Attorney General James And Governor Cuomo Announce New York State Intends To Sue United States EPA For Failing To Meet Goals Of Hudson River PCB Cleanup

Remaining PCB Contamination Poses Continuing Threat To Public Health And The Environment   

NEW YORK—Attorney General Letitia James and Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced that New York State intends to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency after EPA issued the Certificate of Completion for General Electric’s cleanup of PCB contamination in the Hudson River. Late last year, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) released a study showing the cleanup of contamination in the upper Hudson River is incomplete and not protective of public health and the environment. At that time, the State demanded that EPA not issue the Certificate of Completion, as PCB – or polychlorinated biphenyls – levels in fish are still above EPA’s own acceptable risk range. EPA’s decision to issue the COC is contrary to the law and could make it much harder for EPA to require GE to implement more dredging or other remedial measures in the upper Hudson River, as needed to protect public health and the environment. EPA issued the COC on April 11.   

“The Hudson River is critical to the environment and economy of New York,” said Attorney General Letitia James. “Despite the EPA’s stance, the facts remain crystal clear: the cleanup of PCBs is incomplete, and allowing GE to walk away without accountability is dangerous to the health and welfare of New Yorkers. Once again, the EPA has failed to protect the environment, and failed to protect the residents of our state, but my office will work tirelessly to ensure the cleanup and restoration of the Hudson River carries on.” 

“Time and again the Trump Administration puts corporations and polluters’ interests ahead of public health and the environment,” said Governor Cuomo. “The Hudson River is the lifeblood of communities from New York City to the Adirondacks but we know PCB levels remain unacceptably high in the riverbed and in fish. Since the EPA has failed to hold GE accountable for fulfilling its obligation to restore the river, New York State will take any action necessary to protect our waterways and that includes suing the EPA to demand a full and complete remediation. Anything less is unacceptable.” 

“EPA is failing in its mission to protect our environment,” said Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Basil Seggos. “EPA is obligated to direct GE to meet the cleanup goals set when the dredging remedy was selected. The federal government’s failure to protect New York’s environment and New Yorkers is unacceptable, and we are doing what we must to compel EPA and GE to finish the job and protect public health, the precious and irreplaceable Hudson River environment, and the communities that depend on a clean and healthy river.”

In the absence of federal leadership, DEC conducted a comprehensive analysis to collect hundreds of new sediment samples, confirming that elevated levels of PCBs remain in the surface sediment of the Hudson River. DEC found that the average sediment PCB concentration varied significantly between different reaches of river, indicating there are still certain areas in the upper Hudson where PCB contaminated sediments remain. In addition, DEC collected nearly 230 fish samples and evaluated fish data generated by the EPA and GE during and after the dredging project. DEC found that fish PCB concentrations are not recovering at the rate anticipated by EPA. DEC also found that fish PCB concentrations in the lower Hudson have not recovered as a result of the remedial work in the upper Hudson.  

To determine how much additional sediment cleanup is necessary to achieve the cleanup objectives in the ROD, EPA must direct GE to collect additional data to understand how to successfully meet the goals set in the ROD. EPA must also refine its understanding of the relationship between the remaining PCBs in upper Hudson sediments and the fish PCB concentrations in the upper Hudson to determine where and how much further sediment cleanup should be required of GE. DEC is also calling on EPA to compel GE to fund a full investigation of the lower Hudson or EPA should fund the work.  

EPA admits that dredging work in the upper Hudson will have little to no beneficial impact in the lower Hudson. In its May 2017 draft Five-Year Review of the remedy’s effectiveness, EPA stated that human and environmental risks from PCBs in the lower Hudson remain unacceptable and are not expected by EPA to improve because of the work in the upper Hudson. DEC is also calling on EPA to direct GE to collect additional data to determine if another round of sediment remediation is needed. In addition, EPA must compel GE to fund a full investigation of the lower Hudson, where PCB concentrations in fish have not recovered. If GE refuses, EPA should fund this necessary work.  

DEC and environmental organizations have repeatedly rejected the findings of EPA’s Five-Year Review Report on the Hudson River cleanup remedy and called on EPA to not issue the Certificate of Completion to GE.  

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the National Contingency Plan, EPA is required to monitor effectiveness of the remedy to affirm that it is meeting the goals set by the ROD. EPA must take additional remedial action if the remedy fails to meet the goals required by the ROD. 

Related articles

Progressive House candidate indicted amid Chicago-area ICE protests

Kat Abughazaleh, a Democrat running for an open House seat, said the charges are “unjust.”

Taron Johnson: “Do Everything I Can To Win” | Buffalo Bills

Bills Cornerback Taron Johnson meets with the...

Extreme new Trump admin rules threaten to shutter even more hospitals



A pair of extreme new Trump administration rules aimed at functionally banning gender-affirming healthcare for transgender youth could force even more hospitals to close down.

NPR reported Thursday that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) drafted a proposed rule that would prohibit federal Medicaid reimbursement for medical care provided to transgender patients younger than 18 and prohibit the same from the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for patients under 19.

Another proposed rule goes even further, blocking all Medicaid and Medicare funding to hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to youth.

As Erin Reed, an independent journalist who reports on LGBTQ+ rights, explained, this “would effectively eliminate access to such care nationwide, except at the few private clinics able to forgo Medicaid entirely, a rarity in transgender youth medicine.”

The policies are of a piece with the Trump administration and the broader Republican Party’s efforts to eliminate transgender healthcare for youth across the country.

Bans on gender-affirming care for those under 18 have already been passed in 27 states, despite evidence that early access to treatments like puberty blockers and hormones can save lives.

As Reed pointed out, a Cornell University review of more than 51 studies shows that access to such care dramatically reduces the risk of suicide and the rates of anxiety and depression among transgender adolescents.

The new HHS rules are being prepared for public release in November and would not be finalized for several more months.

But if passed, the ramifications could extend far beyond transgender people, impacting the entire healthcare system, for which federal funding from Medicare and Medicaid is a load-bearing piece. According to a report last year from the American Hospital Association, 96% of hospitals in the US have more than half their inpatient days paid for by Medicare and Medicaid.

It is already becoming apparent what happens when even some of that funding is taken away. As a result of the massive GOP budget law passed in July, an estimated $1 trillion is expected to be cut from Medicaid over the next decade. According to an analysis released Thursday by Protect Our Care, which maintains a Hospital Crisis Watch database, more than 500 healthcare providers across the country are already at risk of shutting down due to the budget cuts.

Tyler Hack, the executive director of the Christopher Street Project, a transgender rights organization, said that the newly proposed HHS rule would be “forcing hospitals to choose between providing lifesaving care for trans people or maintaining the ability to serve patients through Medicare and Medicaid.”

“Today’s news marks a dangerous overreach by the executive branch, pitting trans people, low-income families, disabled people, and seniors against each other and making hospitals choose which vulnerable populations to serve,” Hack said. “If these rules become law, it will kill people.”