FactChecking GOP’s Censorship Claim in Arizona Over Deleted Tweets

Republican officials have called for state and federal investigations of Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs after learning her office on Jan. 7, 2021, asked Twitter to review two tweets about the state’s voter registration database that it deemed to be election misinformation. Twitter subsequently removed the tweets.

Republicans claim Hobbs — a Democrat who was recently elected to become the state’s next governor — used her government office to censor free speech and benefit her election effort. But there’s less here than meets the eye.

The email asking for a review of the tweets was sent nearly five months before either Hobbs or her Republican opponent, Kari Lake, even declared their candidacies for governor. The subject of the tweets, a company that helped facilitate the state’s new voter registration database, was hired by Hobbs’ Republican predecessor, and the database has nothing to do with the state’s voter tabulation system.

On Jan. 7, 2021, the day after an attack on the U.S. Capitol that was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, C. Murphy Hebert, communications director for the Arizona secretary of state’s office, sent an email to the nonprofit Center for Internet Security asking for a review of two tweets that she said, “falsely assert that the Voter Registration System is owned and therefore operated by foreign actors.”

“This is an attempt to further undermine confidence in the election institution in Arizona,” Hebert wrote.

CIS turned Hebert’s email over to Twitter officials, who promised to “escalate” its review. Several hours later, Twitter reported that it had removed both the tweets.

The email exchange recently came to light through a lawsuit brought by the attorneys general for Missouri and Louisiana against President Joe Biden and members of his administration alleging they “colluded” with social media companies to censor free speech “under the guise of combating ‘misinformation.’”

On Dec. 4, Christina Bobb, an attorney for former President Donald Trump’s campaign, tweeted a screenshot of a redacted version of the exchange between Hebert, CIS and Twitter, citing it as evidence that Hobbs “censored her political opponents.”

Later that day, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted Bobb’s tweet and commented, “The SOS of AZ and Gov candidate, Katie Hobbs, used the power of the AZ SOS to collude w/ Twitter to unconstitutionally violate 1st Amendment rights of Americans for her own political gain. This is communism and Hobbs can not be governor. I’m calling for a Federal investigation.”

The following night, Dec. 5, Lake, who lost the governor’s race to Hobbs in November, appeared on Fox News, where host Tucker Carlson said Hobbs “worked with Big Tech to censor her (Lakes’) voters.”

“I wouldn’t be surprised if her office was trying to silence people,” Lake said.

On Dec. 6, Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward sent a letter to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich citing the “bombshell” revelation that Hobbs “pressured Twitter to remove posts while she was running to become Governor of Arizona.” The letter called on Brnovich “to immediately investigate the Secretary of State over a government agency directing a private company (Twitter) to suppress free speech.”

“The First Amendment protects citizens’ speech from the government — not the other way around,” Ward wrote. “As Americans, we have the right to be critical of our government and vocalize those concerns.”

According to Ward, when Hobbs “privately asked” Twitter to “take down messaging she presumably viewed as detrimental to her campaign,” she “may have crossed the line into unlawful coordination.”

In his first “Twitter Files” report on internal company documents obtained by sources at Twitter, journalist Matt Taibbi wrote that requests for Twitter review came from Democrats and Republicans.

“Both parties had access to these tools,” Taibbi wrote. “For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored.” 

Also missed in all of this is that the email from Hebert was sent on Jan. 7, 2021, nearly five months before Hobbs launched her gubernatorial bid, which came a day after Lake announced her candidacy.

So, the request to review the 2021 tweets — whatever one thinks of it — isn’t evidence that Hobbs “worked with Big Tech to censor her (Lakes’) voters,” as Carlson claimed. It’s also not evidence that her office was “directing” Twitter since such decisions are ultimately made by Twitter.

The Tweets

The tweets at issue come from an account that went by the name “What are you hiding?” It has since been suspended.

But we captured the tweets via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Both take aim at a company hired by Arizona to create a new voter information database.

The first tweet, sent on Jan. 4, 2021, stated, “Southerland Government Solutions (SGS) is contracted under the State of Arizona. They are supervised by the SOS to implement the new ACCESS Voter Information Database (AVID) which went live in Oct 2019. SGS has 4 sub-contractors and one is foreign.”

“Personally I do not want any of my personal information being processed or handled in another State,” the person wrote.

The following day, the same account posted, “Sutherland Global Services Inc is the main contractor for Arizona Voter Information Database and is a foreign corporation according to AZ Corporation Commission Director Ted Vogt. Is our entire election system foreign owned?”

The tweet linked to a screenshot of a 2017 certificate from Ted Vogt, then executive director of the Arizona Corporation Commission, certifying that Sutherland Global Services Inc. was “a foreign corporation organized under the laws of New York” and which was qualified to transact business in Arizona.

Allie Bones, assistant secretary of state, gave us a statement that said Hebert’s email exchange was “taken entirely out of context” and that “it has nothing to do with this year’s midterm election.”

“This is yet another example of conspiracy theorists trying to create chaos and confusion by casting doubt on our election system,” Bones said. “It’s unfair to Arizona voters and it’s harmful to our democracy.”

As for claims about it being inappropriate for Hebert, as a representative of the secretary of state, to send a message seeking review of a social media post, Bones said that was “standard practice for government entities.”

“It is standard practice for government entities, organizations, and corporations alike to report content on social media that violates a platform’s terms of service,” Bones said. “It’s the Secretary of State’s job to make sure that voters are informed about how to vote and how our election system works. One of the ways we do that is by working to counter disinformation online that can confuse voters.”

It should be noted that Hebert didn’t complain directly to Twitter. Rather, she sent her email to the nonprofit Center for Internet Security, which had set up a pathway for election officials to “report identified disinformation and misinformation.” CIS said it would forward such complaints to “the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency at the Department of Homeland Security who will submit it to the relevant social media platform(s) for review.”

Kelly Wyland, the media relations manager for CIS, told us CIS is “a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization formed in 2000 to improve the state of global cybersecurity by leveraging collaboration among government, industry, and academia.”

“During the 2020 General Election season, CIS supported elections offices by functioning as a place for reporting information appearing on social media that is about election administration and factually incorrect, such as poll times and locations and other aspects of the administrative process,” Wyland said. “CIS forwarded these misinformation reports to the appropriate social media organization for their review against their policies and terms of use. This service was established to relieve individual elections offices from dealing with the different modes and formats required by the various social media companies in reporting potential violations of their terms of service.”

But ultimately, she said, it was up to Twitter to determine whether a flagged tweet had violated its policy and should be removed.

“The decision to report the factually inaccurate information rests with the election office and the decision to act with regard to the reported content rests with the social media platform,” Wyland said.

In other words, the secretary of state’s office did not “direct” Twitter to remove the posts, as Ward put it in her letter to the attorney general, but rather it requested their review.

Arizona’s Voter Database Project

The decision to replace Arizona’s voter registration database predated Hobbs.

In 2017, then-Secretary of State Michele Reagan, a Republican, initiated a project to replace the state’s “aging” voter registration database with the newer Access Voter Information Database known as AVID. Sutherland Government Solutions, a wing of Sutherland Global Services Inc. headquartered in Rochester, New York, was awarded the $3.9 contract.

“This new system will employ the most current security protocols,” Reagan wrote at the time. “It will be hosted in the same environment that banks and the US Military maintain essential data. This shift maintains the highest level of integrity of the voter rolls in Arizona while still having the ability to grow as needs shift.”

Hobbs, who took office in January 2019, inherited the in-progress project, which was implemented during her tenure.

In October 2019, Hobbs told KGUN 9 News the new technology was a necessary upgrade and would allow voters to look up their voter information, see their voting history and make sure their status is accurate.

Richard Hamilton, who was vice president of the state sales market for Sutherland when the company won the contract in 2017, told us the person who wrote the tweets in question didn’t understand how the system works and how it relates to the election process in Arizona.

The data is all in the cloud and controlled by the state, he said. Hamilton, who no longer works at Sutherland, said that while Sutherland is a global company, it is headquartered in Rochester, New York, and there was no ability for any foreign actors to access that data any more than anyone else could gain access to the secure system.

And, he said, the voter registration database doesn’t have anything to do with the voting system – contrary to the tweet, sent by What are you hiding?, that asked “Is our entire election system foreign owned?”.

“That is a whole different set of solutions,” Hamilton said. “There is a lot of confusion about election software. The election voting tabulation system is something completely different.”

Contract documents show that Sutherland subcontracted with BPro Inc. of South Dakota to act as project director, leading the technical design of the database and implementation of it. The company, which has since been sold, helped create and implement voter registration and other election database systems for North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Vermont and Nebraska.

But regardless, Sutherland does not operate the system.

“We operate the database,” Hebert told us in a phone interview. “The state is in control of the database.”


Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. 

The post FactChecking GOP’s Censorship Claim in Arizona Over Deleted Tweets appeared first on FactCheck.org.

Related articles

Were more bills signed into law, vetoed this year than normal in Wisconsin? Here’s our analysis.

Politicians may campaign on how many bills got signed into law this year. But was it more than average?

Why America needs to know about Trump getting spanked in silk pajamas



The most powerful elected Republican in America declared war on the rule of law yesterday.

House Speaker Mike Johnson announced that Congress, on behalf of wannabee “day one” dictator Donald Trump, is going to use every power available to him and his colleagues to nullify America’s court system.

“President Trump has done nothing wrong here and he continues to be the target of endless lawfare. It has to stop. And you’re gonna see the United States Congress address this in every possible way that we can, because we need accountability. … All these cases need to be dropped, because they are a threat to our system.”

READ: Governor Kristi Noem didn’t have to shoot her dog — she wanted to

“All these cases” and potential future cases include Trump:

Sharing secrets with Russia that burned US and US ally spies.
— Inciting rebellion against the United States on January 6th.
— Running his businesses from the White House while multiple foreign governments poured cash into his properties in violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.
— Stealing national defense secrets from the White House, transporting them to Florida and New Jersey, and then lying to the FBI about them.
— Raping and then threatening and defaming E. Jean Carroll.
Criminally obstructing investigations into his campaign’s ties to Russia.
— Conspiring with Republicans in multiple states to defraud the American people with forged Electoral College certificates.
— Threatening Georgia’s Secretary of State with criminal prosecution if he wouldn’t “find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have.”
Violating campaign finance laws on multiple occasions.
— Committing tax and insurance fraud.
— Extorting a foreign leader to manufacture dirt on his political opponent.

And those are just Trump’s commonly known crimes; we haven’t yet begun to dig into other consequential crimes Trump committed to become president in 2016 and during his four years in office.

From his teenage years violating fair housing laws by marking rental applications for his father’s properties with a “C” for “colored” when Black people applied, to decades of business crimes including a fraudulent “university” and fake charity, to stealing money from thousands of employees and contractors, Trump has been a one-man crime wave his entire life.

And now, given the choice between throwing in with a career criminal or defending America’s criminal justice system, separation of powers, and the rule of law, today’s Republicans have chosen to throw in with the crook. Barry Goldwater and Everett Dirksen are rolling over in their graves.

The foundational genesis of the world’s modern democracies was established on June 15, 1215 when the lords and barons of England forced King John to sign the Magna Carta, guaranteeing they could only be imprisoned or stripped of their assets through an open and transparent legal process. It forced the British royal to submit himself to the rule of law.

For four hundred years the right of habeas corpus extended only to the British nobility, but a series of revolts in the 1600s extended it to “commoner” knights working for the king and to a few others. Over the next hundred years, these rights were more broadly applied in Great Britain and other European republics and, in 1789, to citizens of the United States.

And now one of America’s two political parties, following the example of nations like Russia and Hungary — whose leaders earlier this century rejected the rule of law in favor of oligarchy and autocracy — have similarly turned away from this 809-year-long tradition.

Republican democracy, as our Founders defined our nation, can’t survive in the absence of the rule of law.

John Adams was fond of quoting Aristotle’s saying that “no government can stand which is not founded upon justice.” He wrote the first draft of the Massachusetts constitution, and was particularly proud of his authorship of its Article XXX, which he frequently cited:

“In the government of the commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them; the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them; the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them; to the end that it may be a government of laws, and not of men.”

Republicans and rightwing hate media are hysterical about Stormy Daniel’s testimony yesterday in a New York City courthouse. Fox “News’” Kayleigh McEnany was particularly upset that Daniels was allowed to detail Trump’s extramarital romp:

“Imagine if you’re a juror on this case and you are a female juror and you are hearing these details. You cannot get that out of your mind.”

The simple reality is that all Americans should have heard, in the weeks before the 2016 election, about Trump’s coercing Daniel’s into having sex: If it had come out after the Access Hollywood tape, Hillary Clinton would have been our president, three rightwing cranks wouldn’t have been put on the Supreme Court, abortion would still be regulated by Roe v Wade, our democracy would be intact, and we’d be years ahead on getting climate change under control.

Instead, once Russian Intelligence learned that the Access Hollywood tape was going to be released on October 7, 2016 (fewer than four weeks before the November 5th election), it appears they — along with Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, and David Pecker — choreographed a series of efforts to refocus voters’ attention on Hillary Clinton and prevent the story of Trump’s previous philandering from coming out.

The Access Hollywood tape — which had been held by US news agencies for at least a day and probably several while it was being authenticated — dropped at 3:30 PM ET just 30 minutes after the DHS and DNI reported:

“The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.
“These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

Stormy Daniel’s publicist immediately began pushing her story to The National Enquirer, with negotiations settling on $130,000 and a signed non-disclosure agreement executed on October 10th.

That same month, FBI Agent Charles McGonigal, who shared multiple connections to Rudy Giuliani and was later prosecuted and is now in prison for his work on behalf of a Russian oligarch, worked out of the FBI’s New York office and was in charge of the investigation into Trump’s connections to Russia.

His office repeatedly leaked damning false speculation about Hillary’s emails, leading Rudy Giuliani to tell Fox “News” on October 26, two weeks before the election:

“I do think that all of these revelations about Hillary Clinton are beginning to have an impact. I think [Donald Trump’s] got a surprise or two that you’re going to hear about in the next few days. I mean, I’m talking about some pretty big surprises… We’ve got a couple of things up our sleeve that should turn this thing around.”

As The New York Post reported:

“It was agents of that [NY FBI] office, probing Anthony Weiner’s alleged sexting of a minor, who pressed Comey to authorize the review of possible Hillary Clinton-related emails on a Weiner device that led to the explosive letter the director wrote Congress.”

Two days later, James Comey caved to the pressure from McGonigal’s office, the media, Russian Intelligence, and Giuliani: He held a press conference on October 28th to announce a renewed investigation into Hillary’s emails. Trump rushed to the TV cameras and said:

“As you know I’ve had plenty of words about the FBI lately, but I give them great credit for having the courage to right this horrible wrong. Justice will prevail.”

Secretary Clinton was outraged, telling the media:

“We are 11 days out from perhaps the most important national election in our lifetimes. Voting is already under way in our country.”

With the Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal stories safely buried by Trump’s conspiracy with Michael Cohen and David Pecker, as Nate Cohn reported for The New York Times, the “look at Clinton, forget about Access Hollywood” (my phrase, not theirs) campaign was successful:

“Mr. Comey’s letter came about one week after the third presidential debate and less than two weeks before Election Day. At that time, most polling averages showed Mrs. Clinton ahead by around six percentage points in national polls. A week later, her lead had declined to three points. …
“Late-deciding voters broke overwhelmingly for Mr. Trump, the exit polls showed, and the Comey letter and its disclosure of new information in the email investigation was a significant part of the news coverage over the last week of the election.”

Russia’s efforts and Trump’s criminal conspiracy cost Clinton the election and now, as Speaker Johnson told us yesterday, Republicans in the House of Representatives will be doing everything they can to bury that fact and generate a whole new set of distractions as we head toward this November’s election.

When it comes to seizing power, they are telling us that they believe the rule of law, and thus our democracy, is merely an inconvenient impediment to be brushed aside. They clearly understand the importance of yesterday’s testimony and these trials.

American democracy suffers — perhaps fatally — if their efforts (and Aileen Cannon’s) cause Trump to get away with his crimes and return to the White House.

Vote. And tell your friends.

NOW READ: Inside the Trump Crime Syndicate

Why physician-assisted suicide is gaining ground in Albany

With help from Shawn Ness

New from New York

Happening now:

  • Will this be the year that lawmakers approve physician-assisted suicide?
  • Mayor Eric Adams came to Gov. Kathy Hochul’s defense of her gaffe.
  • New York sports legends visited the state Capitol today. Here’s why.
  • The state Senate is passing a long list of environmental bills.
The list of sponsors of the Medical Aid in Dying Act has steadily increased since it was first introduced in 2016.

A LONG SOUGHT LAW: Advocates have fought for a decade to legalize physician-assisted suicide in New York. They are hoping this year that the fight will end.

During any busy week in the Capitol in Albany, it’s hard to miss the throngs of activists donning bright yellow shirts and doggedly handing out stickers to lawmakers and lobbyists.

Medical aid in dying, or the right for a physician to prescribe life-ending medication to suffering, terminally-ill patients, has long been a priority for hundreds of activists who have watched their loved ones suffer unnecessarily during their final days of life.

But in the last year, the push to legalize physician-assisted suicide — which is already law in California, New Jersey and eight other states — has been gaining ground.

The list of sponsors for the bill, now totaling 80 lawmakers, has increased steadily since the current iteration was introduced in 2016. State Sen. Jessica Scarcella-Spanton and Assemblymembers Amy Paulin and Tony Simone held a packed rally this afternoon outside the Senate chamber in favor of the bill.

And key groups, like the New York Bar Association and New York Civil Liberties Union, have queued up in support of the bill, helping it gain new momentum.

The Medical Society of the State of New York also reversed its longstanding opposition to the Medical Aid in Dying Act last month.

Their cause is clear: Let people die with dignity.

But despite the increased support, the three people with the real power in Albany — Gov. Kathy Hochul, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins — have shied away from taking a position on the bill.

And Stewart-Cousins suggested movement on the bill this year — with only 16 days left of session — is unlikely.

“I believe this is a robust discussion, and obviously, we're not there yet,” she said. “It's a matter of information. It's a matter of education, and then we get to see if we can actually do things that change life for the better.”

And the push to legalize the practice faces opposition. The Catholic Conference of New York strongly opposes the measure.

Some doctors have also raised concerns that legalizing physician-assisted suicide could create a sort of slippery slope, where people who aren’t gravely terminally-ill, but instead deeply-depressed, could take advantage of the law to end their own life. They point to examples of that happening in Canada.

Dr. Eve Slater, a professor of clinical medicine at Columbia University and former assistant secretary to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, has organized a group of medical professionals who oppose the bill.

She’s concerned physician-assisted suicide violates a key provision of the Hippocratic oath: Primum non nocere. First, do no harm.

“It is suicide, and, you know, they hope that somehow by getting a physician involved that somehow makes it OK,” Slater said. She’s also worried the bill gives an avenue for those with non-terminal illnesses to cut their life short.

“The lawyers go to work and say, ‘Well, you know, how can you deny it to my client when you've allowed it for somebody else?’” — Jason Beeferman

ADAMS DEFENDS HOCHUL’S ‘COMPUTER’ ERROR: Mayor Eric Adams strongly defended Hochul after she made an embarrassing gaffe on Monday, and he said those who’ve piled on to criticize the governor are simply playing “word police.”

“I know her heart, I know what she was intending to say, and she was not trying to be disrespectful of the people of the Bronx,” Adams said.

The governor made the now-roundly criticized comments during a fireside chat with MSNBC’s Jonathan Capehart at the Milken Institute Global Conference in California.

“Right now we have, you know, young Black kids growing up in the Bronx who don’t even know what the word ‘computer’ is,” she told Capeheart while discussing a massive state investment into artificial intelligence computing.

She quickly apologized, saying in a statement that “I misspoke and I regret it,” and Assembly Speaker Heastie stood by her saying, “I don’t believe that is where her heart is.” Stewart-Cousins echoed Heastie’s words of support earlier today.

Adams spoke at length to defend Hochul today during his weekly availability with reporters.

“When you make thousands of speeches, when you’re in front of the cameras all the time, when you’re trying to be authentic and say the things that you’re really feeling, one could sit back and do a critical analysis of every sentence you say and say ‘Oh you didn’t say it this way or that way,’” the mayor continued.

“So those who want to word police in this business, you go right ahead. The people of the Bronx knew where her heart was. She’s sincere about uplifting the people. We don’t always get it right.” — Jason Beeferman

State Sen. Andrew Gounardes took a test drive in a car that has a speed limiter installed to ensure drivers don't exceed the posted speed limits.

TAKING A TEST DRIVE: State Sen. Andrew Gounardes stepped into the BMW for a test drive outside the state Capitol today. It was for a purpose: in support of legislation to install speed limiters on peoples’ cars.

The bill is designed to curb traffic fatalities, where excessive speed plays a factor in roughly one-third of deaths.

It would require the speed limiters, also known as “governors,” to override the vehicle’s acceleration, preventing it from going over the speed limit. It would only be installed for “repeat offenders,” defined as people who have gotten over 11 points on their license in an 18-month period, or have received six speed camera or red light camera tickets during a 12-month period.

The technology uses geolocation to get an accurate roadmap of speed limits. It is accurate enough to even distinguish between passing lanes and standard driving lanes.

“Nothing is in our laws today to crack down on the most reckless drivers on our streets. So we're here to say that enough is enough. We don't have to search for a brand new idea under the sun in order to solve this crisis,” Gounardes, a Manhattan Democrat and sponsor of the bill, said.

After the test drive, Gounardes said that the car would not accelerate past the speed limit, despite his best efforts.

“The drive was really smooth, but the tech works—even when I floored it, I couldn't accelerate beyond what the device permitted. It's easy to use, there's no jerking of the wheel or distracting beeps. You just drive," he said.

Dash cam footage was recorded of his drive. — Shawn Ness

FOREIGN DEBT: The former president of Costa Rica made an appearance outside of the Assembly chambers in the Capitol today to advocate for the Sovereign Debt Stability Act.

The bill gives countries that are in debt options to restructure their debts to help limit forced migration of people from the struggling countries.

“More than half of the world’s private debt is located [in New York],” former president of Costa Rica, Carlos Alvarado Quesada, said. “Creating a procedure for readjusting debt is critical for developing countries.”

Seventy-six percent of asylum-seekers in New York hail from countries that have debt crises.

“I am convinced that this is something or state can do, and must do,” state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, the bill’s sponsor said. “These institutions are here, they are based here, and they do what they do because we allow them to.” — Shawn Ness

State Sen. Joe Addabbo brought in a former Yankee legend Tino Martinez (right) and Giants hero David Tyree (left) to voice support for an expansion of sport gambling options.

FANTASY ISLAND: Senate Racing, Gaming and Wagering Chair Joe Addabbo wants to expand gambling options. And he brought some New York sports history firepower to the argument.

Addabbo today in Albany was flanked by former Yankee first baseman Tino Martinez and ex-Giant wide receiver David Tyree to push for a measure that would expand daily fantasy sports wagering.

In essence, the bill would allow for bets on the individual outcome of an athlete’s performance (placing a wager, for instance, on whether Bills quarterback Josh Allen throws for more than 200 yards in a game).

“My mom is 82 years old, and she plays fantasy football and it keeps her involved with the grandkids,” Martinez said. “It’s a great way for the family to come together.”

If approved, the measure would be added to the suite of offerings for sports gamblers, which currently include sportsbooks in casinos as well as mobile sports betting. New York already has the highest grossing online sports betting operation in the nation.

“This is a parallel track,” Addabbo said of his fantasy sports bill. “Fantasy sports is certainly separate from mobile sports betting. It enhances it.”

The Queens Democrat also wants the age of participation to be 21 and insisted the measure includes “safeguards” meant to prevent addiction as well as corrupt outcomes in games.

He expects the measure would generate $150 million in tax revenue for the state.

Having Tyree and Martinez in Albany, meanwhile, helped heighten interest in the measure. Athletes have often been enlisted to help promote legislation (and allow lawmakers, lobbyists and yes, even reporters, to geek out a bit).

Tyree said it was “a weird question” and “no comment” when asked if he was being compensated for the appearance. Martinez said he was not paid an appearance fee. Nick Reisman

ERA OPPONENTS WIN: Republicans have won the first round in a legal fight over whether New York’s Equal Rights Amendment should appear on the ballot this November.

A judge hearing a challenge brought in Livingston County concluded today that the Democratic-dominated Legislature didn’t take the proper steps before bringing the amendment for a vote, since they didn’t give the attorney general the constitutionally-mandated 20 days to review the language.

“In their rush to pass this amendment, the legislature never held a single hearing on the proposal, never consulted with outside constitutional experts, and falsely asserted this amendment was necessary to protect abortion rights in the state,” state GOP Chair Ed Cox said in response to the ruling.

Democrats, who are planning to use the amendment’s language on abortion to motivate their base this November, promise an appeal.

“According to the reading of all of our very competent counsel, the lack of the AG’s opinion does not negate the validity of our amendment,” Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins said. “We will certainly appeal that so that people will have the right to vote this November in terms of codifying our reproductive choices.”

For her part, Hochul vowed that the ERA will make the November ballot.

“Our decades-long fight to protect equality and reproductive freedom will not be thrown off track by one extremist judge, and I look forward to casting my ballot for the Equal Rights Amendment in November,” she said in a statement. — Bill Mahoney

NYPD raided illegal weed shops across New York City today. Mayor Eric Adams warned shops that they have a

WEED RAIDS: The city did coordinated raids on illegal weed shops across all five boroughs today, ramping up enforcement weeks after getting greater enforcement powers in the state budget.

“We want to close them down. And if you’re out there, we have a lock with your name on it,” Adams said in his weekly press conference.

With cinematic flair, City Sheriff Anthony Miranda appeared live on camera during the briefing from inside a shop down the street from City Hall that he accused of selling illegal mushrooms, cannabis and cigarettes.

“They have violated every statute that we have, in terms of the new laws and protections that we have,” Miranda said. “And we’ll be sealing these locations after the inspections.”

The city wasn’t previously shutting down shops caught violating cannabis control laws. Now they can, deeming it “Operation Padlock to Protect.” But Adams warned that shop owners could still challenge the rulings and apply to reopen again. “There’s still a procedure,” he said. Jeff Coltin

DATA BREACH AT CITY SCHOOLS: City Hall is continuing to work to address a data breach to the city’s public school system.

“The safety and well-being of our students is always the priority,” Camille Joseph Varlack, chief of staff to Mayor Eric Adams, told reporters at a press conference at City Hall today, adding the city has been engaging Illuminate, its former software vendor. “We have been working closely with Illuminate for a while now on this particular breach.”

An additional 380,000 current and former students saw their personal data compromised in a digital attack that took place from late December to early January 2022, the New York Post reported Sunday. The agency originally said 800,000 pupils were affected by the infiltration.

Varlack said no financial information or Social Security numbers were impacted. The Department of Education is also offering two years of free credit and identity monitoring services to any individual who received a letter from the agency.

Adams said his predecessor Bill de Blasio informed him that cybersecurity “is a real issue.” Matthew Fraser, the city’s chief technology officer, opened an office that trains young people in cybersecurity, he added.

“We’re encouraging young people to go into the field,” the mayor said. “Other cities have been hacked, held hostage, sent ransom notes. It’s a global problem, and we are being inundated every day by outside influence, other countries trying to hack our systems.” Madina Touré

Several environmental bills are going to be up for consideration by the end of session in June, among them is the Climate Change Superfund.

SENATE MOVES EARTH DAY BILLS: A belated celebration of Earth Day in the Senate means the passage of several environmental measures, with uncertain prospects for passage as the session careens toward a close.

“Our words are only as good as our actions, which is why it's imperative that we modernize our energy systems, protect our clean drinking water and address climate change,” said Stewart-Cousins at a press conference today.

Among the bills slated for passage today is the Climate Change Superfund measure, which would charge fossil fuel companies for historical emissions that have contributed to climate change. The measure would raise $3 billion annually for investments to adapt to climate impacts in New York, but it doesn’t have support from Assembly leaders or Hochul.

“Taxpayers shell out hundreds of millions of dollars a year on just trying to mediate and repair damage caused by climate change,” said state Sen. Liz Krueger, a Manhattan Democrat who sponsors the bill.

“We continue to pass our bills and we continue conversations and I'm sure they'll be moving on things too,” said Stewart-Cousins when asked about what conversations she’d had with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie about the Climate Superfund bill and NY HEAT. “So we will get there.”

Other bills the Senate plans to pass, versions of which passed last year and died in the Assembly, include state Sen. Pete Harckham’s measure (S2994) to phase out No. 4 fuel oil in buildings by 2028; his expansion of the food scrap donation program (S5331); state Sen. Nathalia Fernandez’s measure (S3328) to require more fenceline monitoring of air emissions at industrial sites; state Sen. Brad Holyman-Sigal’s measure (S1535) to require EV chargers at some state parking lots and garages and his proposal to ban PFAS in anti-fogging sprays and wipes (S992); state Sen. Leroy Comrie’s wildlife crossing bill (S4198); and state Sen. Jose Serrano’s bill to prohibit gas drilling on state lands (S724).

A spokesperson for the Assembly Democrats did not provide a list of environmental bills planned for a vote in the chamber this week. — Marie J. French

PUSH FOR GUN REFORM: A group of moms, students, advocates and lawmakers rallied at a church blocks away from the state capitol today to support a package of legislation on gun reform. 

One bill introduced by state Sen. Zellnor Myrie and Assemblymember Michaelle Solages would prohibit the sale of any semi-automatic handguns that can easily be converted into fully automatic machine guns through the use of a Glock switch.

Current Glock owners would no longer be allowed to use the mechanism. The bill would also bar the sale, possession and manufacturing of Glock switches, and it would make clear that a pistol with the mechanism is considered to be a machine gun.

Another bill sponsored by Senate and Assembly Education Committee chairs Shelley Mayer and Michael Benedetto would mandate the state Education Department to create informational materials to educate parents on safe storage laws.

“I think we have many parents who really are new to this country, new to our communities, even people that have been here a long time, they don’t know what we pass,” Mayer said. “We have to do more than expect that people will know. Given the history of gun violence we have to actually get out there and make sure that they know.”

New York United Teachers President Melinda Person said many parents are often unaware of gun storage laws for households with children under age 18.

“If this notification is something that gets into the backpack mail and saves one life, it's worth it,” Person said to POLITICO. — Katelyn Cordero

Samantha Mathis (far left), Rosario Dawson (left) and John Carroll Lynch (top right) joined
lawmakers and advocates to push legislation that would regulate the use of AI in the entertainment industry on May 7, 2024.

ACTORS PUSH FOR A.I. REGULATIONS: A star studded press conference took place on the Million Dollar Staircase in the Capitol, where lawmakers were joined by Rosario Dawson, John Carroll Lynch and Samantha Mathis in a push to pass legislation that will regulate the use of artificial intelligence in the entertainment industry.

The group is looking to pass three bills, the first requires employers to provide legal representation when a contract involves the rights of digital replication of a person’s voice or likeness in place of physical work.

This bill is on the move, as it passed the Senate Judiciary Committee today, and bill sponsor state Sen. Jessica Ramos said she is hopeful it will pass both houses by the end of session next month.

“AI is here to stay, and I’d like to say our responsibility is to ensure that labor law is keeping pace with the changes in this and all other industries where workers are trying to earn a dignified wage,” Ramos said to reporters.

“These motion picture companies are pretty much allowing these performers to lend their voice and their likeness to feed into AI, that should not happen without informed consent of the performer.”

A second bill would prohibit the state’s film tax credit for use on productions that plan to use artificial intelligence in the place of employees.

And the final bill would require all advertisers to disclose when they are using artificial intelligence in their content. Violators would have to pay a $1,000 penalty for their first violation. After the first violation they would pay $5,000 for each penalty. — Katelyn Cordero

— A prominent transit union leader plans to sue Columbia University over alleged mistreatment of school staffers during a building seizure last week. (POLITICO)

— After a tenant in Manhattan was treated for arsenic poisoning, she and her neighbors are demanding tests of their tap water. (POLITICO)

— Adams says New York City is ‘ready’ if former President Donald Trump is jailed. (POLITICO)