Where the votes will be in the Democratic mayoral primary

The primary elections are down to the last two weeks.  Early voting starts on Saturday, June 14.  For the candidates and their teams it’s all hands-on deck for the final push.

TV ads, mailers, door-to-door canvassing, and phoning will be non-stop.  At this stage the candidates will be hunting for votes where they see their best opportunities.  Those opportunities need to be targeted.

My first experiences in campaigns a long time ago was in helping to identify the targets.  The manager of those campaigns, a successful businessman, dubbed the efforts “a marketing approach to politics.”  That meant reviewing voter registration and past election results on an election district basis to zone in on the best prospects.  The process was very rudimentary – there was no internet to extract data.  It meant pouring over oversized canvass books from previous elections.

The process is a lot more sophisticated these days and the best campaigns have used resources to pinpoint not just which election districts but even which voters within those districts offer the best prospects.

In the Democratic primary for mayor of Buffalo there is a lot of good information to assess from the five most recent primaries for the office.  That activity is needed to carry the day in a race which has two heavy hitters among a field of five candidates.

There are nine Council districts in the City of Buffalo.  Over the past five mayoral primaries some of those districts have been leaders of the pack in terms of voter turnout.  There are a handful of districts that will likely decide this election.

Here is a summary of the total turnout of Buffalo Democrats in those primaries:

  • 2005 – 30,308 votes
  • 2009 – 41,671
  • 2013 – 23,018
  • 2017 – 27,321
  • 2021 – 23,439

The average was 29,151, which is about 30 percent of the party’s total enrollment that currently stands at approximately 97,000.

In those primaries there is only one council district that has been in the top three in voter turnout all five times – the Delaware District.  Byron Brown carried the district in two of the primaries.  The largest number of votes cast in the district was in 2009, when nearly 6,000 votes were counted.

The Ellicott and Masten districts have been in the top three of districts four out of five times.  Collectively, over the five elections, Mayor Brown received 39 percent of his total votes from just those two districts.

In the South District  turnout has been best in the years when, as is the case this year, one of the candidates lived in the district.  Mickey Kearns received 4,321 votes in 2009.  Mark Schroeder collected 3,193 votes in 2017.

In all five primaries none of the other five Council districts (Fillmore, Lovejoy, Niagara, North, and University) finished in the top three in votes cast.  The Niagara and North performed the worst in turnout in three of the five elections.  Fillmore and Lovejoy were not much better.  The University District’s turnouts have been middling.

All of the candidates and their campaign teams will tell you that they are going after votes in very corner of the city, and of course that is true.  But you have to hunt where the hunting is best and that leaves the candidates with some obvious targets.

Acting Mayor Scanlon will get the largest share of his votes from the South District, the area he represented for 12 years on the Council.

Senator Sean Ryan will do his best in the Delaware District, which has been a key part of his electoral base.  His Senate District includes portions of six Council districts.

Among the three other candidates only Rasheed Wyatt has held elective office, serving for eleven years as the Councilmember for the University district.  He should do his best in that district.

Garnell Whitfield and Anthony Tyson-Thompson have never held elective office so they do not have a natural base of support.

All five candidates will work to take a large percentage of votes from Ellicott and Masten.  Success there might provide the margin of victory for the winning candidate.

So where does this all leave the election prospects of the five candidates.  Total turnout will likely be in the range of 30,000 – the average of previous elections.  Dividing up the vote five ways may mean that the winning candidate will need 12,000 to 15,000 votes.  Brown averaged 16,674 in his five campaigns but the field of candidates in those races was just two or three.

A solid base of support, buttressed by the financial resources available to get their messages across to the largest number of potential voters, moves both Scanlon and Ryan to the forefront of the election.  Both will need more than their bases, no matter how strong the base is, to win. 

Voting begins in four days.

There will, of course, be a contested election for mayor in November that could also include five candidates.  India Walton won the Democratic primary in 2021 by a small margin, but she was swamped by Byron Brown’s write-in campaign in November.  Anything is still possible. 

Early voting

Early voting will be available starting on Saturday, June 14th, and running every day through June 22.  The primary is on June 24th.  Here is a link to the Erie County Board of Election information about hours of operation and locations for early voting:  EARLYVOTING 2022 AUG.pub

Bluesky  @kenkruly

Twitter/X  @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Trump SUFFERS all ALONE as HIS LIFE COLLAPSES

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Trump Supreme Court battle could be dismantled by Congress members’ own history



New evidence is emerging that could deal a major blow to President Donald Trump's case for stripping birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants.

The president has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to restore “the original meaning” of the 14th Amendment, which his lawyers argued in a brief meant that “children of temporary visitors and illegal aliens are not U.S. citizens by birth," but new research raises questions about what lawmakers intended the amendment to do, reported the New York Times.

"One important tool has been overlooked in determining the meaning of this amendment: the actions that were taken — and not taken — to challenge the qualifications of members of Congress, who must be citizens, around the time the amendment was ratified," wrote Times correspondent Adam Liptak.

A new study will be published next month in The Georgetown Law Journal Online examining the backgrounds of the 584 members who served in Congress from 1865 to 1871. That research found more than a dozen of them might not have been citizens under Trump’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, but no one challenged their qualifications.

"That is, said Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia and an author of the study, the constitutional equivalent of the dog that did not bark, which provided a crucial clue in a Sherlock Holmes story," Liptak wrote.

The 14th Amendment states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside," while the Constitution requires members of the House of Representatives to have been citizens for at least seven years, and senators for at least nine.

“If there had been an original understanding that tracked the Trump administration’s executive order,” Frost told Liptak, “at least some of these people would have been challenged.”

Only one of the nine challenges filed against a senator's qualifications in the period around the 14th Amendment's ratification involved the citizenship issue related to Trump's interpretation of birthright citizenship, and that case doesn't support his position.

"Several Democratic senators claimed in 1870 that their new colleague from Mississippi, Hiram Rhodes Revels, the first Black man to serve in Congress, had not been a citizen for the required nine years," Liptak wrote. "They reasoned that the 14th Amendment had overturned Dred Scott, the 1857 Supreme Court decision that denied citizenship to the descendants of enslaved African Americans, just two years earlier and that therefore he would not be eligible for another seven."

"That argument failed," the correspondent added. "No one thought to challenge any other members on the ground that they were born to parents who were not citizens and who had not, under the law in place at the time, filed a declaration of intent to be naturalized."

"The consensus on the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause has long been that everyone born in the United States automatically becomes a citizen with exceptions for those not subject to its jurisdiction, like diplomats and enemy troops," Liptak added.

Frost's research found there were many members of Congress around the time of the ratification of the 14th Amendment who wouldn't have met Trump's definition of a citizen, and she said that fact undercuts the president's arguments.

“If the executive order reflected the original public meaning, which is what the originalists say is relevant,” Frost said, “then somebody — a member of Congress, the opposing party, the losing candidate, a member of the public who had just listened to the ratification debates on the 14th Amendment, somebody — would have raised this.”

Governor Hochul Announces Landmark Agreement to Support Advanced Nuclear Technology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABv3VCX6tlU Governor Kathy Hochul and Ontario Premier Doug...

Trump SHUTS DOWN CBS over STORY HE FEARED

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...