Watergate prosecutor can’t figure out why Trump wasn’t prosecuted the minute he left office

Former Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks can’t understand why Donald Trump wasn’t immediately indicted after leaving the White House.

Speaking to MSNBC on Sunday with Vanity Fair reporter Molly Jong-Fast, Wine-Banks explained that even before Jan. 6 and the documents scandal, Trump had a list of crimes involving obstruction of justice and campaign finance violations linked to the Stormy Daniels hush money payments.

“I think we need to hold the former president responsible for all of his crimes and not just because there are all of the things that led up to Jan. 6th, the big lie, and all of the things that founded, including trying to disassemble the Department of Justice, trying to have fake electors, trying to pressure Mike Pence, all of those things are part of Jan. 6, Mar-a-Lago is another element,” she explained. “But that does not take away from the crimes that he may have committed before that.”

She confessed she didn’t quite know why Trump has managed to escape any accountability thus far.

“And it has always been strange to me that he was not indicted as soon as he left the presidency,” said Wine-Banks. “Because he was named in the indictment of Michael Cohen, as the ‘Person Number One.’ It was said that the crime was committed for the benefit of ‘Person Number One.’ And that was clearly him. So, I think that it is just sort of cleaning up the statute of limitations on that is more than likely to run quickly, and so it will get more attention now because of the statute of limitations. It should not in any way interfere with all the other things that are going on.”

Jong-Fast noted that Pence and other 2024 GOP candidates have been trying to figure out how to “strip away the Trump base from Trump by being not anti-Trump, but not necessarily pro-Trump.”

She said that the Republicans think that it’ll work for them, but they’re wrong.

“I think that it is very unlikely that the people who were chanting that he should be hung are going to be his perspective voters,” said Jong-Fast. “I don’t think that it matters what he does, I don’t think it matters to win those voters. He’s trying to have it both ways, you know, he’s not brave enough to stand up to Trump. He doesn’t want the death threats from the Trump people, but in the same sense, those people will never forgive him for not overturning the 2020 election. So, I think that they are afraid to confront the base, until they confront the base and until they take that pain, the base belongs to Trump.”

See the conversation below or at the link here:


Watergate prosecutor can’t figure out why Trump wasn’t prosecuted the minute he left office

www.youtube.com

Related articles

Chicken Dinner at St. Stan’s on Sunday, May 19th

This is a great way to support the Mother Church of Polonia!

Trump attorney gets schooled on the law by witness: ‘It’s not illegal in New York’



Manhattan Criminal Court — Donald Trump's attorney was schooled on the law by the former president's ex-attorney Michael Cohen as he sat in the witness box during his cross-examination Thursday.

Cohen delivered his lesson to attorney Todd Blanche, the lead defender in Trump's criminal hush money case, as the two discussed conversations that Trump's former fixer had recorded.

Blanche took a stern tone when he demanded to know if Cohen had informed those he recorded of that fact, and appeared astounded when Cohen said he had not.

But Cohen remained calm as he said into the microphone, "It’s not illegal in New York."

New York allows "one-party consent," which allows anyone participating in a conversation to legally record it without informing other parties.

This check did not stop Blanche from pushing Cohen on recorded conversations he shared with reporters such as New York Times Maggie Haberman and with clients who Blanche argued were unilaterally protected by privilege.

When Blanche asked if there were any exceptions to attorney-client confidentiality, Cohen yet again had an answer: the rule that mandates lawyers to disclose conversations — advice for example — that would contribute to criminal activity.

ALSO READ: Trump told to pay up before rallying in N.J. town he previously stiffed

Blanche sputtered a question asking incredulously if Cohen was claiming to have relied on this exception. Again, Cohen was calm.

"You asked if there were exceptions," a deadpan Cohen replied. "And I said 'Yes, the crime-fraud exception."

This exchange occurred on the second day of Cohen's courtroom battle with Blanche in the Manhattan criminal courtroom where Trump stands accused of falsifying business records to conceal hush money paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Trump pleaded not guilty, denies an affair with Daniels and contends he is the victim of a political witch hunt, without evidence.

Blanche had a rocky start Thursday morning that saw his request to consult Judge Juan Merchan swiftly shut down with a resounding "No."

His jab at members of Congress fell flat, and in front of several Republican House members who came to the New York City courtroom to back up Trump.

ALSO READ: 'Bootlickers': GOP lawmakers supporting Trump nailed by protest sign at hush money trial

The morning's session also saw Merchan sternly order Blanche to fix a problem raised by prosecutor Josh Steinglass that Blanche had unfairly suggested Cohen was engaged in improper conduct tied to the District Attorney's criminal indictment.

Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck not speaking to divorce attorneys: Insiders

Welcome to The Scoop — the ultimate back-to-the-office water...

UB Receives $1.77M Grant for Oxygen Metabolism Mapping Toolset

The new technology could expand access to medical imaging;...