The Logoff: Trump fires the watchdogs

The Logoff is a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here.

Welcome to The Logoff. Today, I want to focus on Donald Trump’s decision to fire more than a dozen internal government watchdogs, a move that has real implications for government accountability — and checks on Trump’s power.

What just happened? On Friday, Trump fired a dozen or more inspectors general, internal watchdogs tasked with investigating federal inefficiency, incompetence, and corruption. Trump did not give a reason for the dismissals, nor did the administration provide a list of who was fired. (That’s why the exact count of fired officials has varied by news outlet.)

Why does this matter? Inspectors general are a thorn in the side of administrations, as they often uncover practices that are embarrassing (or worse) to the president and his appointees. But they are a necessary check on the abuse of power, as their broad oversight authority — and, critically, their independence — helps them reveal errors and malfeasance. In a massive government moving around trillions of dollars, that’s critical, as there’s plenty of potential for waste and plenty of incentives for corruption.

Can Trump do this? It’s complicated. Congress passed a law in 2022 requiring the president to give a rationale (and 30 days’ notice) to Congress before firing an IG. Trump’s Friday night firings — which included neither notice to Congress nor a specific rationale — pretty clearly violate that law. However, some legal experts don’t believe the 2022 law is constitutional, and so it will likely fall to the courts. 

Is this normal? No. It’s not unheard of for a president to fire an IG. Joe Biden fired the IG of a federal railroad board after an investigation found the IG had created a hostile work environment (though some congressional Republicans found fault with Biden’s stated rationale). Presidents Barack ObamaGeorge W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan fired IGs as well. But by ignoring the law to fire more than a dozen IGs on his first week, Trump is engaging in a naked power grab.

And with that, it’s time to log off …

“You are where your attention is.” So begins the latest episode of Vox’s The Gray Area podcast with guest Chris Hayes. What follows is an excellent conversation about the many pulls on our attention in modern life, the importance of focus, and how to find balance. I cannot recommend it highly enough, and you can listen here.

Related articles

‘Reconsider’: Analyst says Trump’s elite supporters are getting clear message to back off



President Donald Trump's big supporters are getting a clear message to "reconsider their relationship to the regime" — and back off — as millions of people prepare to hit the streets for "No Kings" protests across the U.S, according to an analyst.

More than 2,500 events are scheduled across 50 states on Saturday and "the need for resistance is urgent," Chauncey DeVega writes in a commentary piece for Salon.

Trump has been emboldened by the U.S. Supreme Court, moving quickly to impose aggressive immigration tactics, drawing the National Guard to multiple states and unleashing attacks on the media and comedians. He's also signaled invoking the Insurrection Act and targeting "left-wing" groups.

"These lies, and the hostility behind them, reflects a larger dynamic: Trump is seen by many of his supporters as a type of god-king on a divine mission. In this worldview, resisting Trump and the MAGA movement is an act of evil — unpatriotic at best, and outright treasonous at worst," DeVega writes.

His supporters could now see the mounting tension and decide where they stand, the writer argues. And some might have a different view.

"But America is still a democracy, albeit an increasingly weak one, and Trump still needs to maintain a veneer of public support," DeVega writes. "Protests and mass mobilization threaten his legitimacy. They counter the narrative that Trump and the MAGA movement enjoy unstoppable, popular momentum. No Kings will remind political bystanders — and the undecided — that resistance is not futile. Such protests can also send a signal to elites that it may be in their self-interest to reconsider their relationship to the regime."

The protests Saturday could also have a negative impact and empower Trump to move further into attack mode.

"But protests and marches also provide an opportunity for autocrats to expand their power," DeVega writes. "Trump has repeatedly signaled his desire to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow him to bypass the courts and to 'legally' deploy the military against the American people to put down 'civil unrest' or a 'rebellion.' Such a move could also be a prelude to de facto martial law, cancelling elections and suspending other civil rights and freedoms."

It could set the stage for the Trump administration's increased retaliation against people pushing back — and the stakes are high as people resist.

"Many have observed that Trump, with his actions against Democratic-led cities like Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Portland and Chicago, is looking to create a pretext for a much harsher crackdown. This makes Saturday’s No Kings protests even more consequential. In the event of any violence, whether from protesters or agent provocateurs, the president will doubtless seize on it to expand his power," DeVega explains.

"While important, attending No Kings protests is a beginning and not an end. It should be seen as a first step of sustained political activity to slow down the Trump administration and MAGA movement’s attempts to end multiracial democracy," DeVega writes.

Yes Jackson, that is definitely a good thing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLV87mEunUI