Money and politics – the Church and the campaigns

The name of this blog is Politics and Other Stuff.  Posts are usually on one subject or the other, but today’s post merges the two.  Politics and money impact both candidate politics and Church politics. 

First, the Church.

The Buffalo Catholic Church has been struggling for many years with the damage that sexual abuse and harassment by some members of the clergy has had on the Diocese.  Things are at the stage where some potential settlements with the victims of the abuse and harassment are being laid on the table.

Previous discussions about the total magnitude of the settlements were in the range of $100 million.  More recently the number has been bumped up to $150 million.  Is that the top line number or could it go even higher?

Last year the Diocese worked its way through what it calls the “Road to Renewal.”  The Road had/has more potholes than a normal Buffalo winter.  The general focus of the Road was on shrinking the number of functioning parishes.  The reasons offered for those plans were a substantially reduced number of attendees at Mass; fewer priests; and declining parish finances.

The downsizing of the Diocese has been a painful process that has often pitted parishes against one another.  Complicating the issues are the Diocese’s plans to reorganize the already reduced presence of Catholic schools.

As the size of a potential settlement package grows leadership has decided to go after all available sources of cash including Catholic Charities, the Diocese’s affiliated Cemetery Association, and most of all from the remaining parishes which are being required to fund more than half of the costs.

This past week the leadership of the Diocese held a series of parish meetings to let priests/administrators and councils know how much they must pay.  Payments in the range of 10 to 80 percent of the parishes’ unrestricted savings are required.    The richest parishes are expected to contribute a higher portion of their savings.  (Not to change the subject, but there are parallels here with how Trump’s tariffs have been calculated.)  Payments are due by July 15.

One parishioner at St. Benedict’s in Eggertsville, Nandor Forgach, told WBEN’s Susan Rose that the parish’s assessment was about $1.98 million.  Other parishes in the vicinity are being charged amounts approaching $1 million.

Mr. Forgach suggested that this all ties into the Diocese’s plans to merge parishes.  He told Rose “It’s clear.  This is politics at play.  If this doesn’t show it, I don’t know what else does.”

Many parishioners are not planning to comply with the Diocese’s financial assessments without a fight.  Many of them have already appealed the churches’ closings and mergers to the Vatican.

Where all of this all ends up is anyone’s guess but it is certain that the process will continue to be divisive and messy.  What would Jesus do?

The Greek Orthodox Church

There is only one Greek Orthodox Church in Western New York, the Church of the Annunciation located on Delaware Avenue in Buffalo; the parish has a second location in Lancaster.  Recently the Church had its own financial problems, albeit involving a considerably lesser amount than the Catholics are dealing with.

The Church fired Rev. Dr. Christos Christakis after he admitted to misusing $365,000 in Church funds for personal expenses.  WGRZ-TV’s reporting on the subject indicated that the amount in question was the same amount that Christakis himself admitted to.  There is no reporting on whether there was a forensic audit of the amount in question or whether the Church has done annual audits of its finances that might have uncovered the missing money sooner.  Church leadership, according to Channel 2’s reporting,  appears to not be interested in having the Buffalo Police Department or the District Attorney pursue criminal charges.

Campaign financial reporting

The final campaign financial reports for candidates running in the June 24th primary elections were due at the state Board of Elections on June 13th covering transactions from May 20th through June 9th.  Any contributions of $1,000 or more that are received after June 9th need to be reported to the Board of Elections within 24 hours of receipt of the money.

Here is a summary of the reports for the candidates in the Democratic primary for mayor of Buffalo and the Republican primary for supervisor in the Town of Amherst for that three-week period.  R = raised; S = spent; and C = cash-on-hand:

Democratic primary for mayor of Buffalo

  • Sean Ryan – R – $346,831 including $150,000 transferred from Ryan for Senate and $8,500 reported under the 24-hour-receipt rule; S – $402,241; C – $86,436 from two Committees
  • Chris Scanlon – R – $164,419 including $21,000 reported under the 24-hour-receipt rule; S – $479,641; C – $340,338
  • Anthony Tyson Thompson –no 11-Day pre-primary report on file as of June 17th ; from the late-filed 32-day-pre-primary report C – $3,380
  • Garnell Whitfield – R – $905; S -$9,767; C -$5,488
  • Rasheed Wyatt – R – $8,087; S – $17,899; C – $14,962

Republican primary for supervisor of Amherst

  • Dan Gagliardo – R – $15,699, which includes a $10,000 personal loan; S – $12,009; C – $20,849
  • Dennis Hoban – R – $50; S – $3,338; C – $37,004

Except for contributions of $1,000 or more which must be reported within 24 hours of receipt the post-election filings are due on July 15.

Early voting

Early voting continues every day through June 22.  Here is a link to the Erie County Board of Election information about hours of operation and locations for early voting:  EARLYVOTING 2022 AUG.pub

Publisher’s note

Given that the primary elections are on Tuesday, June 24th, the next edition of Politics and Other Stuff will be published on Wednesday, June 25th.

Bluesky  @kenkruly

Twitter/X  @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Trump Supreme Court battle could be dismantled by Congress members’ own history



New evidence is emerging that could deal a major blow to President Donald Trump's case for stripping birthright citizenship to the children of immigrants.

The president has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to restore “the original meaning” of the 14th Amendment, which his lawyers argued in a brief meant that “children of temporary visitors and illegal aliens are not U.S. citizens by birth," but new research raises questions about what lawmakers intended the amendment to do, reported the New York Times.

"One important tool has been overlooked in determining the meaning of this amendment: the actions that were taken — and not taken — to challenge the qualifications of members of Congress, who must be citizens, around the time the amendment was ratified," wrote Times correspondent Adam Liptak.

A new study will be published next month in The Georgetown Law Journal Online examining the backgrounds of the 584 members who served in Congress from 1865 to 1871. That research found more than a dozen of them might not have been citizens under Trump’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment, but no one challenged their qualifications.

"That is, said Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia and an author of the study, the constitutional equivalent of the dog that did not bark, which provided a crucial clue in a Sherlock Holmes story," Liptak wrote.

The 14th Amendment states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside," while the Constitution requires members of the House of Representatives to have been citizens for at least seven years, and senators for at least nine.

“If there had been an original understanding that tracked the Trump administration’s executive order,” Frost told Liptak, “at least some of these people would have been challenged.”

Only one of the nine challenges filed against a senator's qualifications in the period around the 14th Amendment's ratification involved the citizenship issue related to Trump's interpretation of birthright citizenship, and that case doesn't support his position.

"Several Democratic senators claimed in 1870 that their new colleague from Mississippi, Hiram Rhodes Revels, the first Black man to serve in Congress, had not been a citizen for the required nine years," Liptak wrote. "They reasoned that the 14th Amendment had overturned Dred Scott, the 1857 Supreme Court decision that denied citizenship to the descendants of enslaved African Americans, just two years earlier and that therefore he would not be eligible for another seven."

"That argument failed," the correspondent added. "No one thought to challenge any other members on the ground that they were born to parents who were not citizens and who had not, under the law in place at the time, filed a declaration of intent to be naturalized."

"The consensus on the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause has long been that everyone born in the United States automatically becomes a citizen with exceptions for those not subject to its jurisdiction, like diplomats and enemy troops," Liptak added.

Frost's research found there were many members of Congress around the time of the ratification of the 14th Amendment who wouldn't have met Trump's definition of a citizen, and she said that fact undercuts the president's arguments.

“If the executive order reflected the original public meaning, which is what the originalists say is relevant,” Frost said, “then somebody — a member of Congress, the opposing party, the losing candidate, a member of the public who had just listened to the ratification debates on the 14th Amendment, somebody — would have raised this.”

Governor Hochul Announces Landmark Agreement to Support Advanced Nuclear Technology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABv3VCX6tlU Governor Kathy Hochul and Ontario Premier Doug...

Trump SHUTS DOWN CBS over STORY HE FEARED

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...