas AG Ken Paxton about sex abuse plea deal

“Adam Hoffman abused a little boy” and Ken Paxton “let Hoffman off the hook.”

A Timeline of RFK Jr.’s Mixed Messaging on the Measles Vaccine

In defending his record on measles, Health and Human...

Hegseth axed women and minorities from Navy promotions —and tried to slip in his own aide



Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blocked the promotions of at least seven Navy officers hand-picked by a board of senior admirals, removing all women and most minority candidates from the list of nominees for promotions.

The intervention left a slate of 22 one-star admiral nominees that includes no women, despite females making up roughly 21 percent of the active-duty Navy, and only two nonwhite officers, despite racial minorities accounting for approximately 38 percent of the force, reported the New York Times.

At least two of the removed officers are women, two are Black men, and three are white men.

Four current and former defense officials, speaking anonymously to discuss sensitive personnel matters, said Hegseth's actions are highly unusual and appear to breach Pentagon rules, which permit the defense secretary to remove officers from promotion lists only when new information raises specific questions about their fitness to serve — not on ideological grounds.

Internal records suggest some officers were targeted because their names appeared on a website devoted to identifying "woke" military personnel, with infractions as minor as having served as a diversity liaison officer two decades ago. One highly regarded officer — a nuclear-trained surface warfare officer and former aide to a four-star admiral — was pulled from the list shortly after her name surfaced on the site for that decades-old role.

Hegseth also pushed senior Navy officials to place Capt. William Francis Jr., a Navy SEAL who serves as Hegseth’s special assistant, on the one-star list, but his lack of command experience made him ineligible for promotion and he was not selected, according to current and former Navy officials.

Since taking office, Hegseth has fired or sidelined nearly three dozen senior officers. Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI), the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, noted in recent Senate testimony that nearly 60 percent of the senior officers Hegseth has dismissed are female or Black — a group that currently makes up fewer than 20 percent of all generals and admirals.

Among those previously pushed out were General Charles Q. Brown Jr., the second African American to chair the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman ever to lead the Navy.

Hegseth has repeatedly declined to explain individual dismissals or removals, telling lawmakers he does not discuss such matters "out of respect for those officers" while speaking broadly of correcting years of what he called "gender and demographic engineering."

The Pentagon denied that race or gender played any role in promotion decisions, and the Navy declined to comment.

Trump jumps into Republican primaries for governor in South Carolina, Iowa and Oklahoma

Contests in those states have pitted allies against each other in a fierce competition for the president's endorsement.