Raw Story

Shortly after his tumultuous meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday, President Donald Trump issued a statement indicating that he would abandon Ukraine, which he accused of not wanting to make "peace" with Russia.

"I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations," Trump wrote on his Truth Social page Friday. "I don’t want advantage, I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace."

ALSO READ: 'Gotta be kidding': Jim Jordan scrambles as he's confronted over Musk 'double standard'

Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance each took turns berating Zelenskyy to his face on Friday, with Vance calling the Ukrainian leader ungrateful for the assistance America has given and Trump accusing Zelenskyy of having a supposedly irrational hatred of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has been bombing and invading his country for more than three years now.

President Donald Trump yelled at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office after the latter challenged Trump's facts and corrected his false information.

Zelenskyy was set to visit for an agreement about sharing rare earth minerals from Ukraine. The meeting began in a polite way but went off the rails when reporters began asking questions.

Former Russian Ambassador Michael McFaul called the meeting "horrific," noting he was refraining from using profane language.

ALSO READ: 'Educated America knows we are in a coup': A letter to Volodymyr Zelensky

"This was a tragedy. And a tragedy for American national security interests," he continued. "I want to really emphasize that this does nobody any good. This doesn't make the American people better off tomorrow. The senator, now, Vice President J.D. Vance, pleading for the leader of a country to pledge his fealty to President Trump and say thank you. I want to remind your viewers, President Zelenskyy said, thank you to the American people a thousand times. Use ChatGPT, Mr. Vice President, and look for it."

He also said that Vance voted against Ukraine funding, so he sees the meeting as a paradox.

"It just was shocking to me. And we need they need to sign this deal. This deal was good for the United States, was good for Ukraine," said McFaul. "And instead of signing that deal, we were relitigating [Joe] Biden and [Barack] Obama. And I just wish the president would put our interests today front and center and stop litigating what happened in 2016 or before, because that is not in America's national interest."

See the full comments below or at the link here.

- YouTube youtu.be

President Donald Trump's cuts to USAID could mean as many as 500,000 people die over the next 10 years, one expert predicted.

Al Jazeera cited health experts and aid organizations saying that ending many of the USAID programs that help those with HIV/AIDS "in many African countries could lead to hundreds of thousands of deaths on the continent."

In South Africa alone, an official at the Desmond Tutu HIV Center told Al Jazeera that cuts to U.S. funding could cause 500,000 deaths over 10 years.

ALSO READ: Whoever tells you that Trump is Christian needs to look up this passage in the Bible

Trump has ushered in massive government cuts, including international humanitarian aid that funds efforts to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS and help those who already have the disease.

Trump created the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) through an executive order and assigned billionaire South African Elon Musk the task of making the cuts. As a result, thousands of government employees worldwide lost their jobs and health insurance.

Some USAID employees were U.S. workers in other countries who were working to stop the spread of disease, help feed starving children, and collect critical data.

Earlier this month, WIRED reported one of the programs the administration cut was funding for drugs that help stop the spread of HIV/AIDS from mother to baby.

“At a minimum, 300 babies that wouldn’t have had HIV, now do,” one USAID worker estimated.

"On Thursday came news that the Trump administration had decided to stop funding UNAIDS, the UN’s HIV/AIDS programme that serves communities around the world," the report also said.

UNAIDS funds work in 55 countries.

“We will see lives lost. In excess of half a million unnecessary deaths will occur because of the loss of the funding, and up to a half a million new infections," said Linda-Gail Bekker, chief operating officer of the Desmond Tutu HIV Center.

Read the full report here.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy is meeting with Donald Trump at the White House Friday where the U.S. president is expected to claim victory for a rare minerals deal that will serve as "payback" for U.S. assistance to the war-torn nation. Trump has long sought to be reimbursed for providing Ukraine with weapons needed to push back the Russians, even thought the heads of state for Great Britain and France tried to explain this week that that's not how it's done.

In the Oval Office Thursday Trump asserted that European nations will "get their money back" from what they put into Ukraine's war effort, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer insisted that wasn't true: "Quite a bit of ours was gifted. It was given," Starmer said.

Earlier in the week, French President Emanuel Macron also corrected Trump's claims of payback: "To be frank," Macron said, "we paid 60% of the total effort...through guaranteed grants."

ALSO READ: 'Gotta be kidding': Jim Jordan scrambles as he's confronted over Musk 'double standard'

Zelenskyy and Trump have traded barbs in recent days, with Trump calling the elected Ukrainian leader a "dictator" and Zelenskyy claiming Trump was living in a "disinformation space." But in a new analysis piece for CNN.com, Stephen Collinson wrote that "[Zelenskyy] has learned a critical lesson" in dealing with Trump: Give the U.S. president "the win."

And, so Zelenskyy is traveling to the U.S. to sign a modified deal that offers less than what Trump originally wanted, but still makes him look like the strongman he aspires to be.

"The first draft of the deal looked a lot like colonial-style pillage being forced upon a desperate nation; Zelenskyy refused to sign it, warning he couldn’t sell out his nation’s wealth," Collinson wrote.

"The latest version appears far less onerous for Ukraine," he continued. "There’s talk of a joint reconstruction fund but no mention of Trump’s initial claim for a $500 billion value — which was a perfect metaphor for a foreign policy vision that sees the world as a real estate deal."

Collinson explained, "[Zelenskyy] is styling the agreement as only a framework for a future pact — largely because he’s trying to leverage Ukraine’s mineral wealth for future US security guarantees he sees as vital to the survival of any eventual peace deal."

But "just because the rare earth minerals deal with Ukraine seems likely to fall short of the president’s expectations, it doesn’t mean that he won’t market it as an extraordinary victory for himself and Americans," Collinson wrote.

Read the CNN article right here.

Collapsing consumer sentiment, prices still increasing and the double-barrelled threat of tariffs and growing unemployment numbers have some Republicans on edge, reports Semafor.

GOP lawmakers' decision to remain quiet and give Donald Trump a honeymoon as he attempts to reshape the government is quickly coming to an end as the economy struggles and it appears the president's threat of tariffs may come true which will hit American's pocketbooks no matter what he claims.

According to Semafor's Eleanor Mueller, Burgess Everett, and Shelby Talcott, Trump is "running into harsh economic reality" since being sworn in with no quick fixes on the horizon and that has Republicans already looking at the 2026 midterms with dread.

ALSO READ: Elon Musk's DOGE boys think this is a video game as Trump plots his 2nd coup

Noting "... his party will have to answer for the broader economic effects of his policies," the report continues, "Trump won’t have to face voters again, but congressional Republicans will next fall. They’re clearly conscious of the need to corral inflation while staving off recession."

According to Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) who is already facing an uphill battle to be re-elected, "the tariff regimen has to be right, or it’s going to be inflationary" while warning it could "end up being a very, very difficult cycle for us.”

Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) stated he is already hearing from concerned constituents about the coming tariffs, explaining, "They’re kind of trying to figure out what are the changes that Trump’s going to make now, and [whether] that could once again have an effect on their businesses.”

Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE) also sounded the alarm, telling Semafor, "I’m not the biggest fan of depending on [tariffs] for revenue ... the cost to consumers is something we’re talking about, and we need to be mindful of that.”

The report notes that, with Republicans becoming more publicly critical of the Trump administration, the public fretting "may betray deeper fault lines to come."

You can read more here.

The Republican Party’s sweeping electoral victories that secured them a rare trifecta of the federal government could prove to be a double-edged sword that comes back to haunt them in 2026.

That’s according to a new report in Axios, which detailed the anxiety Republicans on Capitol Hill are beginning to sense in congressional districts across the nation as backlash to the Trump administration’s slashing of federal programs and personnel becomes painfully obvious.

And the early opposition just weeks into President Donald Trump’s second term could get in the way of their legislative plan, the report added.

"It could be trouble,” one moderate Republican told Axios when speaking about political concerns surrounding the party’s main legislative priorities. "We saw what happened in 2018," the lawmaker added about the midterm year where voter anger over the GOP’s legislative agenda helped fuel a Democratic resurgence that flipped more than 40 House seats, the publication said.

After hours of dramatic vote-wrangling, House Republicans passed their budget framework on Tuesday. But some Republicans in vulnerable districts quickly distanced themselves from the budget "win," seeing it more as a ticking "time bomb," according to Axios.

ALSO READ: 'Gotta be kidding': Jim Jordan scrambles as he's confronted over Musk 'double standard'

"Last night's vote was just a procedural step to start federal budget negotiations and does NOT change any current laws," Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R-PA) said in a statement Wednesday morning.

Another GOP lawmaker, Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT), claimed in a CNN interview that the resolution made “zero mention of cutting Medicaid,” despite it mandating the Energy and Commerce Committee to identify $880 billion in cuts over the next decade, which would likely have to come from Medicaid.

The concerns come as GOP lawmakers have been berated at town halls across the country by constituents angry about the assault on the federal government ushered in by Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.

“Most of the concern now is over ... DOGE," said a second House Republican who spoke anonymously to Axios, "but there's also, maybe not too far behind that, the message that they are trying to get across on reconciliation."

Democrats, meanwhile, are "eager to exploit Republicans' struggles as the process of crafting the final package begins," according to the report.

"Health care's gone for everyone ... we just won back the House," Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI) is quoted as saying.