Our Annual Fundraising Appeal

It has been a challenging time for fact-checkers. An alarming percentage of people are vulnerable to deceptions, while at the same time knowledge of civics is on the decline

In the past year, we’ve tried to do our part by providing you the facts on COVID-19, the 2022 midterms, the impact of the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, the Department of Justice’s investigation of former President Donald Trump and the Biden administration’s legislative agenda.

Next year, partisan tensions will escalate, as the 2024 presidential election begins in earnest and the Republicans take control of the House in a divided Congress. 

We are able to cut through the noise and bring you the facts on these topics largely through the support we receive from foundations. We also receive payments from Meta for our work debunking social media misinformation on its platforms. 

But it takes more than that to keep FactCheck.org operating. So, each year around this time, we ask for your support. 

We started to accept individual donations in 2010, and we have raised nearly $1.5 million since then – mostly in small donations of no more than $25. 

Your support has helped us extend the life of FactCheck.org, which will celebrate its 20th year in 2023. It helps pay for valuable projects, including our fellowship program for University of Pennsylvania undergraduates, and fact-checking resources, such as the ad-tracking service we use for our election coverage. 

Please consider a donation to FactCheck.org.

Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page, which is maintained by the University of Pennsylvania. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806. Checks can be made payable to “The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania” with a note in the memo field indicating the donation is for FactCheck.org.

FactCheck.org is a project of the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center. The University of Pennsylvania is a 501(c)(3) organization, and your contribution is deductible from U.S. federal income taxes to the full extent allowed by law.

We are committed to transparency. On a quarterly basis, we disclose all donations that we receive of $1,000 or more on our website. (See “Our Funding” page.)

Thank you for all of your support. All of us at FactCheck.org wish you a happy holiday, and a safe and healthy new year.

The post Our Annual Fundraising Appeal appeared first on FactCheck.org.

Related articles

Cornyn rakes in record fundraising ahead of Texas primary

The Republican senator is fighting to survive a competitive reelection.

Journalists Rally in Defense of Washington Post Reporter Raided by FBI

In the hours after the FBI search broke colleagues took to social media to declare they were “standing with” Natason, sharing links to her past articles.

The post Journalists Rally in Defense of Washington Post Reporter Raided by FBI first appeared on Mediaite.

MAGA influencer who stirred ICE attacks reveals ‘grim’ future: columnist



An analyst Wednesday described how the ICE attacks in Minneapolis and deadly shooting of Renee Good were all prompted by a MAGA influencer "chasing clicks" — and showed the potentially grim future of MAGA journalism.

The Bulwark's Andrew Egger revealed how MAGA influencer Nick Shirley's "highly misleading gonzo video" led to the chaos in Minnesota. Shirley was confronting workers at Somali-run daycares and health care centers over claims of fraud in a now-viral video created unfounded allegations that spurred into a new campaign under the Trump administration to target the Somali community.

"Within days, the White House was surging immigration enforcement to Minneapolis; Vice President JD Vance said Shirley had 'done far more useful journalism than any of the winners of the 2024 [Pulitzer] prizes,'" Egger wrote.

"If this sort of person doing this sort of work can be so richly rewarded on the right right now, it’s safe to say both that Shirley will be a major fixture of the online right for a while, and that many others will try to follow in his footsteps," Egger added. "But if he’s the future of right-wing journalism, the future is very bleak indeed."

In the past, and in traditional media, Shirley would have had oversight or rules to abide by. But that's not the case now.

"Much of the old press model has collapsed entirely, especially on the right," Eggers wrote. "Guys like Nick Shirley aren’t trying to join a publication, they’re picking up a camera and trying to go viral on their own. They have no safety net, no sounding board, no mentorship, no way to grow beyond what they’re doing this minute. All they have is the zero-sum game of the algorithm: Get noticed or die. Of course they’re going to do what the algorithm demands—which, on today’s right, means snappy, confrontational, fact-agnostic propaganda for the regime. That’s what the ecosystem rewards, so we’re going to get more and more of it. If you think that’s grim today, wait till you see the future."

Social Media – No, USPS letter to employees about civil unrest is not a prediction of crisis or martial law

A letter sent to postal service employees about working during emergencies such as civil unrest is a sign that President Donald Trump will impose martial law.