The Ralph Mohr Board of Elections

Over the past several months this blog has reported on the failure of the Erie County Board of Elections (BOE) to do its job in reporting on the apportionment of voter registrations as they apply to the eleven districts of the Erie County Legislature.  The Board has also failed to certify the results of the June primaries that included some contests in legislative districts.

It should be noted that while the Board is by law a bi-partisan public agency headed by both Democratic and Republican Commissioners, the failure to do what it is legally required to do in the current instance rests solely with the Republican Commissioner, Ralph Mohr, who has been at the Board for decades. Two courts now, including the State Supreme Court on Tuesday, disagree with his decisions.

The County Legislature in December 2021 approved a new plan for redrawing its districts following the 2020 federal census. County Executive Mark Poloncarz subsequently signed the bill into law. The new lines were set to run the elections for 2023 through 2031. The Board proceeded accordingly until Mohr, just before petitioning was to begin for the 2023 elections, filed a suit in federal court challenging the lines that were drawn and asked the court to redo the districts. Judge Lawrence Vilardo determined that Mohr lacked standing. He was allowed to amend and try again and the second time around he still lacked standing.

Subsequently the primary elections were held on June 27th and the results were published on the Board’s website.  The normal process after a primary is for the Commissioners of the Board, soon after the primary, to jointly certify the results.  That certification in turn helps set the November election ballot.  Mohr refused to certify the primary results even though his Democratic counterpart, Jeremy Zellner, was ready to do so.

Then on September 8th a new lawsuit was filed in State Supreme Court once again raising the issue of the legislative districts. The suit was brought by County Legislator John Mills, a second Republican candidate for the Legislature, and a Republican registered voter. It challenged the efforts of Commissioner Zellner to proceed with the Board’s responsibilities concerning the November elections for the County Legislature. Military ballots have already been sent out.

On Tuesday State Supreme Court Justice Amy Martoche ruled that the Board must certify the results of the primaries and that this latest legal action was filed too late to affect the 2023 elections. The attorney for Zellner, Craig Bucki, is seeking to have the new district lines confirmed. Attorney Jerry Schad is intervening on behalf of voters asking the Judge to rule on the redistricting. Pending a final decision by Justice Martoche the BOE is ready to publish enrollment data and maps related to the legislative districts.

The politics of all this time and effort (and public money spent) seems to raise a couple questions:

  • Do the actions of Election Commissioner Ralph Mohr represent the position of the Erie County Republican Committee (ECRC) concerning the management of the Board of Elections and the efforts of Mohr to scuttle legislative re-districting and the elections for the Erie County Legislature?
  • Are Mohr’s public actions in some way related to his or the ECRC’s efforts on behalf of the candidacy of Jim Malczewski, the appointed legislator in the 10th district?  Malczewski lost both his Republican and Conservative primaries to Lindsay Lorigo, the daughter-in-law of County Conservative Party Chairman Ralph Lorigo.  Those primaries were rough and tumble and left the two parties at loggerheads with each other.  Failing to certify the primary results certainly did not make Ralph Lorigo happy.

Justice Martoche’s pending ruling on the latest legal action offers an opportunity to clarify and mandate the responsibilities of Ralph Mohr at the BOE.

Stay tuned.

X/Twitter @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Bondi Far Overstates the Impact of Fentanyl Seizures on American Lives

Este artículo estará disponible en español en El Tiempo...

Trump admits flubbing figures in rambling trade war speech: ‘I misunderstood’



President Donald Trump spoke Monday about negotiations with China that resulted in a dramatic step back from a tariff trade war — but in a rambling speech, he revealed the talks had left him confused.

First, he told the press, "Both sides now agreed to reduce the tariffs imposed. After April 2nd, to 10% for 90 days as negotiators continue." The date was more than a month in the past as he was talking May 12.

Trump then claimed that, until they began speaking, China was "being hurt very badly. They were closing up factories. They were having a lot of unrest, and they were very happy to be able to do something with us."

"And I don't know if people realize this, but we made a great deal with China, a great trade deal. But it was a much bigger deal originally, and then they canceled it right in the last day," Trump also claimed. He appeared to be talking about a previous negotiation from his first administration, and not the one that happened over the weekend, as he mentioned former Secretary of Agriculture Donny Perdue.

"Some of your faces I remember were there when that happened. I remember you, and we had a deal where they opened up their country to trade with the United States, and they took that away at the last moment," Trump said.

ALSO READ: Trump's toadies are peddling a dangerous lie to America's working class

It's unclear what he meant, but China has been trading with the U.S. for decades. The Library of Congress page that discusses U.S. trade said that in 1979, the "U.S. and China reestablished diplomatic relations and signed a bilateral trade deal."

Trump claimed that "they took that away at the last moment," but then followed up by saying, "and then I canceled the whole thing. And then six months later, we ended up doing a smaller deal. But it was a big deal. It was $50 billion worth of product that they were going to purchase from our farmers, etc, and we agreed to that."

He then confessed that he was confused about the amount of the tariffs.

"People thought it was 15 because they were doing 15," Trump said. "We made it 50 because I misunderstood the 15. I thought they said — I said, you got to get 50 because when I asked — if you remember the story — when I asked, what are we doing with them? My secretary of agriculture at the time, Sonny Perdue, said, uh, sir, it's about $15 billion and we're asking for 15. And I thought he said 50. So, I said — so they came back with the deal at 15 and I said, no way, I want 50 because you said 50. They said, sir, we didn't say that. Anyway. Bottom line, I said, go back and ask for 50. And they gave us 50, and they were honoring the deal, and we would call them up a lot for the corn and for the wheat and for everything."

Trump said that China was "honoring the detail" until former President Joe Biden "got in, they no longer honored the deal." When Biden came into office, it was amid the COVID-19 crisis, when trade was disrupted.

"The effects of the countries’ different responses are evident in our trade data as Chinese exports are more affected by the shock than Chinese imports. The impact of COVID-19 on trade included delays, shortages, and increased transportation costs. These shocks affected both supply and demand," Science Direct reported in a report about the way the pandemic disrupted trade.

Trump claimed that under Biden, "there was nobody to call. I would call on an average of once every two weeks to say, come on, you have to speed it up a little bit. And our farmers were doing great. I said to him, buy more land and bigger tractors. If you remember, that's what happened. But the deal was a very good deal. But the best part of the deal was that we opened up China. China agreed to open itself up to American business to go in, and it would have been a great thing, I think, for China, they would be able to see things that they haven't seen. They would be able to buy products that they had never been able to buy. Would have been great for American businesses."

Trump then said "they canceled it the last day" and "I got a little bit angry."

See a clip of the comments below or at the link here.

- YouTube www.youtube.com