Nixon Peabody Chosen for Stadium Lease

“Today, I am proud to announce that we have selected Nixon Peabody LLP to serve as the County’s special counsel during the upcoming stadium lease negotiations with the Buffalo Bills,” said Poloncarz. “We were impressed by Nixon Peabody’s tremendous amount of experience in these sorts of negotiations, including work on ten previous NFL stadiums. Also, in addition to having a significant local presence, Nixon Peabody represented Erie County once before in the development, financing and leasing of the now-First Niagara Center. I promised to assemble the best team possible, not only to successfully negotiate a lease agreement but also to strike a fair deal for County taxpayers. I support the County Attorney’s decision, after consultation with the selection committee, in selecting Nixon Peabody, and I believe this selection fulfills our promise.” After reviewing bids and conducting several in-person interviews over the past several weeks, the review committee chose Nixon Peabody LLP based on their extensive experience in negotiations, construction, development, financing and operation of sports facilities. Specifically, Nixon Peabody has provided counsel for work on more than 25 professional sports facilities, including 10 NFL stadiums. Additionally, Nixon Peabody has previously represented Erie County in development, financing and leasing of Crossroads Arena (now First Niagara Center). On January 3, 2012, Poloncarz signed several Executive Orders as his first order of business as Erie County Executive. Executive Order #001—Procurement of Legal Services to Support Buffalo Bills Lease Negotiations, required the County Attorney to immediately commence a process to procure the services of special counsel to support the upcoming lease negotiations with the Buffalo Bills through the issuance of a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) from qualified law firms. Poloncarz continued, “Keeping the Bills here in Buffalo is not only important for our economy but also critical to the framework of our community. That is why as one of my first acts as County Executive, I called on the County attorney to initiate the RFP process so that when the Bills completed their architectural survey and were ready to begin negotiations, the County would be ready as well.” The RFP was issued on January 23, 2012 with responses from interested parties due by February 10, 2012. Responses were received from law firms across the country and region, including: Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC (Buffalo, NY), Damon Morey LLP (Buffalo, NY), Hodgson Russ LLP (Buffalo, NY), Hogan & Willig (Buffalo, NY), Kavinoky & Cook LLP (Buffalo, NY), Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLP (Buffalo, NY), Nixon Peabody LLP (Buffalo, NY), Pannone Lopes Devereaux & West LLC (Albany, NY), Phillips Lytle LLP (Buffalo, NY), Squire Sanders LLP (New York, NY), Thompson Hine LLP (Cleveland, OH), Underberg & Kessler LLP (Buffalo, NY), and Winstead PC (Fort Worth, TX). The current lease agreement was negotiated by Erie County in 1998 under County Executive Dennis Gorski and is set to expire as of July 30, 2013.

]]>

Related articles

‘Chaos’ at Trump’s ‘mega master’ court renders judges and defendants ‘terrified’: Report



The Trump administration's newly launched "mega master" court system has quickly devolved into mass chaos that leaves defendants, guards, lawyers and judges "terrified," according to a new report.

"Attorneys and former judges say mega master hearings serve as the latest tool for the Trump administration to deport large numbers of people," the Chicago Sun-Times reported Friday. "This time by causing chaos and confusion in the courts."

Courtroom 11 at Chicago's immigration court barely seats 25 people — but one July morning saw 60 people, mostly unrepresented asylum seekers, crammed in wall-to-wall by 9:10 a.m., the Sun-Times reported.

This is a "mega master" calendar hearing, a new procedural format instituted by the Trump administration at the end of May that packs between 100 and 185 people into a single judge's morning docket — up from an average of just 30 before the change.

Chicago's courthouse at 55 E. Monroe has logged more of these mass hearings than any other immigration court in the country, according to immigration scholar Austin Kocher.

The scale has created conditions former immigration judges call dangerous.

On days when multiple mega hearings are scheduled simultaneously, hundreds of people — including families with strollers — spill into hallways narrower than an adult's arm span, waiting for hours to be called.

On one recent Thursday, roughly 200 people queued in the heat outside courtrooms designed to hold a fraction of that number.

"This is not good," one guard was overheard saying. Former judges have raised concerns that the overcrowded hallways amount to a fire hazard.

Attorneys and former judges argue the hearings serve to discourage immigrants from showing up at all, then fast-tracking deportations for those who don't.

In June, for the first time since 2019, more immigrants missed their Chicago court dates than attended — 58 percent of the 10,370 people summoned nationwide in June were marked absent, according to data from the nonprofit Mobile Pathways. Missing court can trigger an automatic in absentia deportation order.

Compounding the pressure, notice periods have collapsed. Median lead time for a Chicago hearing fell to just 34 days in June, down from 229 days in May.

The Justice Department, which oversees immigration courts, says the expanded scheduling is meant to clear long-standing backlogs.

But former judge Elizabeth Treacy, who resigned in June after presiding over three mega hearings with up to 150 people each, said the volume makes errors — and injustice — nearly inevitable.

She noted that indigenous asylum seekers with limited Spanish fluency are especially unlikely to speak up when they don't understand proceedings in a crowded, intimidating room.

“It’s not a coincidence, but another tactic to facilitate deportations,” said Stephanie Spiro, an attorney with the National immigration Justice Center.

“It’s much more efficient for the government to deport people without even having to read any briefs, without having to have a full hearing, without having to schedule hundreds of people, and actually listen to their claims, and afford them due process.”

That fear caused Carolina, an immigrant from Venezuela who just gave birth, to question whether she should show up for her hearing.

She and her husband eventually decided to risk deportation and bring their three children to court.

“I was terrified," she said.

Two looming primaries will test pro-Israel Democrats’ role in the party

The race for Michigan Senate and Missouri's 1st District has turned into referendums on the Democratic Party's once unwavering support for the longtime U.S. ally.