Government meetings are secret – and legal

State law mandates that local legislative bodies conduct their business in public. But a loophole allows elected officials to caucus in private, and a new report finds that many legislative bodies do.

The Erie County Legislature is among those that not only caucus, but discuss public matters, according to a new study released by the New York Coalition for Open Government

These “secret meetings” held behind closed doors throughout the state’s local governments “completely gut” the Open Meetings Law, leaving the public in the dark, according to the report. 

“The public meeting becomes just a show or just a sham. And I don’t think enough people are aware of this,” said Paul Wolf, the coalition’s president.

The coalition’s study, released Jan. 26, was based on a survey of 57 county legislatures to determine how many conducted private caucus meetings. Fourteen counties responded; the coalition obtained information on an additional 13. Twenty-three of the 27 acknowledge holding private caucus meetings.

Erie County’s Legislature admitted to discussing public business during political caucus meetings, according to the coalition’s results. Greene, Otsego, Seneca and Steuben counties also admitted to the practice. 

However, Erich Weyant, the Erie County Legislature’s chief of staff, said public matters are not discussed during the legislature’s caucus meetings. He said he is unaware who responded to the coalition’s survey.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter


Regardless, Wolf believes the lack of transparency in government throughout the state is a disservice to its citizens.

“Whenever politicians go in a back room to talk about public business, that’s not a good thing,” Wolf said. “There’s just no way to monitor what’s occurring, why they’re doing things.”

Local governments, however, are not breaking the Open Meetings Law. 

County legislatures, city councils and other government bodies are shielded by an amendment to the law made in 1985. The amendment states political parties may meet in private “without regard to (i) the subject matter under discussion, including discussions of public business.”


Donate to support our nonprofit newsroom


In Erie County, the majority party — seven Democrats — has the ability to discuss public matters behind closed doors before legislative meetings without including the other four other members of the Legislature, three Republicans and a Conservative.

“Preceding full legislative meetings, each party holds a caucus to review agenda items,” the Erie County Legislature’s website says. “The caucuses are presided over by the leaders of the respective parties.”

These caucus meetings are separate from the legislative work sessions that are open to the public. During work sessions, each party combines in a “joint caucus.”

The coalition pointed out that this loophole has led to public representatives “holding private closed door meetings, where everything is discussed and worked out prior to any public meeting.”

The 1985 exemption allows for “deliberations of political committees, conferences and caucuses.”

Wolf said: “When they do that behind closed doors, we’re completely left in the dark as to what’s really going on.” 

“The state Legislature certainly made [the exemption] for themselves,” Wolf said. “And the state legislature will frequently exempt themselves from laws that they require others to follow.”

The exemption allowing private political caucuses has drawn criticism and lawsuits, including a 1992 lawsuit by The Buffalo News against the Buffalo Common Council. 

That same year, a bill was proposed in the state Senate that would “repeal” the political caucus exemption and “open the decision making process up to public scrutiny both at the state and local level.”

The legislation didn’t pass. 

However, when Democrats on Buffalo’s Common Council — that is, all of them — caucus before a voting session, those meetings are open to the public and broadcast live on Facebook. The Erie County Legislature’s party caucuses, meanwhile, remain closed and none of its meetings are broadcast on any platform.

Wolf’s outlook on the possibility of eliminating the law’s exemption does not waver.

“Our hope is, with this report, we can shine a light on this, build some momentum to make some changes and correct this,” he said.

The post Government meetings are secret – and legal appeared first on Investigative Post.

Related articles

Secretive state board gives Amazon another break

Site work is underway for the Town of Niagara...

UB’s Carbon Reduction Challenge: New Strategies for WNY Emissions

Class allows students to work with local organizations on...

Trump attorney gets schooled on the law by witness: ‘It’s not illegal in New York’



Manhattan Criminal Court — Donald Trump's attorney was schooled on the law by the former president's ex-attorney Michael Cohen as he sat in the witness box during his cross-examination Thursday.

Cohen delivered his lesson to attorney Todd Blanche, the lead defender in Trump's criminal hush money case, as the two discussed conversations that Trump's former fixer had recorded.

Blanche took a stern tone when he demanded to know if Cohen had informed those he recorded of that fact, and appeared astounded when Cohen said he had not.

But Cohen remained calm as he said into the microphone, "It’s not illegal in New York."

New York allows "one-party consent," which allows anyone participating in a conversation to legally record it without informing other parties.

This check did not stop Blanche from pushing Cohen on recorded conversations he shared with reporters such as New York Times Maggie Haberman and with clients who Blanche argued were unilaterally protected by privilege.

When Blanche asked if there were any exceptions to attorney-client confidentiality, Cohen yet again had an answer: the rule that mandates lawyers to disclose conversations — advice for example — that would contribute to criminal activity.

ALSO READ: Trump told to pay up before rallying in N.J. town he previously stiffed

Blanche sputtered a question asking incredulously if Cohen was claiming to have relied on this exception. Again, Cohen was calm.

"You asked if there were exceptions," a deadpan Cohen replied. "And I said 'Yes, the crime-fraud exception."

This exchange occurred on the second day of Cohen's courtroom battle with Blanche in the Manhattan criminal courtroom where Trump stands accused of falsifying business records to conceal hush money paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Trump pleaded not guilty, denies an affair with Daniels and contends he is the victim of a political witch hunt, without evidence.

Blanche had a rocky start Thursday morning that saw his request to consult Judge Juan Merchan swiftly shut down with a resounding "No."

His jab at members of Congress fell flat, and in front of several Republican House members who came to the New York City courtroom to back up Trump.

ALSO READ: 'Bootlickers': GOP lawmakers supporting Trump nailed by protest sign at hush money trial

The morning's session also saw Merchan sternly order Blanche to fix a problem raised by prosecutor Josh Steinglass that Blanche had unfairly suggested Cohen was engaged in improper conduct tied to the District Attorney's criminal indictment.

Anxiety mounts as dad awaits son’s sentencing in Turks and Caicos

(NewsNation) — Tyler Wenrich is one of five Americans who...

Facebook posts – Jay-Z didn’t bribe country radio stations to play Beyoncé’s songs. This claim started as satire

“Jay-Z paid more than $20 million to country radio stations to play Beyoncé songs so she’d top the Billboard country charts.”