Justices who killed student loan forgiveness can’t even follow financial ethics law: Bush ethics lawyer

Former Bush White House ethics czar Richard Painter once coached Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and John Roberts on ethics ahead of their confirmation hearings. Now, he is disgusted with the state of the court whose nominees he helped advise.

He appeared on MSNBC to rage against their inability to follow basic ethics, following a controversial term of decisions against a backdrop of scandal, with multiple Republican justices caught accepting luxury gifts and travel, and their families accepting paid commissions, from billionaires and interest groups with litigation before the court.

“The justices, I am sure, are off on their yachts and planes with the billionaires, and fishing expeditions and the like,” said Painter. “We’ve had a number of decision from this court the past few years that benefit the very, very well-to-do and continue to put the disadvantaged, women, minorities, those struggling with student loans.”

With respect to Alito and Roberts, Painter continued, “I am very saddened by what is happening with this court, where the chief justice says I’m not even going to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee and explain what is going on. We have no accountability for this court, no external investigation of the court. We merely rely on the justices to follow the law on their own accord. It’s not working. We have colleagues covering for colleagues, and this court has an accountability crisis, and we need to fix it.”

Painter specifically recommended establishing an Office of Inspector General for the Supreme Court, as exists for numerous executive agencies, as well as a full-time ethics lawyer advising the justices.

“The situation we have right now is a mess,” said Painter. “We have justices who can’t even fill out their financial disclosure form and determine the Ethics Act of 1978 themselves, and yet they are interpreting a law that applies to every single American. They interpreted the HEROES Act of 2003 to wipe out President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program? They can’t even figure out their own financial disclosure forms and figure out the law there, why are they determining the United States Constitution and federal statutes for the rest of America. This Supreme Court needs to clean up its act.”

Watch below or click the link.


Richard Painter on Supreme Court ethics

www.youtube.com

Related articles

How unprecedented is Joe Biden’s break with Israel over arms shipments?

President Joe Biden’s decision to withhold certain heavy weapons from Israel amid White House concerns about civilian casualties has prompted critics to call such U.S. actions unprecedented. Are they?

Republican Voters Against Trump/Republican Accountability PAC

Political leanings: Anti-Donald Trump 2022 total spending: $12.9 million Republican Voters...

Broadway Fillmore Tour de Progress (Bike Tour) Saturday, May 18

From the Facebook event page: Chris Hawley, in collaboration with the Central Terminal Neighborhood Association and Buffalo Bike Tours, invites you to join this bicycle

FC Buffalo vs. Erie Commodores

https://www.youtube.com/embed/cbCS-HFEmkQ

Expert on Trump case says lawyer’s grilling of Cohen left even him confused: ‘Needs work’



A former top prosecutor for ex-FBI chief Robert Mueller heralded Michael Cohen for being "unflappable" while testifying in Donald Trump's hush money trial Thursday.

The cross-examination of Cohen continued for the second day as prosecutors called Trump's former lawyer as a witness. The former president denies charges that he created false business records around a hush-money scheme.

Earlier this week, Andrew Weissmann revealed that he was the one who discovered the hush money paid to adult movie star Stormy Daniels while reading evidence while investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. He told Mueller it was a "blue dress problem," a reference to Bill Clinton's affair with an intern.

But on his second day of cross-examination, Weissmann had nothing but praise for Cohen.

Read Also: How a billionaire's privilege is taking down our republic

"The striking moment when you heard the voice of Michael Cohen on his podcast, which was distinctly different than the in-court Michael Cohen. That doesn't mean Michael Cohen is lying on the stand. But it is useful for the jury to see that that is not what — he is not always in the mode that he is in the courtroom," said Weissmann.

Cohen's podcast voice when he reads his opening statement is distinctly different from his conversational voice when he speaks with guests, as can be heard here.

"For every day that he has been on, whether on direct or cross, he is unflappable," Weissmann assessed.

"Even on cross-examination that mentions his wife, [and] cross-examination with texts with his daughter, which I personally think is playing poorly. The cross there is about essentially the daughter thinking how great he is and how he deserves so much. That's what you would want your child to think.

"I'm not sure that was the right decision. [Trump lawyer] Todd Blanche is doing better than the last time we saw him, [but] that's a very low bar."

"His technique needs some work," Weissmann said of Blanche. He confessed that he had a difficult time following at times — and he is an expert on this case.

"That's actually because of the techniques that Todd Blanche is using," Weissmann said.

See the comments below or at the link here.

Cohen called 'unflappable' by top Mueller prosecutor who discovered hush money scandal www.youtube.com