Harding Arraigned and Charged in 2 Count Federal Complaint

Pete Harding has officially been charged with two counts – including violent entry or disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. If found guilty he could be subject to up to 1 1/2 years in prison and heavy fines.
Harding will be released under heavy electronic monitoring protocols prior to further court proceedings.
His next court proceeding will take place next Tuesday, January 19, at 1 pm.
See the full statement of facts
Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Check out this twitter thread for more information on the proceeding:

Magistrate Judge Jeremiah McCarthy is presiding. 

Criminal complaint against Harding is from DC District Court dated 1/11/21. 

Harding is charged in a 2 count complaint from DC District – violating 18 usc 1752 (a)(1) and (a)(2) unlawfully being on federal grounds. 

Second count is Title 40 USC 5104(e)(2)(c) violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. Max for both is 1.5 years and a fine. 

Harding is represented by Jason DiPasquale and Jeremy Schwartz. He will be pleading not guilty. 

Probation has 10 conditions of release recommended, and the Government consents to those. Harding’s counsel objects to some of it because he contacted the FBI on his own and these are misdemeanors. 

The Defendant left his house on 1/12 after his face was shown on the wanted poster and stayed with a friend. They are not asking for detention, but because he absented himself at that time, the govt believes monitoring is necessary. 

The Defendant was in the Capitol on 1/6 to interfere with government, and he may do this again. He posted to Facebook things that expressed a desire to do it again. “We learned how strong our numbers are if we can take the Capitol there is nothing we can’t accomplish.” 

Given Harding’s desire to promote and engage in similar future conduct and disruptions to constitutional process, monitoring is reasonably necessary. 

The government had to go looking for Harding after the FBI posted his picture, and this justifies monitoring per the govt. DiPasquale notes he was still in WNY and he did not flee when he learned of imminent charges. He cooperated with the FBI at arrest. 

He owns a house in OP and Cheektowaga and has ties to the community. He is a lifelong resident of WNY. He has an adult daughter in the area and poses no flight risk. He has no prior history of rioting. 

There are no allegations in the affidavit that he engaged in any destructive behavior while in the Capitol. 

His intention was to protest peacefully and that he was non-violent while in the Capitol. Harding is self-employed in construction. Harding raises his hand to say something. 

His lawyer tells him to be quiet. Judge rules: Electronic monitoring is reasonable. Mr. Harding is to travel only within WDNY and to the DC District but only for those court proceedings. 

The judge adopts all of the probation recommendations. He must remain at a verifiable address, stay in WDNY, only travel to DC for court, no firearms allowed, avoid contact w potential witness/victim, abide by conditions of location monitoring program, has curfew, and will pay. 

He must not tamper with monitoring. He will participate with computer monitoring, and inform them of any devices to which he has access and probation can install apps to monitor them. 

Probation can review his computer and phone and hard drives whenever they want, and they can copy any media and peripherals. He will have to report within 72 hours to probation. 

DC District has a return date next week at 1pm for Harding to appear via remote proceeding. Next Tuesday at 1pm is his DC District appearance. 

/end 

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Related articles

Joey Bosa: “The Energy Was Really Good” | Buffalo Bills

Defensive End Joey Bosa addressed the media...

‘Something dark might be coming’: Senator issues ominous Trump warning after Kirk killing



A Democratic US senator over the weekend issued an ominous warning about Republicans using the murder of Charlie Kirk as a pretext to clamp down on political speech.

In a lengthy social media post on Sunday, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) outlined how President Donald Trump and his allies look set to wage a campaign of retribution against political adversaries by framing them as accomplices in Kirk’s murder.

“Pay attention,” he began. “Something dark might be coming. The murder of Charlie Kirk could have united Americans to confront political violence. Instead, Trump and his anti-democratic radicals look to be readying a campaign to destroy dissent.”

Murphy then contrasted the recent statements by Republican Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, who accurately stated that political violence is not confined to a single political ideology, with those of Trump and his allies, who have said such violence is only a problem on the left.

Murphy highlighted a statement from Trump ally and informal adviser Laura Loomer, who said that she wanted “Trump to be the ‘dictator’ the left thinks he is” and that she wanted “the right to be as devoted to locking up and silencing our violent political enemies as they pretend we are.”

He then pointed to Trump, saying that progressive billionaire financier George Soros should face racketeering charges even though there is no evidence linking Soros to Kirk’s murder or any other kind of political violence.

“The Trump/Loomer/Miller narrative that Dems are cheering Kirk’s murder or that left groups are fomenting violence is also made up,” he added. “There are always going to be online trolls, but Dem leaders are united (as opposed to Trump who continues to cheer the January 6 violence).”

Murphy claimed that the president and his allies have long been seeking a “pretext to destroy their opposition” and that Kirk’s murder gave them an opening.

“That’s why it was so important for Trump sycophants to take over the DoJ and FBI, so that if a pretext arose, Trump could orchestrate a dizzying campaign to shut down political opposition groups and lock up or harass its leaders,” he said. “This is what could be coming—now.”

Early in his second term, the president fired FBI prosecutors who were involved in an earlier political violence case—the prosecution of people involved in the violent attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 by Trump supporters who aimed to stop the certification of the 2020 election.

A top ethics official and a lawyer who spoke out against the president’s anti-immigration policy are among those who have been fired from the DOJ.

Murphy ended his post with a call for action from supporters.

“I hope I’m wrong. But we need to be prepared if I’m right,” he said. “That means everyone who cares about democracy has to join the fight—right now. Join a mobilization or protest group. Start showing up to actions more. Write a check to a progressive media operation.”

One day after Murphy’s warning, columnist Karen Attiah announced that she had been fired from The Washington Post over social media posts in the wake of Kirk’s death that were critical of his legacy but in no way endorsed or celebrated any form of political violence.

“The Post accused my measured Bluesky posts of being ‘unacceptable,’ ‘gross misconduct,’ and of endangering the physical safety of colleagues—charges without evidence, which I reject completely as false,” she explained. “They rushed to fire me without even a conversation. This was not only a hasty overreach, but a violation of the very standards of journalistic fairness and rigor the Post claims to uphold.”

Attiah only directly referenced Kirk once in her posts and said she had condemned the deadly attack on him “without engaging in excessive, false mourning for a man who routinely attacked Black women as a group, put academics in danger by putting them on watch lists, claimed falsely that Black people were better off in the era of Jim Crow, said that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake, and favorably reviewed a book that called liberals ‘Unhumans.‘”

Tucker Carlson Bashes Netanyahu to JD Vance Over ‘Disgusting’ Tribute to Charlie Kirk

Tucker Carlson not-so-subtly ripped Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his tribute to Charlie Kirk, saying it was "disgusting" to use Kirk's murder

The post Tucker Carlson Bashes Netanyahu to JD Vance Over ‘Disgusting’ Tribute to Charlie Kirk first appeared on Mediaite.