Did Hunter Biden lose his 5th amendment rights with pardon?

(NewsNation) —Hunter Biden’s pardon by Joe Biden has sparked questions on whether the president’s son can assert his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination if ever forced to testify against his father in future investigations.

Many who want to see Biden investigated believe since Hunter can’t be charged federally with any crime committed between 2014 and 2024 under Biden’s pardon, he is now fair game in criminal investigations of other Biden family members. 

“Does this mean Hunter Biden just lost his 5th amendment right to refuse to testify on actions from 2014-2024? Asking for a friend,” far-right conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec wrote on X


Cyber Monday 2024 Deals

Best Cyber Monday deals for holiday shoppers

Top holiday discounts under $100

Apple products marked down for Cyber Monday sales

BestReviews is reader-supported and may earn an affiliate commission.


In his clemency announcement, the president called his son’s treatment a “miscarriage of justice” and pointed to political motivation behind federal felony gun and tax convictions of his son. 

The president’s sweeping pardon covers not just the gun and tax offenses against the younger Biden, but also any other “offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through December 1, 2024.”

Hunter Biden filed a court declaration accepting the pardon just hours after the president’s announcement.

Does Hunter Biden still have Fifth Amendment rights? 

Hunter Biden still has his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination when it comes to any state charges or potential future charges that don’t fall under the purview of Joe Biden’s pardon, trial attorney John Fishwick told NewsNation. 

However, since he is essentially immune from any charges during a ten-year period, he no longer needs to assert his Fifth Amendment rights and that opens the door for him to be called upon in investigations of others including his father, he said. 

So he doesn’t “lose” his rights, they just no longer apply, Fishwick said calling the situation “uncharted territory.” 

The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, which is the act of providing information that could be used against them in a criminal case. 

Under a pardon, an individual can no longer be criminally prosecuted for anything covered under it.  

Could Hunter Biden be compelled to testify against Joe Biden? 

Hunter Biden can be compelled to testify against his father because he is no longer at risk of criminal prosecution under federal law, Fishwick said. 

“The pardon that his father gave him is incredibly broad, which would cover everything so there’s a strong argument that he could be compelled to testify because he cannot incriminate himself,” he said. 

If Congress or the Department of Justice conducts any internal investigation of Joe Biden, his son can be called to testify and he will have to, he said. 

However, his legal team will fight vigorously against him having to testify and could say he isn’t compelled to testify because of potential future charges or because he needs to assert his Fifth Amendment rights under state charges that could still come about from him testifying, he said. 

“His lawyers are going to look for creative ways to prevent him from testifying, and that would be a good way to try to stop it,” he said. “Whether that wins or not remains to be seen, but they will be all in to prevent him from testifying.” 

Related articles

Trump PANICS as he FEARS HIS Life THREATENED by IRAN?!!

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Ted Cruz snaps as Dem invokes  famous 2013 clash: ‘You’re not Dianne Feinstein’



Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) interrupted Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) at a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing Tuesday to tell the Texas Republican she felt "personally aggrieved" by his lecturing — only to have Cruz fire back by invoking the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein, snapping, "You're not Dianne Feinstein."

The blowup came after Cruz delivered a lengthy monologue at a hearing on the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais ruling — a 6-3 decision gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act — accusing Democrats of believing Black candidates can only win in gerrymandered districts.

"The Democrats are fond of telling this story that is, and I wish I could find a kinder way to say it, a flat-out lie," Cruz said, rattling off Black Republican lawmakers elected in majority-white districts: Sen. Tim Scott, Reps. Burgess Owens, Byron Donalds, John James, and Wesley Hunt.

"In the Democrats' world, you're not Black if you're not a liberal Democrat," Cruz declared. "There is an arrogance to African American voters."

The Texas Republican then accused Democrats of being the real gerrymandering offenders, demanding to know how many Republicans represent New England in the U.S. House.

"Zero. Zero," Cruz said. "They've drawn every district in a naked gerrymander, and yet they're very upset that their illegal pursuit of power has now been stopped by the Supreme Court."

That's when Hirono cut in.

"Point of personal privilege," she said. "I feel personally aggrieved to sit here and to be lectured by my colleague from Texas."

Hirono then reached back more than a decade to invoke a now-famous clash between Cruz and Feinstein, who memorably told a freshman Cruz during a 2013 hearing on gun safety that she was "not a sixth grader."

"This reminds me of the time when he was first elected to the Senate, and the Judiciary Committee had a hearing on gun safety, and he felt a need to lecture Dianne Feinstein," Hirono said. "And she said to him, something along the lines of, 'I did not sit here on this committee for however many years she did, only to be lectured by you.'"

"And that is how I feel," Hirono continued. "So why don't you just stop lecturing the rest of us? Just because you think you are the smartest person in the world doesn't mean the rest of us agree with that."

Cruz didn't let it go.

"I knew Dianne Feinstein. I served with Dianne Feinstein," he shot back. "And you're not Dianne Feinstein."

This moderate Republican senator is already eyeing the exits 16 months into his term

Sen. John Curtis is looking at returning home to run for governor.

Trump’s former personal attorney Todd Blanche ERUPTS during hearing

Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! MeidasTouch relies on SnapStream...