Shaw Still Waiting Answer About Debate in Hamburg

It’s been a month since endorsed Democratic Candidate for Hamburg Town Supervisor, Jim Shaw, issued a call for a series of candidate debates to inform voters for the upcoming primary and general elections. According to Candidate Shaw, in those four weeks, there has been no response from his opponent.

“Thirty days ago, I sent a personal letter to my opponent asking him to participate in a series of debates to inform the public about their choices for supervisor in a transparent and interactive forum.  I am frustrated that, in that time, there has been no response from this man who claims he wants to, ‘bring people together in cooperation, to listen to all sides and reach a consensus.’ Clearly his actions speak louder than his words.”

Shaw’s proposed three-part debate series calls for an initial debate in early September in preparation for the September 12th Democratic Primary, followed by two debates in October leading up to the general election on November 7th.  At this time, the Republican endorsed candidate has not replied to the proposal other than to state in media interviews that he looks forward to the League of Women Voters Candidate Forum, traditionally held in Hamburg in October. According to Shaw, the forum offers a different candidate access than a debate.

“Every election season the League of Women Voters provides an excellent opportunity for Hamburg voters to become familiar with those running for office in the town and throughout Erie County. However, their forums are broad-based, gathering all candidates for all offices related to the governance of the town. Therefore. there is limited time dedicated to any one race. Additionally, theirs is not a debate format, which means there is not the same direct and in-depth exchange of viewpoints and information as voters can experience in a two-candidate debate. The Town of Hamburg is at a crossroads in its development and voters deserve to have full knowledge of the intent and vision of the supervisor they elect to lead our town into the next decade. That is why I have challenged my opponent to a series of debates and why I continue to encourage him to reply and participate.”

The debate time clock will remain on the Shaw4Hamburg Website until an official response from the Republican endorsed candidate for Hamburg Town Supervisor is issued and received or until election day. To view the time clock, go to:  https://www.shaw4hamburg.com/shaw-campaign-news/shaw-waits-for-response-to-debate-invite-1

 

For further information on the Shaw4Supervisor campaign: Facebook and Twitter pageshttps://www.facebook.com/shaw4supervisor  https://twitter.com/shaw4supervisor .

 

ABOUT JIM SHAW: Jim Shaw is a life-long Hamburg resident dedicated to the well-being of the Hamburg Community and all who reside there. Jim was born and raised in Hamburg by his parents, Joe and Josephine Shaw.  Jim attended Canisius College, graduating with a Bachelor of Science Degree in political science. Following college, Jim was admitted to the University of Toledo Law School where, in 1973, he earned a Juris Dr. Degree. Jim then returned to Hamburg, where he established the Shaw and Shaw law firm with his brother, Joe. Since then the pair have capably expanded their client base into the largest law practice in southern Erie County, with Jim litigating almost 3,000 civil and criminal cases in his 42-year career.
In addition to his law firm, Jim has also served as Erie County Assistant District Attorney (1973-75), Erie County Legal Deputy County Clerk (1975-77), Erie County Legislature Democratic Majority and Minority Counsel (1980-1991 and 2003-2006), counsel to a number of town and school boards including Lackawanna City Schools, Frontier Central Schools, Town of Eden and the Villages of Blasdell and Farnham.
Jim is known for his dedication to the community as a former president and active member of the Erie County Bar Association, Chair of the Erie County Reapportionment Committee, member of the Executive Committee of the New York Bar Association and member of the American Bar Association. Jim is also regarded throughout Hamburg for his 50 years of dedicated community service to his hometown.
Jim and his wife, Donna (Iafallo) are the proud parents of four children and loving grandparents of seven.
www.shaw4supervisor.com      https://www.facebook.com/shaw4supervisor      https://twitter.com/shaw4supervisor

Related articles

Top GOP leader bemoans Dems are ‘holding government funding hostage’



A high-ranking Republican is blaming Democrats over a looming government shutdown.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) penned an opinion piece for The Washington Post on Monday, claiming that leaders must avert a spending crisis with a bipartisan appropriations process and claiming "Democrats are holding government funding hostage to a long list of partisan demands, totaling more than $1 trillion. And they’re ready to shut down the government if Republicans don’t comply."

Thune was among a group of leaders slated to meet Monday with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office, which includes House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).

This closed-door meeting is just hours before the Oct. 1 deadline. A White House official described this as a make-or-break moment. It's also the first time Trump will meet with the Democratic leaders since he took office eight months ago.

Thune argues that "Republicans are open to discussion and negotiation on a number of issues."

"But there’s a difference between careful discussion and negotiation during the appropriations process and taking government funding hostage to jam more than $1 trillion in big-government spending in a funding bill designed to last mere weeks," Thune writes. "Major decisions should not be made in haste. And they certainly shouldn’t be made because one party is threatening to shut down the government if it doesn’t get its way."

As Republicans urge Democrats to accept the bill, Democratic leaders have pushed back against cuts to healthcare.

Affordable Care Act subsidies are set to expire this year. And without an extension, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that more than 4 million people will lose healthcare over the next 10 years.

Thune claims that "Democrats have decided to abandon the process."

Trump CAUGHT ON TAPE as INVASION goes TERRIBLY WRONG

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Donald...

Trump Meets a Friendly Audience in Court as He Seeks To Deploy Military Wherever He Wants

Thursday saw dueling hearings related to President Trump’s push to deploy National Guard troops in blue states that don’t want...

‘Nightmare scenario’: Analysis warns Supreme Court may ‘clear path’ for one-party rule



A Democratic voting rights group was "sounding the alarm" Wednesday, warning of a "nightmare scenario" wherein the U.S. Supreme Court could "clear the path for a one-party system" and give Republicans control of Congress.

The high court is slated to rehear Louisiana v. Callais on Oct. 15, and in a new Politico report, Fair Fight Action and Black Voters Matter Fund signal that removing Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act could give Republicans a path to redraw up to 19 House seats to benefit their party.

The Voting Rights Act — the landmark Civil Rights-era legislation — has been targeted by Republicans, aiming to remove this particular section, Politico reports.

The move would "clear the path for a one-party system where power serves the powerful and silences the people,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founder LaTosha Brown said in a statement.

The ruling could also ultimately remove 30% of Congressional Black Caucus seats and 11% of Congressional Hispanic Caucus seats, according to Salon.

This could leave limited options for Democrats.

"Democrats could also find ways to use any changes to the VRA to their benefit. The party could redraw maps in heavily-blue areas with VRA protections to try and expand their margins, but there will be fewer opportunities," Politico reports.

The law has been used to offer protections against racial gerrymandering in redistricting, a topic that's become a key move ahead of midterm elections amid President Donald Trump's push to maintain GOP control in Congress, putting pressure on Republicans to redraw district lines and saying "there could very well be consequences" if they don't take action.