The Diocese of Buffalo’s parish assessments are not the road to renewal

The protracted efforts of the Diocese of Buffalo to merge and close parishes while simultaneously assessing the parishes to raise money for the settlement of abuse claims are running on parallel tracks.  Neither of those tracks, however, is a road to renewal.

The mergers and closing, the Diocese has said, are a necessity created by lower attendance at religious activities as well as the shrinking number of priests who are available to say mass.  The former issue is the result of thousands of individual decisions of Catholics, particularly young people.  The latter issue could be ameliorated to some degree by adjusting the manner of providing religious services.

Craig Speers, who has long been actively involved with parish efforts particularly at St. Michael’s in Buffalo, noted in a recent letter to Bishop Michael Fisher “that the diocese has access to many hundreds of deacons, nuns and Eucharistic  ministers who can hold Eucharistic prayer services throughout the diocese in order to address the needs of the faithful, thus negating any alleged priestly shortage.”  Such arrangements, of course, would require the leadership of the Diocese to accept that reality and act creatively.  Such actions would come with some operational and maintenance expenses that the parishes would need to manage.

One of the interesting but hardly acknowledged revelations from the Diocese’s efforts to produce eighty million dollars for their pay-for-the-settlement project is that the parishes of the Diocese, from the largest to the smallest, have generally been incredibly good shepherds of the money that has been raised and spent for parish activities.  These efforts in many cases go back many decades.  Speers pointed out in his letter to the Bishop that at St. Micheal’s the time frame extends all the way back to 1850.

That long-time work has included construction of the parish church and auxiliary buildings which over the decades required renovation and maintenance projects large and small.  Parishes operated schools, which for many became a responsibility too large as the cost of providing a quality education for students required tuition payments that were difficult for many families to manage.  The parishes, as we have learned from the assessments that were required, managed to carry on through thick and thin.

The same cannot be said for the leadership of the Diocese.  A lack of good financial planning for the realities of a smaller number of the faithful contributed to the somewhat panicky current efforts to raise millions of dollars for the settlement of pedophile abuse claims.

What has brought everything to a crisis stage is the incredibly poor decisions over many decades to properly manage the personnel working for the Diocese, specifically its priests.  The hundreds of bad decisions to shuffle pedophile priests around from parish to parish instead of going to legal authorities and prosecuting the offenders is an offense that falls directly upon a long succession of bishops.  They thought that trying to hide the problems was better than exposing the priests who were performing criminal acts of abuse.

Good intentions today cannot reverse history.  But how the leadership of the Diocese is now managing things is in its own way creating a whole new mess.

Speers’ letter to the Bishop points to some actions taken by current diocesan leadership that are making matters worse.  Reduced mass schedules, limited information to parishioners through the Church bulletin, and the absence of notification to the faithful about the availability of the Sacraments of Matrimony or Baptism is not serving members of the parish.

Speers also suggests that that the Diocese has violated the Vatican-issued Order of Suspension related to St. Michael’s which restricts the Diocese’s ability to make changes in the operation of the parish while the Vatican considers more important questions about the existence and operation of the parish.

Some good advice for organizations and individuals that makes life go better is that “when you are already in a hole, stop digging.”  The Buffalo Diocese’s Road to Renewal and fundraising efforts on the backs of its parishes have been poorly managed.  It’s time to take a deep breath and re-evaluate where things stand and what should be done going forward.

If in fact the settlement plan for the victims of the pedophile clergy is going to bring some closure to the awful history of the Diocese (do we know if that is in fact correct?), then it’s time to take a better look at where the money is coming from. 

The Diocese has begged off on the option of using some of the $3.75 billion from the sale of Fidelity Care that is held by the Mother Cabrini Health Foundation.  The money is under the control of Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the Archbishop of New York, on behalf of all the dioceses in New York State.  It seems like a logical solution not just for Buffalo but in other Dioceses in the state that have also been going through pedophile restitution issues. 

Accessing that money to fund the settlements would allow local parishes to stabilize without dealing with the pressure that will lead to not so well thought out actions.  Given the reduction in church attendance some mergers and closures would likely still be warranted but could be determined and carried out in a more rational atmosphere.

The heavy-handed manner in which the Diocese has conducted its Road to Renewal and its demands for contributions to finance the abuse settlements has done a great deal of harm.  A reassessment of how things are managed is in order.

Bluesky  @kenkruly

Twitter/X  @kenkruly

Threads   kenkruly

Related articles

Fox Host Warns Iran Knows Trump Can’t Keep War Going Indefinitely, US is ‘Hamstrung’ By Debt

"The U.S. is hamstrung by its ability to take on new debt, as our credit card is, in essence, beginning to be maxed out."

The post Fox Host Warns Iran Knows Trump Can’t Keep War Going Indefinitely, US is ‘Hamstrung’ By Debt first appeared on Mediaite.

The latest world climate report is grim, but it’s not the end of the story



It’s no secret our planet is heating up.

And here’s the evidence: we’ve just experienced the 11 hottest years on record, with 2025 being the second or third warmest in global history.

The annual State of the Climate report, published today by the World Meteorological Organization, suggests we’re still too reliant on fossil fuels. And that’s pushing us further from our goal to decarbonise.

So what is happening to our climate? And how should we respond?

The climate picture

Unfortunately, the most recent climate data makes for grim reading.

Let’s look back at 2025, through the lens of four climate change indicators.

Carbon dioxide

We now have a record amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, about 50% higher than pre-industrial levels. And we’re still emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide through our use of fossil fuels. In 2025, global emissions reached record high levels. The carbon dioxide we emit can stay in the atmosphere for a long time. So each year we keep emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide, the more concentrated it will be in our atmosphere.

Temperature

In 2025, the world experienced its second or third warmest year on record, depending on which dataset you use. The average temperature was about 1.43°C above the pre-industrial average.

This is particularly unusual given we observed slight La Niña conditions in the Pacific region. La Niña is a type of climate pattern characterised by temperature changes in the Pacific Ocean. It typically creates milder, wetter conditions in Australia and has a cooling effect on the global average temperature. But even with La Niña conditions, the planet stayed exceptionally hot.

And each of the last 11 years were hotter than any of the previous years in the global temperature series. This is true across all the different datasets used in the report. However, this does not mean a new record was set each year.

Oceans and ice

In 2025, the heat held within the world’s oceans reached a record high. And as our oceans continue to warm, sea levels will also rise. Hotter oceans also speed up the process of acidification, where oceans absorb an increased amount of carbon dioxide with potentially devastating consequences for some marine animals.

The amount of Arctic and Antarctic ice is also well below average. This report shows sea ice extent, a measure of how much ocean is covered by at least some sea ice, is at or close to record low levels in the Arctic. Meanwhile, the amount of ice stored in glaciers has also significantly decreased.

Extreme weather

Research shows many of the most devastating extreme weather events of 2025 were exacerbated by human-driven climate change. The heatwaves in Central Asia, wildfires in East Asia and Hurricane Melissa in the Carribean are just three examples. Through attribution analysis, which is how scientists determine the causes of an extreme weather or climate event, this report highlights how our greenhouse gas emissions are making severe weather events more common and intense.

How does Australia stack up?

Compared to most other countries, Australia has a disproportionate impact on the global climate.

This is largely because our per capita carbon dioxide emissions are about three times the global average. That means on average, each of us emits more carbon dioxide than people in all European countries and the US.

Emissions matter because they exacerbate the greenhouse effect. That is the process by which greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, trap heat near Earth’s surface. So by emitting more greenhouse gases, we contribute to global warming. And research suggests Earth is warming twice as fast today, compared to previous decades.

However, Australia is also experiencing first-hand the adverse effects of human-induced climate change.

In 2025, we lived through our fourth-warmest year on record. The annual surface temperatures of the seas around Australia reached historic highs, beating the record temperatures set in 2024. And last March was the hottest March we’ve seen across the continent.

Here in Australia, we are also battling longer and hotter heatwaves and bushfire seasons. And scientists warn these extreme weather events will only become more common.

The Bureau of Meteorology’s annual summary highlights how Australia’s climate is changing.

So what can we do?

The 2025 State of the Climate Report shows how much, and how quickly, we are changing our climate. And it is worryingly similar to previous reports, highlighting the need for urgent action.

The priority should be decreasing our emissions. This would slow down global warming, which will only continue if we keep the status quo. Some countries are already decarbonising rapidly, in part through transitioning to renewable electricity supplies. Others, including Australia, need to move much faster to reduce emissions.

Crucially, we must also meet our net zero targets. In Australia, as in many other countries, we are aiming to reach net zero by 2050. The sooner we reach net zero, the more likely we are to avoid harmful climate change impacts in future. To achieve net zero, we need to significantly reduce our emissions while also increasing how much carbon we remove from the atmosphere.

Even if we meet our net zero targets, climate change will not magically disappear. However, by turning away from fossil fuels and cutting our greenhouse gas emissions now, we may spare future generations from its worst effects. That’s the least we can do.The Conversation

‘It’s Despicable!’ Karoline Leavitt Uses Fox Graphic to Bash Media Over Migrant Murder Story

Karoline Leavitt used a Fox News graphic as a prop with which to bash the press over its scant coverage of the murder of Sheridan Gorman.

The post ‘It’s Despicable!’ Karoline Leavitt Uses Fox Graphic to Bash Media Over Migrant Murder Story first appeared on Mediaite.

‘My favorite thing is to take the oil’: Trump goes off script on Iran war plans



President Donald Trump made several telling remarks Sunday in an interview with the Financial Times, revealing some of his administration’s potential war plans as it relates to Iran.

“To be honest with you, my favorite thing is to take the oil in Iran but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people,” Trump told the Financial Times, the outlet reported.

Trump told the outlet that his “preference” in his administration’s war against Iran would be for the United States to “take the oil," invoking a comparison to the U.S. takeover of Venezuela’s oil industry in January when the Trump administration halted Venezuelan oil shipments to the Cuban government, and started oil shipments to Israel “for the first time in years.”

Trump also spoke to the possibility of the U.S. military seizing Kharg Island, an Iranian island critical to the nation’s oil industry.

“Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t. We have a lot of options,” Trump said, speaking with the Financial Times. “It would also mean we had to be [in Kharg Island] for a while. I don’t think they have any defense. We could take it very easily.”

Trump’s war against Iran has sent oil prices soaring as Iran continues to block U.S.-aligned vessels from accessing the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial shipping channel through which 20% of the world’s oil trade flows. Trump has reportedly been looking for a way out of the war, though one former Trump security advisor warned that such an off-ramp may no longer exist.