‘Wild’ GOP government weaponization hearings will be loaded with Fox News contributors

House Republicans will hold their first hearing on the alleged “weaponization” of the federal government against conservatives, and Fox News viewers will recognize plenty of familiar themes and faces.

Two current Fox News contributors, former Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and former FBI agent Nicole Parker, will testify Thursday at the House subcommittee hearing, along with GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, constitutional lawyer Jonathan Turley and former FBI official Thomas Baker, reported Politico.

“They have very specific stories to tell. We’ll see what they say,” said Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), “but this hearing was needed, outside of all of the politicization.”

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) will chair the subcommittee, which includes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Darrell Issa (R-CA), to investigate alleged unfair targeting of conservatives by the Justice Department and other federal agencies, and their work will run parallel to investigations by the Judiciary Committee, Oversight Committee and other panels, and their findings will likely get widespread airing on conservative media outlets.

RELATED: ‘Conspiracy of dunces’: CNN panel torches ‘idiot’ Republican narratives about Twitter

“[Johnson will discuss] coordination between government agencies, Democrat members of Congress, and the liberal media to suppress and censor the truth,” said a spokesperson for the Wisconsin senator.

Democrats selected Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and CNN contributor Elliott Williams, a former Justice Department official under Barack Obama, to give statements but not face questioning, and a House Democratic aide said Raskin was selected to be “a calm and sober voice on what will be a wild first panel.”

“He’s going to talk about the threats to our democracy posed by this select committee and why weaponizing congressional oversight against your political opponents is so dangerous,” the aide said.

Related articles

Niagara Pride to Host 5th Annual WNY Pride 5K & Wellness Event

Sets $75,000 Goal for Mobile Pride Unit SANBORN, NY –...

‘Wah, wah, wah:’ AOC scoffs at GOP whining over gerrymandering



WASHINGTON — Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-NY, had strong words for Republicans complaining about the gerrymandering in Virginia that voters approved on Tuesday, with strong support from her party.

"Wah, wah, wah," Ocasio-Cortez told Raw Story on Wednesday, mimicking a whining baby and laughing in response to a question from reporter Matt Laslo. "Democrats have attempted and asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering, and for 10 years, Republicans have said, 'no.'"

Laslo was asking Ocasio-Cortez to respond to complaints from the GOP that it would be unconstitutional for Democrats to have a 10-1 congressional majority in Virginia, which the gerrymandering ballot measure would make possible. A Virginia circuit court judge blocked the vote-approved redistricting on Wednesday, however.

Still, Ocasio-Cortez saw no problem with Democrats supporting gerrymandering after years of opposing it when done on the Republican side. For AOC, the GOP "wanted to start this," and the Democrats are just fighting back.

"What they're mad at is they're accustomed to a Democrat Party that rolls over, doesn't fight and takes everything sitting down," Ocasio-Cortez said. "What they're mad at right now is that we are here in a new day."

She mentioned Republican gerrymandering in North Carolina and Texas, where Democrats lost seats. Trump's call for Texas Republicans to gerrymander arguably kicked off what's now seen as a redistricting arms race.

"We have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did," AOC continued. "Now the Republican Party doesn't like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people."

Ocasio-Cortez said she would "welcome" working with the Republicans to pass a ban on partisan gerrymandering.

"We have the bill right here to end this all today," she said, smiling. "But they don't want to because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape."