BUFFALO POLICE ADVISORY BOARD CALLS ON THE COMMON COUNCIL POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TO ACQUIRE BPD DOCUMENTATION FOR ANALYSIS

On Monday January 25th, the PAB presented recommendations to the Common Council Police Oversight Committee regarding BPD data collection and reporting on the BolaWrap pilot, implementation of Mental Health Diversion, and the need for a new, independent oversight structure. Councilmembers failed to facilitate or engage in substantive discussion or ask any follow-up questions of these policy recommendations. The Council is the local oversight body with the most resources and legal authority to engage in oversight and, yet, the Council did nothing to collaboratively work with, support, or substantively examine the research-based recommendations made by its own advisory body.Councilman Wyatt asked one question of the board (whether it had met with the BPD yet on the recommendations). When the PAB responded that additional help was needed by the volunteer board to do the work it was created to do and that it would be helpful if the Council requested documentation of policy and policy initiatives or drafts from the BPD for substantive discussion and negotiation by all three bodies, Councilman Wyatt and all other Councilmembers said nothing. The PAB has asked for meetings with the BPD more than once in 2020 and received no response. The PAB has informed the Council of this during committee meetings. The Council is aware that the BPD does not want additional oversight and has shirked board and Council requests, and, still, the Council has failed to use its subpoena and investigatory powers to demand information and attendance from the BPD.

Councilman Wingo focused his entire follow up to the board’s presentation on his dislike for the board’s new use of Emeritus roles for the purpose of additional resourcing of the unfunded board operated entirely by volunteers (largely) holding full-time jobs. Councilman Wingo acknowledged that the volunteer run board needs resources to operate, but stated that the Council is a resource to the board because it has subpoena power. Unfortunately, Councilman Wingo’s offering of assistance falls flat. Again, the Council holds subpoena and investigatory powers, is the only body in our current oversight structure that holds these powers, and does not use them. The Council routinely defers its authority to the BPD and Mayor’s office, makes empty demands of the BPD when the cameras are on, talks about its powers but doesn’t use them, and attempts to delegate its own work to the part-time, volunteer run board. Instead, the Council could utilize any of the recommendations from the PAB’s numerous reports on Oversight, BolaWraps, Mental Health Diversion, Use of Force, and Body Cams to do its job and pass new law or serve as a check and balance in our local government through evaluative or investigatory measures.

The PAB calls on Committee Chairman Rivera, Councilman Wingo, and Councilman Wyatt, along with all other Councilmen, to use the power that they stated they have to play an active and substantive role in oversight. Buffalo does not need more showmanship. Buffalo needs functional oversight and its elected officials owe that to the community at-large and to the residents who elected them.

The PAB would like the Council to formally request and use its powers to acquire all documentation related to mental health and BolaWrap initiatives that the BPD has drafted and/ or finalized, as well as documented data collection plans regarding the initiatives. Though the BPD has put the BolaWrap pilot on hold temporarily, the Council and the public should see existing pilot policy and procedure. Additionally, the BPD and Council play a role in any County operated mental health diversion program. The BPD and Council swept PAB recommendations under the rug by deferring to the County. The Council should request existing County diversion pilot documents and current BPD mental health policies and procedures in order to properly assess the role of all key players, determine how internal BPD policy should be revised in relation to the County pilot, and determine how the City can financially contribute to the pilot. The Council should analyz

Related articles

GOP operative loses appeal of conviction for funneling Russian money to Trump campaign



A federal appeals court has upheld the conviction of a Republican operative who had been pardoned by Donald Trump in the waning days of his presidency.

The District of Columbia Circuit Court rejected an appeal by Jesse Benton, a former senior aide to Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. Rand Paul, of his November 2022 conviction for orchestrating a scheme to conceal a $100,000 donation from a Russian national to his GOP consulting firm — and pocketing most of it.

Russian businessman Roman Vasilenko wired the money under his own name to the consulting firm, but Benton kept $75,000 for himself and gave $25,000 under his name to the presidential campaign for Trump, who posed for a photo with Vasilenko. Benton then filed a false report with the Federal Election Commission to conceal the source of the funds, the court found.

The Trump campaign was not aware of the true source of that donation.

Benton had appealed the conviction, saying Trump's 2020 pardon should have prevented the jury from hearing about his previous election crimes before convicting him of the newer charges.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

However, prosecutors argued that the unusual manner in which Trump handed out pardons by sidestepping the Justice Department's Office of the Pardon Attorney should have allowed them to present evidence of Benton's previous conviction for bribing an Iowa politician to switch his endorsement in 2011 to Ron Paul's long-shot presidential campaign.

The 45-year-old Benton, who is married to Ron Paul's granddaughter, was sentenced to 18 months in prison for that straw donor scheme.

UB team receives funding to demonstrate effectiveness of ‘food-is-medicine’ in health care

American Heart Association-funded project will assess the successes and challenges...

The Supreme Court will decide Donald Trump’s immunity case. Here are the arguments

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers will appear April 25 before the Supreme Court to argue Trump’s case for legal immunity from prosecution. Here’s a rundown of arguments from both sides.

Trump Media scrambles to stop short sellers from tanking share prices



Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social, is scrambling to stop short sellers from tanking its share values.

NBC News reports that Trump Media this week sent around suggestions to shareholders to prevent their shares in the company from winding up in the hands of short sellers who are essentially betting on the company's failure to make money.

According to NBC, the "tips include holding DJT shares in a cash account at a brokerage firm as opposed to a margin account, 'opting out of any securities lending program,' moving Trump Media shares to the company’s designated transfer agent, and transferring shares to a bank and 'holding them in your retirement account.'"

Short sellers essentially pay brokerage firms fees to borrow shares on a temporary basis on the belief that the shares will sink in price.

READ MORE: From 'really rich' to begging: Inside Trump's U-turn on one of his first campaign lies

After borrowing the shares, the short sellers proceed to sell them on the open market and then by them back by a specific date when they have to be returned to their owners.

If the share price in that time has indeed gone down, then the short sellers pocket the difference they made between the original sale and the repurchase.

If the share price increases, however, the short sellers lose money because they'll be buying back the shares at a higher price than the original sale.

Short sellers have swarmed to Trump Media shares for weeks now, as its price has plummeted from a high of $66.22 on March 27th to a low of $22.84 on Tuesday, although its price has recovered some of that lost value in the last day-and-a-half of trading.

The longer-term threat to Trump Media's value likely isn't short sellers, however, but simply a lack of profitability. The selloff in shares started earlier this month when the company released an earnings report showing that it lost $58 million in the last fiscal year while generating just $4 million in revenues.