Republicans got sacked running Super Bowl ads last year — but they don’t seem tired of losing

One of the minor highlights of Super Bowl LVI was watching Republican candidates implode by running ads that could only charitably be described as fumbles.

Three GOP hopefuls bought pricey commercials from across the country with one common result: They couldn’t win their primaries. Losing U.S. Senate hopefuls Jim Lamon in Arizona and Dave McCormick in Pennsylvania, and gubernatorial washout Perry Johnson in Michigan, all made truly dubious investments.

But that doesn’t mean viewers won’t see something of an instant replay. Johnson has already announced plans to air Super Bowl ads in Iowa to launch a 2024 presidential bid. That’s what one does after getting busted by Michigan GOP – and left off the 2022 primary ballot — for having submitted too many fake signatures on nominating petitions.

Johnson’s 2022 Super Bowl business “guru” ad was bland, but was at least about himself, to no avail. The other two candidates tried a splashier approach.

Lamon aired an ad pathetically attempting to depict him as a Western hero in a shootout with President Joe Biden, Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Lamon lost to Blake Masters, who would lose to Kelly.

McCormick got especially classy with his ad set to crowds shouting “Let’s Go, Brandon” – MAGA-speak for “F*** Joe Biden – which wingnuts thought was the coolest thing ever. McCormick lost to Mehmet Oz, who would lose to Sen. John Fetterman.

As the world waits not so anxiously to see how many Republicans will give it a try again at Sunday’s Super Bowl XVII, MSNBC commentator Ja’han Jones pointed out the hypocrisy of it all.

“In recent years, conservatives raised the volume of their whining over professional athletes and sports leagues that acknowledge social inequality. This, conservatives claimed, broke an unwritten rule that sports and politics cannot intermingle.

Never mind the fact that their gripes largely stem from actions taken by teams and players in the National Football League, an organization known for invoking ostensibly pro-American symbols that toe — if not outright cross — the line between patriotism and propaganda.”

That’s well said. But you have to admit that sometimes the commercials are more interesting than the game at a Super Bowl. Especially when you get to watch shaky Republican candidates drop the ball so badly.

READ NEXT: Evangelical group facing backlash over Super Bowl Jesus commercials: report

Related articles

‘Are you part of the problem?’ CNN host blames Republican for violent attacks



In the wake of the shooting death of Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman (D), CNN anchor Sara Sidner pressed Florida Congressman Randy Fine (R) if his own heated rhetoric is part of the problem.

“House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries says he will meet with congressional leaders from both parties this week to discuss heightened security for lawmakers after the politically motivated shootings in Minnesota, calling the violence a ' wake-up call,’” Sidner said before introducing Fine Monday.

“You're hearing from other congressional Democrats who are asking for more police protection after that assassination and attempted assassination of lawmakers in Minnesota,” Sidner said before asking Fine, “Would you vote to grant more security for all members of Congress? “

“I don't agree with Hakeem Jeffries on much, Sarah, but on this I do,” Fine said.

“I do want to talk to you about some of the rhetoric,” Sidner said, “because there's a lot of talk about rhetoric and how this gins people up. A few years ago, you were called out for calling a school board member a whore in a text. You've called one of your congressional colleagues a terrorist. Are you part of the problem here?”

“Well, look,” Fine deflected. “I think what people write in private text messages to each other is one thing. If I had said that in a public message, I'd understand. But I do think there are issues.”

Fine then took aim at a recent Instagram post made by former FBI head James Comey that Donald Trump's allies claimed was a call for the president to be killed, saying, ”I mean, that is a call for violence when people are waving signs that say, 86, 47. I think we've heard this discussion about taking down the temperature after President Trump was assassinated twice, and I don't think people are getting the message." He was actually referring to attempted assassinations of Trump.

“Are you not getting the message, too?” Sidner interjected, “Is it fair to say that the way that you speak to your colleagues, what you say about them, and the fiery rhetoric that you also use, is also an issue?”

“It's a fair point,” Fine said, “but I think fiery rhetoric is different than a call for violence, calling evil for what it is, calling danger for what it is, acceptable. It's when you cross that line and you say, and that person should be killed. That's never a line that I've crossed, nor do I think it should be done.”

Fine later said the problem is that “these people are crazy. This guy in Minnesota, he's going to turn out to be crazy, and when crazy people hear these things, these problems, these problems do well up.”

Sidner replied, “That's something that the courts will have to determine. Obviously, in looking at his history, his friends and family certainly do not think that.”

Watch the full interaction below or at this link.



Trump tells ICE to pause raids on hotels, farms and restaurants

(NewsNation) — As anti-ICE protests continue to flare up...