2026 Capital Projects Committee, Meeting 3, 2025-07-17


The meeting focused on the sheriff’s office’s proposed projects for facility upgrades and enhancements aimed at improving security, efficiency, and community integration, alongside discussions on funding and operational challenges.

• The county executive will not attend the meeting; the vice chair will lead it.

• The sheriff’s office presented two major projects: a camera upgrade and a new fleet operations facility.

• The camera project aims to enhance security at the correction facility with high-definition cameras and total coverage.

• A new fleet operations building will centralize maintenance and improve working conditions for staff.

• Current facilities are outdated, causing safety and operational issues for maintenance staff and law enforcement.

• Proposed projects aim to improve security, efficiency, and community integration within the sheriff’s office operations.

• Increased communication noted since Aaron’s arrival, addressing sensitive issues effectively.

• Discussion on a "lease to own" scenario for facility development shows potential cost savings.

• Proposed correctional facility renovations focus on demolition and expansion, with an estimated cost of over $40 million.

• Feasibility study highlights community needs and suggests significant savings through reduced staffing levels.

• Current inmate population is around 807, with plans to accommodate up to 922 in the new facility.

• Funding requests include $3.5 million for mechanical improvements and $1.5 million for building envelope evaluations.

• Funding requests include $12.5 million for a new highway maintenance facility and $3.5 million for building upgrades.

• The convention center requires significant investment, with ongoing concerns about its suitability for large conventions.

• Local law allocates hotel occupancy tax revenue for capital needs, impacting funding availability for projects.

Action Items:

• Follow up on the proposed camera project for the correction facility, including potential phasing and cost breakdown.

• Investigate the plans for the new facility and how it relates to the current camera project.

• Review community outreach programs that could be implemented in conjunction with the new facility.

• Explore options for purchasing land for the new fleet operations building and discuss leasing options with developers.

• Assess the viability of using the old fleet garage building for cold storage or other purposes after moving to a new facility.

• Explore the opportunity for a lease-to-own scenario for the facility project, including discussions with legal teams and county attorneys.

• Evaluate existing facilities around the county that might be available for use and report findings.

• Draft a request for proposals (RFP) for design related to the correctional facility renovations.

• Continue discussions regarding potential state assistance for funding the correctional facility project.

• Investigate regional solutions or partnerships with other counties regarding inmate housing and transportation logistics.

• Assess environmental compliance needs and develop necessary assessments and inspections as projects move forward.

• Prepare an amendment for the consultant regarding site-specific design for the new highway maintenance facility.

• Review and finalize the funding request details for the general upgrades to maintain the building and keep the facility viable in the production market.

• Follow up with Pat Hayler to discuss the changing landscape of the convention business and potential strategies for attracting larger out-of-town conventions.

Related articles

A reckoning awaits these out-of-touch lawmakers hopelessly in denial



Last month, some House members publicly acknowledged that Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza. It’s a judgment that Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch unequivocally proclaimed a year ago. Israeli human-rights organizations have reached the same conclusion. But such clarity is sparse in Congress.

And no wonder. Genocide denial is needed for continuing to appropriate billions of dollars in weapons to Israel, as most legislators have kept doing. Congress members would find it very difficult to admit that Israeli forces are committing genocide while voting to send them more weaponry.

Three weeks ago, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) introduced a resolution titled “Recognizing the genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza.” Twenty-one House colleagues, all of them Democrats, signed on as co-sponsors. They account for 10 percent of the Democrats in Congress.

In sharp contrast, a national Quinnipiac Poll found that 77 percent of Democrats “think Israel is committing genocide.” That means there is a 67 percent gap between what the elected Democrats are willing to say and what the people who elected them believe. The huge gap has big implications for the party’s primaries in the midterm elections next year, and then in the race for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination.

One of the likely candidates in that race, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), is speaking out in ways that fit with the overwhelming views of Democratic voters.

“I agree with the UN commission's heartbreaking finding that there is a genocide in Gaza,” he tweeted as autumn began. “What matters is what we do about it – stop military sales that are being used to kill civilians and recognize a Palestinian state.”

Consistent with that position, the California congressman was one of the score of Democrats who signed on as co-sponsors of Tlaib’s resolution the day it was introduced.

In the past, signers of such a resolution would have reason to fear the wrath — and the electoral muscle — of AIPAC, the Israel-can-do-no-wrong lobby. But its intimidation power is waning. AIPAC’s support for Israel does not represent the views of the public, a reality that has begun to dawn on more Democratic officeholders.

“With American support for the Israeli government’s management of the conflict in Gaza undergoing a seismic reversal, and Democratic voters’ support for the Jewish state dropping off steeply, AIPAC is becoming an increasingly toxic brand for some Democrats on Capitol Hill,” the New York Times reported this fall. Notably, “some Democrats who once counted AIPAC among their top donors have in recent weeks refused to take the group’s donations.”

Khanna has become more and more willing to tangle with AIPAC, which is now paying for attack ads against him.

On Thanksgiving, he tweeted about Gaza and accused AIPAC of “asking people to disbelieve what they saw with their own eyes.” Khanna elaborated in a campaign email days ago, writing: “Any politician who caves to special interests on Gaza will never stand up to special interests on corruption, healthcare, housing, or the economy. If we can’t speak with moral clarity when thousands of children are dying, we won’t stand for working Americans when corporate power comes knocking.”

AIPAC isn’t the only well-heeled organization for Israel now struggling with diminished clout. Democratic Majority for Israel, an offshoot of AIPAC that calls itself “an American advocacy group that supports pro-Israel policies within the United States Democratic Party,” is now clearly misnamed. Every bit of recent polling shows that in the interests of accuracy, the organization should change its name to “Democratic Minority for Israel.”

Yet the party’s leadership remains stuck in a bygone era. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), the chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, typifies how disconnected so many party leaders are from the actual views of Democratic voters. Speaking in Brooklyn three months ago, she flatly claimed that “nine out of 10 Democrats are pro-Israel.” She did not attempt to explain how that could be true when more than seven out of 10 Democrats say Israel is guilty of genocide.

The political issue of complicity with genocide will not go away.

Last week, Amnesty International released a detailed statement documenting that “Israeli authorities are still committing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, by continuing to deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction.” But in Congress, almost every Republican and a large majority of Democrats remain stuck in public denial about Israel’s genocidal policies.

Such denial will be put to the electoral test in Democratic primaries next year, when most incumbents will face an electorate far more morally attuned to Gaza than they are. What easily passes for reasoned judgment and political smarts in Congress will seem more like cluelessness to many Democratic activists and voters who can provide reality checks with their ballots.

UB Emergency Medicine Professor Joins National Drug Abuse Innovators Program

Johns Hopkins recognizes Joshua Lynch for his pioneering opioid...

New York’s bell-to-bell smartphone ban

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgi0badA4yU New York became the largest state in...