What’s the point of George Santos?

Can you imagine getting told off by Mitt Romney? Can you imagine Mitt Romney telling you off, and then all the people were like, Oh snap!

Me neither.

Romney’s infamous for being a prude. He won’t swear, for instance. He scowls at swearing. He’s offended. The most he’ll say is H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks.

READ MORE: ‘Radioactive’: Santos’ press secretary divulges on ‘perfect storm’ of a job, calls boss ‘borderline genius’

Yet when he bumped into New York Congressman George Santos during last week’s State of the Union address, TV cameras caught a side of Romney no one saw before. Whoa, Mitt’s face is really red! Did he just cuss out Santos?

Holy H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks!

Turns out no, Mitt Romney did not cuss out Santos. Unless by cussing out we mean in the mittest way Mitt ever mitted. Congressional reporters quickly pieced the scene together. Romney had told Santos, “You don’t belong here.”

Now, you gotta understand. Here’s Mitt Romney, the milquetoastiest of all milquetoast men from the great state of Milquetoast whose habitual preciousness is so aggressive people fear saying hell in front of him, telling Santos, directly and without a coat of varnish, that he doesn’t belong.

READ MORE: Kyrsten Sinema spox corrects the record on her SOTU exchange with George Santos: ‘It did not happen’

That’s as close as we’re ever going to see Senator Romney get to discovering his inner-Jules Winnfield: “Honor, motherfucker, do you have it?

What’s the point of George Santos?

I’m not going to recount Santos’ lies. (The Post‘s fact-fetishing majordomo, Glenn Kessler, can wear himself out doing that if he wants to.) Recounting them lends greater credence to the figment of fugacity that is the Long Island congressman than that fugacious figment deserves. So I won’t.

I do want to point out something about him I haven’t pointed out. In the world of Washington Realpolitik, in which morality is an afterthought, there are people you respect. There are people you fear. There are people you fear as well as respect on account fearing them invokes a special kind of respect.

There’s one. There’s the other. There’s both.

But there’s rarely neither.

Only a special kind of terrible can inspire neither. And remember, this is Washington. You can’t throw a stone without hitting a special kind of terrible.

No one respects Santos, not even Republican voters back home.

No one fears him, not even the House speaker who needs his vote.

Kevin McCarthy can’t afford losing a vote. Yet he has nothing to fear from George Santos. Where’s he going to go? Who doesn’t think he’s toxic?

Nowhere. No one.

If Santos were like the Democrats’ Joe Manchin, he’d capitalize on his position. He’d flex his power. But Manchin is respected. He’s feared. He’s respected because he’s feared. What does Santos have that people want?

Imagine being worth less than your lies.

That’d be like imagining Mitt saying H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks.

Santos is a special kind of terrible – a politician without a base of power beneath him, scarcely a politician at all. What are sellers without buyers, shepherds without flocks, pop stars without fans? What would the point be?

What’s the point of George Santos?

Lies canceling the liar

I doubt he knows.

He is whatever he thinks the person in front of him wants him to be. He’s a blank, a cipher, a fetish. A there that’s not there. George Santos is never George Santos. George Santos is always already someone, something else.

Mitt Romney is many things – former Republican presidential nominee, former Republican standard bearer, prude – but he’s never someone, something else. He knows who he is. He knows why. His capacity for lying is legendary. (Just google “the mendacity of Mitt.”) But he’s always George Romney’s son. There’s a there there. The lies never canceled the liar.

Romney is the lone GOP senator who, at the end of his first impeachment trial, voted to remove Donald Trump. That cost him respect, but it gained him fear. Here was a brave Republican among cowardly Republicans. Utah’s other senator, Mike Lee, showed no such courage. He voted to acquit.

Lee was respected, but never feared, never respected because feared.

The House Republicans were set to denounce the president for his handling of a Chinese spy balloon that floated over the continental US before being shot down last week by the US Air Force. But then Mitt Romney spoke.

“I believe that the administration, the president, our military and intelligence agencies, acted skillfully and with care,” he told reporters after being briefed.

According to CNN’s Rich Galant, “House Republicans, who were initially planning a resolution condemning the Biden administration for not bringing down the balloon sooner, switched the wording to condemn the government of China for sending the craft over US territory in the first place.”

Can you imagine anyone changing their minds, much less Republican anarchists in the House, after George Santos told them what he thinks?

All he can do is self-own

No one respects him. No one fears him. No one respects him, because no one fears him. Washington is full of liars. It’s full of special kinds of terrible. Yet Santos can’t get either. He’s the especialest kind of special kind of terrible.

The thing about being a strong absence is that eventually, you’re going to be canceled by a strong presence. Matter of fact, that strong presence doesn’t have to be that strong. A strong absence can be canceled even by a prude whose back goes up at the sound of the word H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks.

He can’t own anyone the way Romney owned him. The only thing he can do is double down on denying being humiliated. If he were Jewish, instead of “Jew-ish,” he might know the meaning of putz. He isn’t, though. He doesn’t.

All he can do is self-own.

READ MORE: Serial liar George Santos has already started spending for his 2024 re-election campaign

Related articles

Republicans made a ‘tacit admission’ about midterms — and it could blow up in their face



A conservative columnist warned on Monday that her Republican colleagues just made a "tacit admission" about the 2026 midterms that could blow up in their face.

S.E. Cupp, a columnist for CNN, said during a segment on "The Source" with host Kaitlan Collins that Republicans have all but admitted that they don't stand a chance during the midterms with their push for mid-cycle redistricting. While those efforts seem to have paid off so far, Cupp warned that they could energize the Democratic base in a way that thwarts all the time Republicans spent trying to rig the election in their favor.

"Here's the thing that I think is important to point out if you care about democracy," Cupp said. "The republicans have done what they've done because they've been allowed to. But it's also a tacit admission that they know they cannot win without rigging it. They're out of ideas. They're not even attempting to win new voters or win back the voters that they've been losing since gaining them in 2024."

Several Republican states from Texas to Louisiana and Tennessee have adopted new election maps ahead of the midterms in an effort to preserve the Republican majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Cupp warned that voters can see through the Republicans' plans, and that may cause them to backfire in November.

"So this is the giddiness and the crowing I'm seeing from republicans about the state of the redistricting math and how it's helping Republicans," she said. "What they're not saying out loud is what I think a lot of voters can see, which is you had to rig it to make yourself competitive. And I don't even know if this will still make them competitive. They might actually be handing Democrats an advantage by really ginning up that base, firing them up to go and vote."