Grisanti Censured for 2020 Incident Involving Police; Neighbor

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct has determined that Mark J. Grisanti, a Judge of the Court of Claims and an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Erie County, should be censured for engaging in a street brawl with his neighbors, and for participating in cases involving an attorney with whom he had an ongoing financial relationship.

The Commission’s Administrator had recommended that Judge Grisanti be removed from office.

Six Commission members voted for censure, and four voted to remove the judge.

June 2020 Altercation

On June 22, 2020, Judge Grisanti instigated a verbal and physical altercation with a neighbor and his wife over a parking spot. Upon seeing the neighbors’ car parked near his own driveway, Judge Grisanti called 911.

Before Buffalo police officers arrived, both Judge Grisanti and his wife confronted and yelled profanities at the neighbors, who responded in kind. During their confrontation, the parties came into rough physical contact with one another.

Upon arriving at the scene, two police officers captured the ensuing events on body cameras. After one officer grabbed Mrs. Grisanti and brought her to the ground attempting to handcuff her, Judge Grisanti shoved him and yelled, “you arrest my f****** wife…you’re going to be sorry,” and “my son…and my daughter are…both police officers.”

Judge Grisanti himself was handcuffed and placed in a police car at the scene and continued to drop the names of high-ranking police officials and the Mayor of Buffalo.

Participating in Matters Involving a Lawyer Who Owed Him Money

On becoming a full-time judge in May 2015, Judge Grisanti sold his law practice for $50,000 to Peter J. Pecoraro and Matthew A. Lazroe, who put $15,000 down and began making monthly payments of $730 to satisfy the balance.

Nevertheless, Judge Grisanti took judicial action in eight cases involving Mr. Lazroe, either during the time he was receiving the installment payments, or in the two-year period following the last payment. Among other things, Judge Grisanti awarded remunerative case assignments to Mr. Lazroe, did not disclose their relationship on the record of those cases, and failed to report the income earned from the sale on his 2015 Financial Disclosure Statement.

In censuring Judge Grisanti, the Commission stated that:

Although we consider [Judge Grisanti’s] misconduct on June 22, 2020 to be very serious and he displayed especially poor judgment that day, we do not find that removal from judicial office is warranted for this single incident particularly since it occurred in the context of a longstanding dispute between the entire neighborhood and the [neighbors], and involved a legitimate concern by respondent for the physical wellbeing of his wife as she was being taken to the ground by a police officer. The Commission also considered several mitigating factors, including that the judge has been attending counseling since the incident.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Related articles

Texas AG sued Shein over deceptive trade practices. We unpacked lawsuit

The attorney general's office claimed Shein made "false, misleading, and deceptive representations" about the clothes it sold.

Even After Trump’s Wild Threats, House GOP Blocks Dems From Voting on Iran War

House Democrats on Thursday tried to rein in the Trump administration’s unauthorized Iran war while the House is on its...

Trump and Hegseth assault allegations featured prominently in pro-Iran ‘trolling’ campaign



President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have been featured recently in a series of videos that have “flooded the internet” since the United States attacked Iran in late February, videos from pro-Iran groups that prominently feature the sexual assault allegations leveled against the current president and his top Defense official.

“Trump is globally known for sex crimes and, like Hegseth, charges of sex crimes – and the Iranian videos depict the two men explicitly as rapists,” reads a report published Wednesday in The New Republic.

“In one video, [a] Lego Trump has doll-like girl figures on his bed and lap, and Hegseth is shown in military garb, repeatedly committing rape. Assaults on girls are the modus vivendi of these videos’ versions of Trump and Hegseth.”

Trump has faced sexual misconduct allegations from at least two dozen women dating back to the 1970s, and was found liable for sexual abuse by a jury in civil court in 2023. Hegseth has also faced an allegation of sexual assault, though both Trump and Hegseth have denied any wrongdoing.

While not produced by the Iranian government, the video campaign – described by The New Republic as "not idle trolling" – has been heavily promoted by Tehran.

Pro-Iran groups, particularly the anonymous student activist group Explosive News, have seized on the allegations against Trump and Hegseth, depicting Trump as a sexual abuser in a series of Lego-inspired videos generated with generative artificial intelligence, videos that have gone on to be watched by millions on social media. Hegseth has also been featured prominently in the video campaign.

As to the campaign’s core message as it relates to Trump – that the president had “the ideology of the rapist” – The New Republic’s Virginia Heffernan argued it was hard to disagree.

“In Trump, the ideology of the rapist was unmistakable a decade ago, when he crowed about the joy he takes in humiliating human beings by mauling their crotches,” Heffernan wrote. “With this war, he’s trying, as usual, for highly aestheticized spectacles of humiliation, and he’s getting them – but not for Iran. For himself, and for the United States.”