Justices who killed student loan forgiveness can’t even follow financial ethics law: Bush ethics lawyer

Former Bush White House ethics czar Richard Painter once coached Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts on ethics ahead of their confirmation hearings. Now, he is disgusted with the state of the court whose nominees he helped advise.

He appeared on MSNBC to rage against their inability to follow basic ethics, following a controversial term of decisions against a backdrop of scandal, with multiple Republican justices caught accepting luxury gifts and travel, and their families accepting paid commissions, from billionaires and interest groups with litigation before the court.

“The justices, I am sure, are off on their yachts and planes with the billionaires, and fishing expeditions and the like,” said Painter. “We’ve had a number of decision from this court the past few years that benefit the very, very well-to-do and continue to put the disadvantaged, women, minorities, those struggling with student loans.”

With respect to Alito and Roberts, Painter continued, “I am very saddened by what is happening with this court, where the chief justice says I’m not even going to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee and explain what is going on. We have no accountability for this court, no external investigation of the court. We merely rely on the justices to follow the law on their own accord. It’s not working. We have colleagues covering for colleagues, and this court has an accountability crisis, and we need to fix it.”

Painter specifically recommended establishing an Office of Inspector General for the Supreme Court, as exists for numerous executive agencies, as well as a full-time ethics lawyer advising the justices.

“The situation we have right now is a mess,” said Painter. “We have justices who can’t even fill out their financial disclosure form and determine the Ethics Act of 1978 themselves, and yet they are interpreting a law that applies to every single American. They interpreted the HEROES Act of 2003 to wipe out President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program? They can’t even figure out their own financial disclosure forms and figure out the law there, why are they determining the United States Constitution and federal statutes for the rest of America. This Supreme Court needs to clean up its act.”

Watch below or click the link.


Richard Painter on Supreme Court ethics

www.youtube.com

Related articles

Do videos show Trump falling asleep during Lindsey Graham’s funeral? We examined footage

The U.S. president seemingly struggled to keep his eyes open during the service.

Red flags fly as ‘very suspicious’ move from Todd Blanche has confirmation in doubt



CNN analyst Andrew McCabe on Tuesday pointed out that the Department of Justice never responded to President Donald Trump's IRS lawsuit — and how that could impact Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's nomination.

The former deputy director of the FBI told CNN anchor Kasie Hunt that, as Blanche's nomination remains in limbo ahead of Thursday's vote, further questions about Trump's former personal attorney have come to light.

"Let's remember, there essentially was never really a true lawsuit here," McCabe said. "The president sued the IRS for $10 billion. The Department of Justice never even answered the complaint. So, there were never two opposing parties. The Justice Department never stood up and defended the United States in the way that it did in every other suit brought by the same leak from the same person."

This was unusual, McCabe explained.

"And because of that oddity, that's a very suspicious decision on the part of people like Todd Blanche and others," he said. "The lack of a true controversy meant that the entire thing was about to get dismissed. Before that could happen, they entered into these agreements. One of them, of course, created the weaponization fund, and the second one essentially granted complete immunity forever to Donald Trump, his family members and businesses."

McCabe described the situation further.

"It was basically a giveaway from the Department of Justice to the president," McCabe said. "How this thing stands or was ever conceived — I have no idea. I've been around many, many settlements of criminal matters, some of which involved IRS criminal matters, and have never seen any language like this. I think it's absolutely unprecedented and an incredibly bad idea."

The IRS settlement became a sticking point for some Republican senators during Blanche's confirmation hearing. On Tuesday, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said there is no deal on Blanche's confirmation because of the settlement and the so-called anti-weaponization fund, Politico reported.

5 Underreported Media Stories from the Fauci Diaries

Dr. Anthony Fauci's unearthed COVID diary revealed his cozy relationship with mainstream reporters like CNN's Dana Bash and ex-Meet the Press host Chuck Todd

The post 5 Underreported Media Stories from the Fauci Diaries first appeared on Mediaite.

MS NOW Anchor Host Grills Dem Candidate On Incendiary Social Media Posts: ‘Some Words That I Can’t Say on Television’

Antonia Hylton pressed Democrat candidate David Crowley over his claim that he did not author numerous "incendiary" tweets from an account tied to him.

The post MS NOW Anchor Host Grills Dem Candidate On Incendiary Social Media Posts: ‘Some Words That I Can’t Say on Television’ first appeared on Mediaite.