Some facts, observations, and heard-on-the-streets

We are at the time of the year that comes with beautiful weather, the football season kicking off, and Republicans fighting to be number 2 in the party hit parade. 

Here are some facts, observations, and heard-on-the-streets:

  • The first Republican presidential debate was … interesting… boring… just part of the new reality show TV lineup that networks are putting together while the writers and actors strikes continue.  Maybe the networks can combine the debates with some of the reality TV shows that are long-in-the-tooth like Survivor or American Ninja Warrior.
  • Ron DeSantis is reportedly coming back to Buffalo again to raise funds for his floundering campaign.  His friend, Nick Sinatra, will be hosting.
  • Vivek Ramaswamy’s childish behavior during the debate seems to have caught on for the moment with some Trump folks who are looking for a younger and non-legally challenged version of their candidate.  Some polls seem to indicate that Vivek is actually drawing Republicans away from Trump, but at the end of the day mini-me’s juvenile antics will wear thin.  He also seems to be uninformed about American government in general.
  • The Buffalo News has noted the involvement in Ramaswamy’s campaign by Buffalo politicos Stefan Mychijliw and Chris Grant, the later the owner of Big Dog Strategies.  Big Dog served as George Santos’s campaign consultant last year, even after they were informed about Santos’s non-stop lying.  Non-stop lying is also something that Ramaswamy does.  He is the 2024 version of Herman Cain, Scott Walker, and Ben Carson, each of whom having briefly led the Republican primary field in years gone by.  Ramaswamy will flame out when Trump realizes the potential threat (the ego cannot stand another big ego) and the public gets to know more about Vivek.  Enjoy the ride fellas, presidential campaigns can be fun.
  • It is right to be concerned about the few criminal matters that have occurred concerning asylum seekers who are currently residing in Erie County.  Too bad that local politicos don’t show the same let-me-put-out-a-Tweet-on-that initiative concerning crimes committed by local citizens.  Or for that matter such things as the January 6 insurrection.  Republicans seem to think that all the folks that accompanied their families and all the many others who came from Europe in days gone by all turned out to be model citizens.
  • Here is a newspaper headline you don’t see every day:  “Lorigo asks judge to overturn primary.”  Erie County Conservative Party Chairman Ralph Lorigo asked for a do-over for a Town of Evans Conservative primary where the party’s endorsed candidate lost by two votes to a candidate who facilitated absentee voting for about 55 new Conservatives.  Party leaders don’t usually complain about new folks affiliating with their organization.
  • Lorigo has a valid point about a change in the state Election Law that revised the cut-off date for changing a person’s party enrollment to mid-February.  That is generally after parties have settled on their candidates now that there is a June primary schedule in place.  Candidates who lose out on party endorsements can now round up some friends and relatives to re-affiliate and work to challenge the decision.  Seeking some sort of litmus test for party membership, however, could never work in practice.
  • The success of two or more local candidates who this year put together a party-switcheroo scheme will encourage others to give it a try.  It is not something that Democrats or Republicans need to worry about given their large enrollment numbers.  It is unlikely but potentially even easier for someone who wants to pick off the Working Families line to do so, given that party’s small affiliation numbers.  The most likely party switching target will continue to be the Conservatives.
  • In previous years such efforts were conducted under the Election Law’s “opportunity to ballot” provision which allowed for primary challenges by non-party members.  That’s how Robin Schimminger, in his first campaign in 1973, was able to wind up as the Democratic, Liberal, and Conservative candidate by defeating the Republican incumbent in the Conservative primary.
  • Given that there are incredibly few seriously contested local races in Erie County this year, turnout will be very low.  The party that does the best job of bringing out its enrolled voters will win.  In the same year of the four-year election cycle in 2015, a county executive election year, turnout was just 25 percent.
  • The race for Erie County Executive is the featured race in 2023.  The asylum seeker issue has drawn attention but will it bring people out to vote?
  • Mark Poloncarz’s campaign will soon begin their paid media effort and they have the resources to pay for it.  We won’t know until October 6 how much money Republican Chrissy Casilio is raising.
  • County government operates with an annual budget of more than $1.5 billion, running dozens of programs over a wide range of services.  Poloncarz has mastered those matters. 
  • Casilio has been a candidate for more than six months.  Republican analyst Carl Calabrese recently told WBEN that “eventually she should start talking about what she would do as county executive…”  Her only comments on such things were in March, when she discussed taxes, and last month when she said “I can’t imagine what I might do in the situation” when asked about her plan concerning the asylum seekers issue.  The election is just nine weeks away and early voting begins in less than eight weeks.  Neither the Buffalo News nor the electronic media, except for WGRZ-TV, have made any effort to determine what Casilio’s plans are for operating and managing the county.  Debates would prove interesting.
  • The departure of Michael Wooten from WGRZ-TV leaves a serious hole in public issue reporting in western New York.

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads     kenkruly

Related articles

‘Awkward guy’: White House insiders fear Vance may do ‘more harm than good’ with speech



Hours before he is expected to speak at a Turning Point USA gathering in Mississippi, Vice President JD Vance did not get a vote of confidence from one White House insider.

According to a report from MSNBC’s Jake Traylor, Donald Trump's MAGA heir-apparent will attempt to step into the shoes of the late TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk by giving a speech and then taking questions at the SJB Pavilion on the University of Mississippi campus.

As Traylor wrote, Vance will attempt to mimic Kirk’s appearances on college campuses that came to an abrupt end during a visit to Utah Valley University.

The report notes that Vance’s performance will be “graded” against how Kirk was received, and there is some trepidation at the White House about whether he will pull it off.

With Traylor writing, “He will try to avoid the potential pitfalls that accompany an unpredictable, live college debate format that could lead to him seeming to diminish the office he now holds. And he will try to not be too obvious in his angling for a 2028 presidential bid,” one White House official attempted to downplay expectations by admitting, “There’s tons of risks.”

Vance has claimed, “I’m going to do exactly what Charlie did. {Kirk] would answer tough questions from the left and from the right, and so I want to do that, too,” which has MSNBC reporting, “White House officials and people close to Vance caution that simply playing Kirk may do more harm than good.”

”[Charlie] had unique skills,” one person admitted. “Vance can be an awkward guy on stage. He’s not going to be what Kirk was, he’s just different from that.”

According to the report, for Vance to advance his hopes of replacing Trump, he needs to get organizations like TPUSA on his side.

To political observers, "his proximity to Turning Point in recent weeks highlights his growing alliance with the powerhouse youth group amid early speculation of his own 2028 presidential run,” MSNBC is reporting.

You can read more here.

UB to offer a fully online graduate degree in ontology

The applied ontology degree will prepare students from around the...

‘Haven’t seen it’: Mike Johnson roasted for playing dumb on whatever reporters ask



House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) doesn't appear to know, and he likely hasn't seen whatever video, speech, or statement reporters want to ask him about.

For the past several weeks, as reporters peppered Johnson with questions about President Donald Trump's cognitive decline, violence at the hands of ICE and other federal agents, and even things said by members of his own caucus. He answered simply that he doesn't know and hasn't seen it, heard it or examined it.

A Religious News Service reporter caught Johnson in a fib, while others couldn't help but notice that Johnson doesn't seem to know anything about anything.

Asked about a pastor being shot in the face by a pepper round by federal agents, Johnson responded, “I can't comment on any of those instances. I haven't seen or heard any of those videos…Religious freedom does not extend and give you the right to get in the face of an ICE officer and assault them.”

"Note: I asked this question, and you’ll hear me say 'yes you have' here — because Johnson was already *directly asked* about one of these instances in one of earlier shutdown press conferences," said Jack Jenkins, national reporter for Religion News Service.

It comes after Johnson was leveled by Jon Stewart on "The Daily Show" on Monday. He showed a clip of Johnson being asked about Trump's demand for $230 million from the DOJ for himself. Johnson said he hadn't spoken to Trump and didn't know any specifics.

"Uhhhh, I'm just f---ed up," Stewart said, mocking Johnson.

The day after the DOJ question, another reporter followed up, asking Johnson's opinion on it. The Speaker swore he wasn't trying to dodge the question: "I haven't had time to dig into the details."

Stewart mocked Johnson for claiming he had a lot to do, alleging it was only to cover up the investigation files surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. Republican members are out of Washington for another week, and Johnson is refusing to negotiate on the budget or healthcare. So, many people have questions about what exactly Johnson knows.

"Mike has never seen or heard of anything happening," posted CJ Fogler.

"When not appearing at a podium, does Mike Johnson go to his office, stand facing a corner and stick his fingers in his ears? The man never seems to have heard or seen anything ever," Broadway lawyer Michael Salerno questioned.

"More s--- Mike Johnson doesn’t know," said Mueller, She Wrote's Allison Gill on Bluesky.

"Can a reporter grow a pair and just say what we all are thinking already?" asked national security lawyer Bradley P. Moss. "He is deliberately refusing to look at information so he can remain ignorant. Pure and simple."

Even "Mother Jones" commented, "Mike Johnson, the perpetually unaware, strikes again."

"Has Mike Johnson ever considered holding his daily presser an hour later to give him time to read a paper?" influencer Schooley asked.

Will Rep. Jasmine Crockett run for senate?

Will Rep. Jasmine Crockett run for senate?

lead image